Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
Hey everybody!
0:19
Hi friends, well from beautiful Salt
0:22
Lake City, Utah. It's Thank
0:24
God I'm Atheist. A podcast exploring
0:26
religion, politics, and current events from
0:28
a couple atheists just trying to
0:30
live our lives in these United
0:32
States. I'm Frank Feldman. And
0:34
I'm Dan Beecher. And coming
0:36
up on the show today Dan.
0:40
Oh God. Lies,
0:42
lies, and the liar.
0:46
Okay, you know what? We're
0:49
gonna trigger warn everybody. And
0:52
I don't know what to trigger warn the most.
0:54
Is it just that we're gonna be talking about
0:56
Richard Dawkins? I'm triggered. Trigger
0:59
warning on that one. But even
1:01
more so that he had
1:03
things to say about trans people again. Yeah.
1:07
Not good. Not
1:09
great. Not. That's
1:11
at the end of the show. And we are going, and
1:14
don't worry trans friends, we're going to
1:16
be definitely not on
1:19
his side. Dear
1:21
God no. Spoiler alert. Dear God
1:24
no. Yeah.
1:27
Oh, all right Dan. Yeah.
1:30
I have a story coming to us from the Church
1:32
of England. Oh, I've heard of
1:34
that. Yeah, nice
1:37
outfit normally, right? They
1:39
got a king up at the top. Yeah,
1:42
they tend to be harmless.
1:44
Are they? No,
1:47
no, that's not right. They're still Christians. Yeah.
1:51
For Christ's sake. Yeah, they're Christians. What
1:53
are they? They're something. But
1:55
they kind of, they sort of seem
1:58
nicer maybe? Maybe it's just the end. accents
2:00
I don't know I'm not sure no
2:02
they are nicer definitely like you know
2:05
it's it's definitely like
2:07
if you're ordering Thai
2:09
food their spice level is zero
2:12
well yeah like
2:15
it's still it's still too much
2:17
flavor for some but like for
2:19
the most part it's still yeah
2:22
okay that's that that's nