Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
4:00
a lot of the evidence in
4:02
this case, suggesting that there are in
4:04
fact additional victims. Tying keys
4:06
to other murders will close
4:08
out some other cases. How many? Well,
4:12
that remains to be determined at
4:14
this moment. Let's go around
4:16
the room and introduce ourselves to
4:18
the beautiful listeners. Josh
4:20
Hallmark, why don't you tell everybody
4:22
about your podcast? Hey everyone, this
4:24
is Josh Hallmark. I started
4:27
investigating Israel Keys in 2014 and
4:30
launched True Crime Bullshit in 2018. It
4:34
was intended to just be a one season
4:37
exploration of Israel Keys. And now
4:39
six years later, it's
4:41
just a deep dive investigation into
4:43
all things Keys with a specific
4:45
focus on trying to identify his
4:48
unknown victims. And how about the
4:50
Somewhere in the Pines guys? How's it going
4:52
everyone? My name's Dakota. I
4:55
work with Joshua Ash on
4:58
the show Somewhere in the Pines. And
5:00
our focus is to locate the hidden
5:02
caches of Israel Keys to hopefully help
5:04
identify his unknown victims. And hey everyone,
5:07
this is Joshua Ash. We've been researching
5:09
for the past three years and physically
5:11
searching for about the last year and
5:13
a half all throughout
5:15
the Olympic Peninsula. I'm trying to
5:17
locate any sort of signs or landmarks
5:20
that Israel could have used to help
5:22
identify where a cache would be. Well
5:24
gentlemen, we are forced to reverse engineer
5:26
this case. Keys is caught and then
5:28
this mystery starts to unfold for investigators
5:30
and the FBI in particular. So
5:33
we need to start with how
5:35
did Israel Keys get apprehended and
5:37
what for? Yeah, so Keys' apprehension
5:39
is funny because the whole mythology
5:41
surrounding Keys is he's the most
5:44
meticulous, thoughtful serial killer ever. And
5:46
he actually got caught being
5:49
pretty reckless and stupid. He was arrested on March
5:51
13 of 2012 in Lufkin, Texas after
5:56
he had used a missing
5:58
woman named Semir. for
8:00
our listeners here, for the folks that
8:02
are not familiar with this case. We
8:05
have his first known
8:07
victim, which was
8:10
taken from Alaska, correct? He's
8:12
abducted her from a drive-through
8:14
coffee stand the day
8:16
before he and his family left to
8:18
go on a cruise in Anchorage, Alaska.
8:20
She's working alone, and then I believe
8:23
he kept her captive on his property
8:25
for some time? Well, he kept
8:27
her on his property for some time. He
8:29
abducted her and essentially drove around Anchorage with
8:31
her in his car for, I think, two
8:34
to three hours while he was waiting for
8:36
his family to go to sleep. When
8:38
he felt like the coast was clear, he
8:41
took her back to a shed in his
8:43
driveway where he tied
8:45
her up and assaulted
8:47
her, eventually realized that
8:50
in the haste of abducting her, he had
8:53
not gotten some of her items that he
8:55
needed, specifically a debit card. So he drove
8:58
back to her house, went through
9:00
her car, got her debit
9:02
card, returned, got
9:04
the PIN number from her to use
9:06
at a later date. As far
9:09
as we can tell, he kept Samantha alive
9:11
in that shed for about four
9:14
hours and then killed
9:17
her, immediately went into his house,
9:19
showered and took his kid to the airport
9:21
so they could take this family cruise. But
9:23
he kept Samantha in the shed in his
9:26
driveway for weeks while
9:28
he was traveling in Texas, Louisiana,
9:30
and the Caribbean. This attack and
9:32
abduction and murder takes place in
9:34
Alaska where he's living. And then
9:36
after apprehension, hundreds of miles away
9:39
in the state of Texas, he's
9:41
confessing to a double homicide
9:43
that took place the year
9:45
prior, hundreds of miles away
9:47
from Texas in Vermont. And so I
9:50
wanted to make that clear to all
9:52
the listeners there, how expansive his
9:54
crimes and crime scenes
9:57
and victims that he's left behind could be.
10:00
already trailing from Alaska all the
10:02
way out to Vermont. And Josh,
10:04
could you break down what
10:06
is known about his confessions and his
10:08
interviews after he gets caught?
10:11
Yeah. So, you know,
10:14
he only ever confessed to
10:17
Samantha Koenig's murder and the murders of
10:19
Bill and Lorraine Currier, but like I
10:22
had previously mentioned, he did insinuate or
10:25
actually state that there were other victims.
10:28
And it's interesting because I think you could
10:30
take these interviews in many different ways. One
10:32
could be bragging, but what he said that
10:34
has always stuck with me is, this is
10:36
the first time I'm able to talk about
10:38
these things. So I think while
10:40
trying to not give them
10:43
too much information, he was also very
10:45
excited to talk about this other life
10:47
that he had been living for 14
10:49
years. It became abundantly clear
10:51
that Keyes had rules about
10:54
abducting and killing people. And he didn't
10:56
always stay true to those rules. The
10:58
first one was never abduct
11:00
or kill someone from your own backyard,
11:02
which he obviously did with Samantha Koenig.
11:04
And I think that's a big reason
11:07
he got caught eventually. So you would
11:09
see as the FBI started
11:11
talking to him and going through his
11:13
travel records that he had traveled extensively
11:15
in the 14 years that he claimed
11:17
to be active, so 98
11:19
to 2012. In
11:21
that time, he traveled to almost every single
11:24
state, multiple countries. And
11:27
in addition to just traveling away from his
11:30
home base to commit crimes, he would go
11:33
to great lengths to muddy
11:35
his travels. So for example,
11:37
when he abducted the couriers, he flew
11:41
into Chicago, rented a car,
11:43
drove from Chicago to Vermont,
11:46
abducted them, and then immediately left the
11:48
area. He drove to Maine. So this
11:50
became his MO. It's something
11:52
he bragged about to the FBI.
11:55
However, we don't believe that this
11:57
MO was consistent across all crimes.
11:59
I've talked to multiple criminal psychologists
12:02
and the general consensus is there were crimes
12:05
of desire and opportunity and
12:08
then crimes that took place
12:10
because he couldn't have the right
12:12
victim or the right circumstance but was primed to
12:14
kill. So a lot
12:17
of the mythology surrounding Keyes is he was
12:19
super meticulous and he only lived by these
12:21
rules and while they were rules he wanted
12:23
to commit crimes by, they were often
12:26
the exception and not the rule. So
12:28
let me just wrap my head around
12:30
this. He confesses, he's caught for a
12:32
crime that took place in 2012 and
12:35
then he confesses to crimes that took place in 2011 but you
12:38
say that there was
12:40
a 14 year period so
12:43
during one of these interviews he's alluding to
12:46
the idea that he started 14 years prior.
12:48
What he says verbatim is when asked
12:51
how long he's been two different people
12:53
he says 14 years. Unfortunately
12:56
the language is a little bit muddy
12:58
here but they ask how long he's
13:00
gone in between crimes I believe and
13:02
he says three years while he was
13:04
in the Army and he
13:06
enlisted in the Army in 98 which again corroborates
13:09
that 14 year period. Now there's
13:11
some confusion about what he means
13:13
by that whether the crime he
13:15
committed in 98 was a murder or just an
13:19
assault which he does go
13:21
into pretty specific detailed
13:23
accounts regarding an assault he
13:25
committed he believes in 97
13:27
or 98. So there
13:30
isn't clarity around when he
13:32
began killing people but the
13:35
two lines I'm thinking are either 98 or 2001.
13:37
So active across the entire country for 12 to
13:39
14 years
13:45
and the thing about Keys
13:47
is he was sexually motivated he
13:50
was bisexual he said
13:52
that once his daughter was born he
13:54
stopped targeting children but essentially
13:56
any American could be a Keys
13:58
victim because he took care of
14:01
him. targeted men and women and
14:03
occasionally children and traveled the entire
14:05
country. With the bill in Lorraine
14:07
courier homicides out in Vermont, what
14:11
do we learn about that? Because when
14:14
you say he flies into Chicago, rents
14:17
a car and then goes off
14:19
driving several states away and finds
14:21
two victims there, were
14:23
these two targeted? We know that
14:25
he had a murder kit that
14:27
it's believed that he had a murder kit there that
14:29
he had hidden months
14:32
or years prior. So
14:34
do we know for certain if these two victims
14:36
were, were chosen and watched
14:38
for any period of time? Or
14:41
was he simply going to go
14:43
to this area, retrieve the kill
14:45
kit and then go find a
14:48
victim? That is a great question. And I'll start
14:50
with what we know for sure. He
14:52
buried a kill kit about half
14:54
a mile from their house two years
14:56
prior to abducting them. He
14:59
told the FBI that they
15:01
were chosen basically because of the house
15:03
that they lived in, uh,
15:05
that he had not chosen them as victims,
15:07
but was looking for a specific type of
15:10
house to break into and to abduct someone
15:12
from. And then there
15:14
are a few lines of thinking. One is that
15:16
he's telling the truth. I believe that
15:18
he had actually targeted this couple for
15:20
some period of time prior to abducting
15:23
them. Lorraine courier had told a
15:25
friend that a man had been watching her.
15:27
In the weeks leading up to her disappearance,
15:30
there are multiple sightings, placing keys in
15:32
the area of their home in the
15:34
weeks and months leading up to their
15:36
disappearance. There is some
15:38
reason to believe that keys
15:41
and bill courier may have digitally crossed
15:43
paths prior to the abduction. So, you
15:46
know, I
15:49
don't want to say positively that they were previously
15:52
selected by keys. And I know
15:54
that at least Josh from somewhere in the pines does. not
16:00
necessarily agree with that. But
16:02
I think there's enough compelling circumstantial
16:04
evidence to consider that
16:06
he might have, not just in this case,
16:08
but in several others preselected and
16:11
then targeted a victim for some time prior
16:13
to abducting them. We'll give Joshua a chance
16:15
to weigh in here in a second. But
16:18
back to if he was telling the
16:20
truth, that he was selecting a particular
16:22
home, fill us in on why
16:24
that is. It didn't have something to do with
16:27
his work history, what he did for
16:29
a living, his expertise. Possibly.
16:34
There's a lot of content. I don't have
16:36
it all by heart. But I don't recall
16:38
him ever making that distinction.
16:40
But he did say
16:42
that he was looking for single-story, ranch-style
16:45
homes with a single-car garage and
16:47
no other cars in the driveway.
16:49
He said that they were easier
16:51
to get in and out of,
16:54
that it was more likely that there were
16:56
fewer people in a home, if there was
16:59
only a single car, and that he wanted
17:01
an attached garage so he could move the
17:04
abductees from their home into their
17:06
car and leave the premises as
17:08
quickly as possible without anyone witnessing them. That
17:11
he would have a good guess at
17:14
the layout of the building or the
17:16
house as well. Yeah, that too. And
17:18
going back to my theory or hypothesis
17:20
that he had pre-chosen this couple, he
17:23
said that he walked from his motel
17:26
essentially to their house and this was
17:28
the first house that matched that desired
17:30
description. I've walked it many times and
17:32
there are many houses like that between
17:34
his hotel and the career zone. One
17:36
of the things that's fascinating about Israel
17:39
Keys, it seems like
17:41
you were saying he has this list
17:44
of rules that he tries to follow. So
17:47
at some point, obviously, he understood
17:49
that he had these urges to
17:52
kill and obviously then maybe he
17:54
then goes on to study other
17:57
killers. Do we have a definitive?
18:00
list of these rules that
18:02
he tried to follow? Um,
18:04
ish. You know, he
18:06
never pulled up an
18:09
Excel spreadsheet and put together his rules.
18:11
But yeah, you know, he said never
18:14
commit crimes in your own backyard. Immediately
18:17
leave the area once you've
18:19
committed a crime. One
18:21
rule which we actually have no evidence that
18:23
he ever followed was abduct a victim
18:26
from one state, assault
18:29
them and or murder them in a second
18:31
state and then bury them in a third
18:33
state. Another was to
18:35
plan his crimes in conjunction with
18:37
travels. So it looked like he
18:39
would be too busy to commit
18:41
these crimes. You know, a great
18:43
example is, like I had
18:46
mentioned, he abducted Samantha Koenig just hours before
18:48
he went on a family cruise in
18:51
out of Louisiana. With the
18:54
couriers, he visited his mother days
18:56
before he abducted them in Indiana
18:58
and then visited his brothers immediately
19:01
following his murder of them in
19:03
Maine. So, you know, he
19:05
did follow the rules most of the time.
19:07
He would turn off his phone, he would
19:09
stop using credit cards, or he would use
19:11
credit cards in a way to place
19:14
him somewhere he actually wasn't. He would
19:17
often book several hotels in different areas
19:19
for the same night. So, you
19:21
know, it was more of an ideology
19:23
than a rule book. But again, the thing
19:26
about Keyes is he was more meticulous
19:28
in his planning than he was in the
19:30
actual execution of his crimes. Yeah, so
19:32
the one thing about the stalking
19:36
victims, I think when Israel describes
19:38
finding the house for the couriers that a lot of that
19:41
makes sense in my eyes.
19:43
I'm also a contractor. Dakota is also
19:45
a contractor and Israel Keyes was a
19:47
contractor. And you've worked in this home,
19:49
we've worked in this style home so
19:52
many times over the years that it's
19:54
very easy to identify the layout of
19:56
the house from just the exterior, even
19:59
like where the bath Maybe there's a difference of
20:01
where the bathroom may be, but you can even
20:03
identify that by the roof. So
20:05
I think the way that he describes it makes a
20:08
lot of sense. Like a typical
20:10
serial killer that would go and have
20:12
like the trolling phase and the stalking
20:14
phase. I think he mainly did that
20:16
more towards locations than
20:18
towards specific people.
20:21
Just trying to find, he said before that he's
20:24
always driving around looking for good places to do
20:26
stuff. And I think that's
20:28
really what his main focus
20:30
was. To try to
20:33
identify a good, something that
20:35
he feels familiar with as
20:37
a spot to abduct someone. And then so we've
20:40
reached out, we've been lucky enough to reach out to
20:42
Special Agent Ted Halla from the FBI. And
20:45
we asked him specifically if there
20:47
has been any evidence that Israel
20:49
has stocked any victims. And they said they've
20:52
had zero evidence for any
20:54
victims. And then we also
20:56
spoke with Julia Cowley from the consult. She's
20:58
a retired FBI profiler. And they talk a
21:00
little bit about this in one episode. They
21:03
also feel that he did
21:05
not stock victims. They covered the courier case
21:07
and the Samantha Kony
21:09
case separately. As two
21:11
separate cases, not even realizing that they're tied together.
21:13
And they still said that they don't think there's
21:15
any real connection, any stalking between
21:18
them. So that's kind of where I
21:20
get my point of view from. And I think that probably
21:23
one of the cool things about teaming up with
21:25
Josh and his team has been that we've been
21:28
able to share these different perspectives over
21:30
a group of people that are very familiar with the case.
21:32
So we're coming up with new ideas all the time.
21:34
It's been, I think, a really
21:36
good process, having people challenge
21:38
your ideas back and forth. Well,
21:41
like you said, he sometimes follows
21:43
rules and sometimes doesn't. So, but
21:46
it seems what you guys
21:48
were saying is he studied these locations.
21:51
And that was probably more important to him
21:53
than the actual victim. Yeah, I'm sure he,
21:55
the ideal situation is he could have his
21:57
perfect victim. But I think the. the
22:00
overarching thing is finding a location where
22:03
he would feel safe and comfortable to
22:05
abduct somebody. And a lot of
22:07
things that Josh had just said about the garage
22:09
having window access, there's a fan in the window.
22:11
So he had access to the garage very easily.
22:13
He had a spot in the backyard
22:15
where he could hide. And I think
22:17
just walking around the house, he was able to
22:19
identify that this was an older couple, what bedroom
22:22
they were staying in because they had a fan
22:24
on. It was a really muggy night, I guess,
22:26
really humid night. So I think
22:28
it was... I guess another thing
22:30
that was really important is the location where
22:32
he found the victims compared to the location where he's
22:35
going to take them. It was just
22:37
three right-hand turns, very quick access to get out
22:39
of that neighborhood on the highway and to the
22:41
farmhouse where he eventually sexually assaulted them
22:43
and then murdered them. And
22:45
that was an abandoned old
22:48
house, correct, where he took the victims?
22:51
Yeah. Yeah. He said that he had, I believe
22:53
it was for sale at the time. And if
22:55
I recall correctly, he had seen a listing for
22:57
it in a real estate magazine. And
23:01
his one
23:04
form of torture he was going to
23:07
use during those assaults and
23:09
the murders was having
23:11
one victim witness the other victim. He
23:14
never specifically said that, but that's
23:17
kind of my opinion. I believe that's a
23:20
general consensus. I'll let Joshua and Dakota weigh
23:22
in on their thoughts. This is something that
23:24
I think I find super fascinating because the
23:26
two times that he speaks about having a
23:29
couple, one male and one female, in
23:32
both situations, the male is killed premature of
23:34
the actual plan that he had in place.
23:38
There's a couple that he took in Washington
23:40
that he ended up hitting
23:42
the male over the head with a shovel
23:44
to quiet them down or to hopefully
23:46
just take them out for a minute, but it ended up killing
23:49
them. And then with Bill Currier,
23:51
as he was assaulting his wife
23:53
Lorraine, he came downstairs. Bill Currier was
23:55
trying to get loose and trying to
23:58
fight back and Israel eventually came. came
24:00
down and shot him with the silencer just
24:02
because he was too unruly during
24:04
that time period. So I'm really fascinated by
24:06
what the actual plan was and he didn't
24:08
really get into detail with that. Yeah, I
24:10
don't know. I'm just super fascinated
24:13
by what the possibilities are there and why
24:15
each time that he described it, both male
24:17
victims were killed before the actual
24:19
event. So Israel Keys has these
24:22
roles that he's trying to follow and
24:24
I think that makes them fascinating. The
24:27
other thing that's really fascinating about Israel
24:29
Keys is these hidden murder
24:32
kits. Can somebody
24:34
explain these? I think
24:36
it's important to, just in case people don't
24:38
know, to briefly explain what
24:40
a cash is, because I don't think
24:43
that everyone knows this. A cash
24:45
is a stored container of goods
24:47
hidden to be retrieved and used
24:49
at a later date. So you
24:52
usually relate this to survivalists cashing
24:54
food or a kind of
24:56
like a guerrilla wartime tactic of cashing
24:58
weapons and ammo. In this
25:00
case, we have a serial killer that's cashing
25:03
items used for abduction and murder and
25:05
he's cashing these items all across the United
25:08
States for him to retrieve at a later
25:10
date. The cash, for example, that was buried
25:12
in Essex, Vermont that was used in the
25:14
courier abduction and murder, that was that they
25:16
were abducted in 2011. It was placed two
25:19
years earlier
25:21
and we believe it coincides with another murder back
25:23
in April of 2009. It was buried
25:27
within the Essex city limits,
25:29
very close to a highway,
25:31
very close to apartments and
25:33
hotels and big box stores,
25:35
things like that. So these
25:38
things aren't way off in
25:40
the wilderness somewhere. They're somewhere very
25:43
accessible for him to retrieve and
25:45
use in a
25:47
very convenient way. He left this
25:49
kit in Essex there for
25:51
two years, came back for
25:54
it and although it was the
25:57
actual kit, the container was never contained.
26:00
recovered by the FBI, but
26:02
Keys gave a lot
26:04
of details on this
26:07
cash and how he used it,
26:09
which was really important for our
26:12
research and figuring out how
26:15
he used these things and what
26:17
exactly role they
26:19
played in his crimes. So we
26:22
have a ton of information about this cash and
26:24
how he used it. And we were able to
26:26
kind of look at, so there was
26:28
three caches that were recovered by the FBI. And
26:30
so we were able to look at the three
26:32
caches and kind of
26:34
identify markers and landmarks
26:37
that were
26:39
similar in each
26:41
situation. And so when
26:43
we talk about the kill kits, these
26:45
caches have items for, like I said,
26:47
abduction and murder. So we're talking about
26:51
weapons, knives, guns, ammunition. Then
26:53
you have binding materials like
26:55
zip ties, rope, duct
26:58
tape, things like that. And that
27:00
would be considered the kill kit.
27:02
I think that one thing
27:04
that we kind of learned about this
27:06
kit in particular was that the kit
27:08
in Essex in particular was that it
27:11
was in a wooden box. And
27:13
I'm not sure if I think
27:15
I kind of feel like this shows his
27:18
evolution a little bit when it comes to
27:20
strategy is that when
27:22
he came back to get this box
27:24
that had guns and ammunition in it,
27:27
and it had been in this kind of wetland
27:30
along the river for two years,
27:32
his guns were damaged
27:35
a little bit. They were rusty. And
27:37
so he had to take them back to his hotel,
27:39
which was only like a five minute
27:41
walk or a 10 minute walk away.
27:44
And so this cache was extremely accessible.
27:46
It was right in
27:48
the city. And so he had to go
27:51
and clean up his guns before
27:53
he approached whatever house or person he
27:55
was going to approach to abduct. And
27:57
so after that, he was able to
27:59
get the gun the courier abduction, he
28:02
reburied this cache in a new
28:05
container in another location. And that
28:07
new container was a five gallon
28:09
bucket with a sealed lid.
28:12
And so I'm not sure if the
28:14
box was just a container of opportunity
28:17
at the time. Back
28:19
in 2009, maybe it's the only container that
28:21
he could come up with
28:23
at that moment. Or maybe this shows a
28:25
bit of evolution where he realized, oh, I
28:27
need a better container
28:29
to protect these
28:31
materials so that when I get back to them, I
28:33
know they're going to be in working order. But
28:36
so he reburies this cache after
28:38
the courier abduction and murder in
28:41
a five gallon bucket in upstate New York. One
28:44
thing that Joshua and I have noticed
28:46
is that there's not only
28:48
one type of cache, but we can get
28:50
to that a little bit later if you
28:52
guys want. Well, and man cannot control mother
28:54
nature. So those wetlands may not
28:57
have been so wet when he first put
28:59
those items there to start with. And then
29:02
he learned along the way that it's,
29:04
it's, it's interesting to
29:06
go back and retrospectively watch and
29:08
learn how these guys learn and
29:11
adapt what it is that
29:13
they are doing to try to achieve their
29:16
horrific goals with
29:19
him being locked up. So he
29:21
gets caught and we're kind of,
29:24
they're really hoping to pull a lot of information out
29:26
of Israel keys. They
29:29
do kind of, uh, it sounds like to me,
29:31
they did like a very mind hunter sort
29:34
of thing where they played toward
29:36
the psychology of the situation and
29:38
of the perpetrator with
29:41
the idea of, oh, well, let's bring
29:43
in a female agent and
29:45
have her kind of lead these
29:48
interviews and steer the ship. And maybe he
29:50
will open up more to a lady
29:53
rather than, than
29:55
a male agent. Yeah.
29:57
I, you know, he was first. with
30:00
Alaska PD when they got
30:02
back to Anchorage, and there
30:04
was a detective Monique Dahl
30:07
who he had very clearly developed,
30:09
for lack of a better word,
30:11
a good rapport with. He was
30:14
a lot more candid with her
30:16
and chatty with her. And so
30:18
I think when the
30:20
Anchorage FBI kind of took the reins,
30:22
I think that was very critical
30:25
and apt in
30:27
their decision to put Jolene
30:30
Godin as the lead FBI
30:32
investigator on the case. As
30:34
far as we can tell, he never developed quite
30:36
that same rapport with Godin that he had with
30:39
Dahl, but I have found that
30:41
he is a lot more talkative when
30:43
she is in the room. Yeah, for
30:46
sure. And I think that he actually
30:48
requested early in the
30:50
first couple of interviews in Anchorage actually
30:54
requested to tell the
30:56
story of Samantha Koenig's
30:58
abduction specifically to Detective
31:02
Dahl and didn't
31:04
want many other people in the room. And so I
31:07
think that was a big tell for
31:10
the investigators to know, okay, he's going to
31:12
open up to a female more than he's
31:14
going to open up to a male. And
31:16
it's interesting because I've heard a lot of
31:18
takes on this that it was about control
31:21
or reliving his
31:23
experiences, but I think it's much more
31:25
simple than that. This was a guy who
31:27
was raised in a household with nine
31:29
women and then went on to have a
31:32
daughter and multiple girlfriends. And he
31:34
seemed to be just generally a lot
31:36
closer to women because of the way
31:38
and the environment that he was raised
31:40
in. So I don't really
31:43
think it has a great deal to
31:45
do with controlling or reliving and more
31:47
to do with just his comfort level.
31:49
Yeah, if he doesn't feel threatened by
31:51
the individual, he might be more
31:54
likely to be vulnerable. Yeah. And he even
31:56
said that he likes talking to women because
31:58
he... never really
32:00
had to be himself. And I think
32:03
that kind of came into play here, where
32:06
he got to be himself for
32:08
the first time with women in
32:10
a way that I think maybe
32:13
gave him power, but not in the way
32:15
that we generally tend to think in male-female
32:17
dynamics. Do you think that maybe he was
32:19
or felt
32:21
that a woman was
32:23
going to be more affected or
32:25
shocked by his retelling? Sometimes.
32:29
I think maybe that's the facade. I
32:33
think he wanted to talk to women because he
32:36
was more comfortable talking to women, but he wanted
32:38
the people in the room to believe that it
32:40
was about something else. But
32:44
I changed my mind daily on a
32:46
lot of this stuff, which I'm sure you guys do too. Yeah,
32:49
the confessions and the FBI interviews
32:51
is something that I
32:54
am completely fascinated with
32:57
here. What do you
32:59
think we learn about him? Because like you
33:01
just said, there's a part of him
33:04
that is also still playing a
33:06
game here. I
33:09
am constantly struck by just
33:12
the situation he's gotten himself
33:15
into where he is trying
33:17
to maintain control, but he's also excited
33:19
to talk about these things. I think
33:22
that push and pull of
33:24
his psyche is one of the most evident
33:28
and prolonged situations in these interviews.
33:30
This guy who is really torn
33:33
between his
33:35
internal desires and his need for control,
33:37
and it comes out. He'll say something and
33:39
then he'll immediately be like, oh fuck,
33:41
I shouldn't have said that. Not in
33:43
so many words, but he'll recoil or
33:45
retract or change the subject. I think
33:48
that's what I am most profoundly struck by.
33:50
I guess viewing him
33:53
as a human and not a
33:55
monster is you see these weird
33:57
idiosyncrasies and this weird dynamic where
33:59
he's in conflict with himself
34:01
throughout these entire interviews. Yeah.
34:04
And Ted Holla, we
34:06
asked Ted, if, especially to Ted
34:08
Holla, if he thought
34:11
that Keys was mostly honest
34:13
in interviews or if he thought he
34:15
was a liar or just what his opinion
34:17
of that was. And I
34:23
think that it was his answer
34:25
was spot on, which is, it's
34:27
very obvious when Keys
34:30
gets kind of backed into a corner where he
34:32
doesn't, he knows that they're
34:34
talking about information that is accurate and
34:37
he doesn't want to go any further. He kind
34:40
of recedes into himself and starts
34:43
mumbling and, you know,
34:45
his body language, it makes it really
34:47
obvious when he's either
34:49
being deceptive or flat out
34:52
lying. Yeah. And I've spoken
34:54
with and worked with quite
34:56
closely doctors, forensic
34:59
and criminal psychologists, doctors,
35:01
Ramsland and Kunkel, and they
35:04
both independently came to
35:06
that same conclusion. This is not a guy who's prone
35:08
to fantasy. This is not a guy who is a
35:10
natural born liar. For the most
35:12
part, he is telling as much truth as
35:14
he can without revealing whatever cards he's trying
35:17
to hold to his chest. Made
35:47
for families, parents can send money
35:49
and keep an eye on kids
35:51
spending and saving, building their money,
35:54
confidence, and lifelong financial literacy skills.
35:57
With the green light app, kids learn how
35:59
to save and. Invest and spend wisely
36:01
thanks to games that teach money
36:03
skills in a fun, accessible way.
36:06
The Greenlight app also includes a
36:08
chores feature where you can set
36:10
up one-time or reoccurring chores customized
36:12
to your family's needs and reward
36:14
kids with allowance for a job
36:17
well done. Millions of
36:19
parents and kids are learning about
36:21
money on Greenlight. It's the easy,
36:23
convenient way for parents to raise
36:25
financially smart kids and families to
36:27
navigate life together. I
36:29
love Greenlight. We send kids off to
36:31
school. They learn a lot of things.
36:34
They do not learn how to manage
36:36
their money. They're not teaching that.
36:39
This is a parent's job. Parents,
36:41
it is our job to teach
36:43
our kids to be financially responsible.
36:46
And the Greenlight app is
36:48
the tool that we all need
36:50
to successfully teach our children. That's
36:53
why I use it. That's why I love it.
36:55
Sign up for Greenlight today and get your first
36:57
month free. When you
36:59
go to greenlight.com/garage, that's
37:02
greenlight.com/garage to try Greenlight
37:04
for free. greenlight.com/garage.
37:09
This episode is brought to you
37:12
by FX's American Sports Story, Aaron
37:14
Hernandez. From executive
37:16
producer Ryan Murphy comes the
37:18
first installment of FX's American
37:21
Sports Story. The limited series
37:23
charts the rise and fall
37:26
of NFL superstar Aaron Hernandez
37:28
and explores the disparate strands
37:30
of his identity, his family,
37:33
his career, his suicide, and
37:35
their legacy in sports and
37:37
American culture. FX's American Sports
37:40
Story, Aaron Hernandez. All new
37:42
Tuesdays on FX. Stream
37:44
on Hulu. Hey,
37:47
Green Gobbler here. So you've got a clogged
37:49
drain in your bathroom. Water in the sinks
37:51
overstaying its welcome. You're spitting today's
37:53
toothpaste on top of yesterday's toothpaste. You
37:55
hope that it go away. Eh,
37:58
clogs don't just go away. I make
38:00
them go away. I'm Green Gobbler. The
38:02
only clog dissolver you need. I'm
38:05
bleach free, safe for your pipes, and
38:08
I work, guaranteed, or your money back.
38:11
Because I never met a clog that was
38:13
going to unclog itself. Green Gobbler. Let the
38:15
gobbler get it. And
38:21
he enjoyed being cryptic along the
38:24
way, it seems like. Like
38:37
you said, and at times when he's
38:40
a little more obvious, that's
38:42
when he wants to take the information back
38:44
or spin it a different way. I
38:47
think at some point, as to the captain's
38:49
point, that he's playing
38:51
this game of I
38:54
got a whole lot of information or some
38:57
of it maybe even made up. But
38:59
I have a whole lot of information that
39:01
these people really want to know. And
39:04
if I deliver it in a certain way, in a
39:06
certain manner, I might just
39:08
live forever. Because people will continue
39:10
to analyze this for a
39:12
very long time. And as
39:14
I'm sure you guys have seen, and Josh, you've
39:17
pointed out on your show, that
39:19
some people analyze this and really
39:22
make something out of nothing. But
39:26
he opened that door to
39:29
allow that to happen. Yeah, I
39:31
agree and disagree. I
39:34
think that's his worst nightmare, is people
39:37
analyzing his words ad nauseam in
39:40
a public setting like we're doing
39:42
today. I think that's his
39:44
worst nightmare. His greatest
39:46
thing with control was that he didn't
39:49
want people to know what he did or who
39:51
he was. I think he
39:53
knew that the more he gave away, the more
39:55
likely he was to
39:57
become infamous. I
40:00
think up until the end, that's not what
40:02
he wanted at all. He wanted to quietly
40:04
die in prison without anyone
40:06
ever talking about him. I named my show
40:08
after a quote from him where
40:10
he said, you know, I don't want to be caught up in
40:12
all this true crime bullshit. So I
40:15
think, you know, that's what he wanted
40:17
and why he was careful about what
40:19
he was saying. And I think his strategy
40:21
was to be very thoughtful and deliberate
40:23
about the language he was using so that
40:26
he wasn't necessarily lying, but he was
40:28
lying by omission or concealing things
40:30
through language. Because
40:32
I think even he knew and it's abundantly
40:35
clear to anyone who's watched these tapes, like
40:37
he is a terrible liar. Yeah. And
40:39
he, I think he was like, kind
40:42
of learning, learning the interrogation game. I
40:44
don't, I don't, he didn't go into
40:46
it prepared for that. I
40:48
don't think he kind of handed over the
40:50
courier story on a silver platter when he
40:53
didn't really need to. I believe
40:55
that he thought that the FBI
40:57
was going to be able to connect him
40:59
to that abduction and murder when
41:02
they might not have. And
41:05
so I think he definitely regretted that later
41:07
on. And so he
41:09
was trying to figure out what
41:11
information he could give and keep
41:13
the FBI happy and get what
41:15
he wanted. But he realized that he
41:17
didn't have to give as much as he thought he did. So
41:20
we think maybe he thought they're going to
41:22
find out anyway. Maybe I have a chance
41:24
here to control the
41:27
narrative and
41:29
tell it my way rather
41:31
than how everything
41:35
went down to the T. Yeah.
41:37
I think that, and again, going
41:39
back to his internal desires,
41:41
which is like, oh, I can talk about this stuff.
41:43
So like, I will control the
41:45
narrative. I get to talk about these things that I did
41:47
and brag about these things that I did only because
41:50
I have a sense that you're going to
41:52
find out anyway. And
41:54
he talked about less than a dozen victims. And I
41:56
think that is very much a product
41:59
of this. he thought once
42:01
the FBI looked at his computer, they
42:03
could tie him to 11 victims. Now, whether
42:06
there were more is up for
42:08
debate, but I think that's what
42:10
he went into those interrogations originally
42:12
thinking, like, okay, they have my
42:14
computer. Who can they tie
42:16
me to? I'm going to control the narrative.
42:18
It seems like a fine line, too, that
42:21
he was walking, because the way I always
42:23
kind of took keys with the information that
42:25
he was giving and what he was willing
42:27
to talk about with
42:29
the authorities. It seemed to
42:31
me, my opinion was that he wanted to
42:34
tell some of these stories and
42:36
some of the horrific acts that he did,
42:39
either being a form of
42:41
confession or a form of
42:43
bragging or maybe a mashing
42:46
of the two. But then
42:48
he also has this other side
42:50
of him where it's like, oh, my
42:53
daughter one day is going to hear
42:55
these things. My daughter at some point
42:57
will become aware of what
43:00
kind of monster and just how disgusting
43:02
I really am. So I
43:05
always thought he was walking this weird, very
43:08
conflicting, fine line of
43:10
what information he
43:12
wanted to give, as
43:15
well as what was going to be what people thought
43:17
of him in the end. You can hear him actually
43:20
grapple with that in real time
43:22
during the interrogations. He talks about how
43:24
he has to get
43:26
comfortable with actually starting to talk to people
43:28
about these things because he's had cut them
43:30
inside his entire life. So
43:33
it's really interesting. The interrogations
43:35
are absolutely fascinating. It's like
43:37
over 30 hours where
43:39
they'll just break down so many parts
43:42
of his crimes, the arsons,
43:44
the burglaries, the sexual assaults,
43:46
the murders, and they'll
43:48
get all these little tiny pieces here
43:50
and there where he's speaking
43:52
freely at one moment and it
43:55
doesn't seem like he realizes that they'll be able
43:57
to connect those things together later on.
43:59
down the line. But then at
44:02
the same time, it's fascinating because he will talk
44:04
freely, but he will distance himself.
44:06
Like he very rarely says rape or
44:08
murder or kill. And the few times
44:11
he does say the word rape, he
44:13
gets very sheepish about it.
44:15
And I think that goes back to like,
44:18
in many ways, he was raised to be the caretaker
44:20
of his family. And it's a role that I
44:22
think I will never know how
44:24
he felt about it, but I think it's a role that
44:26
gave him purpose. And I
44:28
think that comes into play when he's talking about these
44:31
things where it's like, I want to talk about what
44:33
I've done, but I still have significant amount of shame
44:35
about it. And I want to
44:37
protect my family. And we could argue all
44:39
day about the intentions of protecting his family,
44:42
but I do think some of them
44:44
were pure. I think he
44:46
did care as much as someone like him
44:48
can about the people in his life and
44:50
whether that care comes from narcissism
44:52
or a more, I guess, typical
44:54
care, we'll never know. It's
44:57
so bizarre because you get these
44:59
guys and what they're
45:01
willing to admit to. And then the things,
45:04
the same equally disgusting acts
45:07
that they're embarrassed about where Sam
45:10
Little, he admits, he
45:12
tells police and investigators, FBI,
45:14
that he murdered over 90
45:16
people. But if you accuse him
45:18
of rape, he would get very
45:20
angry and very worked up and say,
45:22
I may
45:24
have killed her, but I didn't rape
45:27
her. He instantly, he's angry at the
45:29
accusation that he would rape somebody. All
45:31
these interviews and confessions
45:34
and cryptic messages and what have
45:36
you all leads up
45:38
to his eventual suicide, Israel keys
45:41
suicide. Yeah. His body was
45:43
found at 557 AM,
45:46
December 12th, 2012. And basically
45:51
what happened is that they found him in
45:53
his cell with a razor blade that was
45:55
attached to a pencil, I believe, and he
45:57
used that to slit his wrists. And
46:00
he also tried to hang
46:02
himself with his sheets, I believe. There's
46:05
a great article. Let's see if I
46:07
can find it here. It's the untold
46:09
story behind Israel Keys' jailhouse suicide. And
46:11
it talks about, it's from the Anchorage
46:14
Daily News, and it
46:16
talks about how the DOC
46:18
officer was actually removed
46:20
from position after they found the body because
46:22
there was alleged that the officer was reading
46:24
a book only 25 feet away from Keys
46:27
while he committed suicide. So I read the
46:29
article because it's super interesting. So
46:31
Israel Keys had been hinting at suicide for a
46:34
while during the interrogation, saying things like, I
46:36
don't need you, I can
46:38
do this on my own. And he
46:40
was getting very tired with the cumbersome
46:42
legal process. And it seems like
46:45
it was more just an opportunity where he was
46:47
able to find a
46:49
razor, a disposable razor, and
46:52
then eventually kill himself in what
46:54
they call the ritualistic suicide. Now,
46:58
one of the strangest things, maybe the
47:00
reason that they call it ritualistic suicide,
47:02
is that he wrote in blood on
47:04
a cell wall, and
47:06
he wrote the word caracol in
47:08
big letters in blood across the cell wall.
47:10
And this is also, we've confirmed this in
47:12
the case file. We know it's
47:14
kind of been up to bait, up for
47:16
debate whether it was Belize, but caracol is
47:18
a spot in Belize. We're
47:20
kind of excited because we're going to be
47:23
speaking with the retired FBI profiler
47:25
Julia Cowley about a suicide note.
47:28
Because he also left a note that they found
47:30
underneath him that was, you can kind of piece
47:32
some of it together, but some of it was
47:35
erased by his blood. So
47:37
we're going to sit down with her and go
47:39
over the suicide note and how that
47:42
relates to caracol. And also on
47:44
October 20th, we'll be at the
47:46
Berkshire Podcast Festival. So
47:48
plug for you, Josh, releasing a brand
47:51
new piece of information that will be connected
47:53
to everything that we're super excited
47:55
about. But what was found in his cell,
47:57
so he commits suicide in
47:59
his cell. cell, what do we
48:01
find in his cell? Basically, just
48:05
him. The only thing that was left
48:07
in his cell was just a typical item in
48:09
his cell, and then his body with the suicide
48:11
note and the writing on the wall. So
48:14
that's the only thing that was, there was
48:16
no other items discovered other than the razor
48:19
that he had snuck into his cell. But
48:21
there is some misconception around other
48:24
materials taken from a cell prior to
48:26
his suicide. Yes,
48:28
that's correct. So in July of
48:30
2012, they actually found 12 drawings in his
48:33
cell, 12 individual
48:39
drawings, 11 of them were skulls
48:42
that were basically finger painted in
48:44
blood. They each had an upside
48:46
down cross on their forehead. And
48:48
then the 12th drawing was actually
48:50
a drawing of Baphomet
48:55
with an upside down pentagram. And on
48:57
one of the skull drawings, it had
48:59
the words, we are one. But
49:01
that was not actually, those drawings were not found
49:04
when he committed suicide, those drawings were found months
49:06
before. And that's basically around the time that he
49:08
started to hint that he would just take his
49:10
own life instead of going through
49:12
the legal process. So we
49:14
have these drawings found before
49:17
his suicide. They go
49:19
into the cell, they find him, they find
49:21
a suicide note, and then a writing on
49:23
the wall. Do we have the information
49:25
of what was in the suicide note and what
49:27
was written on the wall? Yeah, the suicide note
49:29
has been released to the public. So
49:31
you can look that up online. And it's more
49:33
of a, it's less of a suicide note and
49:36
more of a note about how much he hates
49:39
America and Americans is the way that
49:41
I view it. He also, he did
49:44
write what the FBI is calling a suicide
49:46
note, or more of a goodbye note to
49:49
his family. And that was recovered again, as
49:51
well, much further before, much
49:53
earlier before his, his
49:55
actual eventual death. So
49:57
this, this suicide note was more of a
49:59
goodbye. letter to his family, kind of letting
50:01
them know what roughly what had
50:04
happened that he did do these things. And
50:06
then a new piece of information that the FBI
50:08
told us is that he there
50:11
were actually two separate letters. So there's the
50:13
goodbye letter. And then there's also a note
50:16
that, especially to holla describes
50:18
as a really odd document. It's an
50:20
all block letters. And
50:22
it basically starts to describe all of
50:24
his victims and what
50:27
he did them in very graphic detail. He
50:30
described, well, let me, he
50:32
doesn't describe all his victims, he describes six
50:34
victims. And they believe that he
50:36
was interrupted while writing this note. So unfortunately,
50:38
they don't have the full details of all
50:41
of his crimes. But
50:43
in this document, it's basically just
50:45
goes into extreme detail. And there's
50:47
no evidentiary value, evidentiary value listed,
50:50
it's really just kind
50:52
of, I don't know if it's just
50:55
for his own personal use,
50:57
or something that it was eventually going
50:59
to give to the FBI. What's really
51:01
telling about the, the skulls,
51:03
the and the timing of that is, you
51:06
know, the DOC, the Anchorage DOC and
51:09
the oversight within the prison
51:11
was it seems like not
51:14
it wasn't done very well. I mean,
51:16
a source I have a source that
51:18
worked for the Anchorage DOC and he told me that after
51:22
keys was able to commit suicide that
51:24
the DOC re restructured how they do
51:26
sweeps how they do cell sweeps. And
51:28
he referred to some of the old protocols
51:30
as archaic. He I have
51:33
him quoted as saying, I don't think we had
51:35
the infrastructure to deal with someone like keys. Just
51:38
the fact that he was able to, you know,
51:41
these these skulls were
51:43
drawn months before his
51:46
suicide, meaning the keys was able to
51:49
self harm long before he actually took
51:51
his own life in December of 2012.
51:53
This source in the DOC says
51:56
that we would be shocked to know what kind
51:58
of contraband is floating around in in prisons,
52:01
and he referred to describe
52:03
things like drugs, weapons, drones,
52:06
convection, ovens, pornography, and
52:08
the list just kind of went on. And so it's not
52:10
a stretch to think that Israel could have gotten his hands
52:12
on the items he needed to
52:14
commit suicide. And I think that once he
52:17
realized that he could gain
52:19
access to those items, that that's
52:21
when the interrogations with
52:23
the FBI started to really break
52:26
down and he realized that
52:28
he didn't need them to be able to
52:30
accomplish his goal. Well, and
52:32
the FBI seems to be pretty clear
52:36
about their findings and
52:39
their statement to the general public about
52:41
these writings that were found under
52:44
his body in his cell
52:46
that they had to clean up, because it's covered in his
52:48
blood at this point. Their statement is
52:51
the FBI concluded there was no hidden
52:53
code or message in the writings. Further,
52:56
it was determined that the writings do not
52:58
offer any investigative clues or leads as
53:01
to the identity of other
53:03
possible victims. And we've been
53:05
given a little kind of insight
53:07
into some of the writings
53:09
that haven't been released. And it sounds like
53:11
that there possibly is some
53:14
investigative value in that. He
53:18
had talked about some scenery at specific
53:20
locations, things
53:23
like that, that would at least maybe
53:26
not identify the location completely,
53:29
but it would at least give you some sort of
53:32
guide or bullet points to
53:34
investigate by, to
53:37
be like, if he describes
53:39
a certain piece of scenery
53:42
that you know, okay, you
53:44
can eliminate some of these other locations, things
53:46
like that. So I think that there is
53:48
some value in those writings. Do you believe
53:50
the suicide was just to not
53:52
go through the process to not be in a cage
53:57
or was it maybe also that
54:00
he knew the longer he was there,
54:02
the more information he'd be giving law
54:04
enforcement. I think it's both. I think
54:06
that it's a control, has everything to
54:08
do with control. I think that he
54:10
knew that he was, the
54:13
longer he was in there and talking to the FBI,
54:15
the more information he would give up. Also,
54:17
he at one point said that
54:20
he was never planning
54:22
on going to prison. He thought for
54:24
sure that he would be killed before
54:26
he was arrested. Also, the timing of
54:28
the suicide is interesting to me for
54:30
that reason because I want to say
54:32
two weeks before he died by suicide,
54:34
he was scheduled to help the FBI
54:36
do a ground search in Tupperlate where
54:39
he claimed that he buried
54:41
one of his victims. He did not show up to
54:43
that meeting, so they rescheduled.
54:46
I believe the date that they had
54:48
rescheduled to do this search would
54:51
have been the day after he died by
54:53
suicide. I've always been curious about whether
54:56
that timing was specific and
54:58
intentional. A block-lettered note, it
55:01
did describe the murders of William and
55:03
Lorraine Currier and also Samantha
55:05
Koenig. They know that it
55:07
was directly connected to specific
55:10
murders that he had done. As
55:12
Dakota was just talking about how there is some
55:14
evidentiary value in them, there's also
55:16
a description of another female
55:18
that was taken who had a very
55:21
rich grandmother and an old
55:24
car. Maybe it was an old
55:26
rich grandparent, I could be wrong
55:29
in that. No, it was a
55:31
wealthy grandmother and an old car,
55:34
old make sedan. I forget the specifics. There
55:37
were two clear, I
55:39
don't know if clues is the right word, but
55:41
indicators of a victim. Let's
55:44
talk possible victims. Let's
55:46
just go around the table. If
55:49
you had to guess, how many victims do
55:51
you think Israel keys had? I
55:53
mean, my specific opinion changes
55:55
all the time, but I would say
55:57
I generally believe
56:00
there's probably between 15 and 25. CB
56:02
Yeah. I go
56:05
all over the place with it. I can't
56:08
land on a number really. I know that the
56:11
FBI landed on 11, but they
56:13
did so in kind of an arbitrary
56:15
way. Keys knows that the FBI
56:18
landed on 11, and then
56:20
he draws 11 skulls. There's
56:22
a lot of conversation or
56:24
different points of view on the 11
56:27
skulls and what that meant. Was
56:30
he just kind of trying to confirm
56:32
that for the FBI and make sure
56:34
that they stuck to 11? Does it
56:36
actually represent his
56:39
full catalog of victims or
56:42
some people say it even represents his
56:44
family, like his brothers and sisters and
56:46
things like that. It's
56:48
very possible that he was just kind of
56:50
toying with the FBI and saying, yeah, you
56:52
landed on 11 in this kind
56:55
of silly way because he
56:57
never actually said it. I don't
57:00
have a number. CB Okay. So a question. So
57:03
is there a possibility that Israel Keys
57:05
believes that they thought there's 11 and
57:07
then he drew the 11 skulls? Is
57:09
that what you're stating? CB That's always
57:11
been my opinion. CB Yeah, that's a
57:13
high possibility. CB And then so we
57:16
have 11 skulls and one pentagram
57:19
basically. What do you
57:21
think this means? CB
57:23
The 12th picture was a picture of Beaufamette,
57:26
the horned goat. You
57:28
might remember, I think it was on the cover
57:30
of a Stephen King novel at one point. That's
57:32
I think where I first saw it when I
57:35
was a teenager or something
57:37
like that. So people
57:39
think that that represents him and then the
57:41
11 skulls represent his
57:43
victims. And so it's
57:45
very possible that he was just trying to confirm
57:47
11 with the FBI.
57:49
CB I kind of am sticking with
57:51
11 until we have more information. I
57:54
do agree with Josh though that I
57:57
think that Keys thought that they could
57:59
find 11 victims. on his computer, so that's why
58:01
he stuck with 11. But until
58:04
we have more information, it's very
58:07
easy to be like, oh, he killed tons
58:09
of people. And he said things like, Canadians
58:12
don't count, things like
58:15
that. That would make you think that he
58:17
killed a lot more than he did. But
58:19
I think the thing that is really exciting about
58:21
this case is that there's so
58:24
much information out there that eventually
58:26
we're going to get to a point where we can
58:28
figure out one of his patterns. I think once we
58:30
figure out one specific pattern, I think it's just going
58:32
to blow the entire case open and
58:34
we'll be able to really tell how many victims
58:36
he really had. So
58:49
much more to get to, so
58:51
many fascinating things, so much to
58:54
unpack. Make sure you join
58:56
us back here in the garage. Until then,
58:58
be good, be kind, and
59:01
hold there. Got
59:40
a hunch about this football season? Put it
59:42
in play with FanDuel's easy to use app.
59:44
Right now, new customers can bet $5 and
59:46
get 200 in bonus bets. Nothing
59:49
can stop this team. Sounds
59:52
like someone's got an optimistic hunch. 21
59:56
plus a president in Virginia. Must be first online real
59:58
money wager. $5 deposit. required. Bonus issued
1:00:00
is not a withdrawal bonus that expires
1:00:03
seven days after receipt. Restrictions apply. See
1:00:05
full terms at fanboy.com/sportsbook. Gambling problem? Call
1:00:07
1-800-GAMBLER.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More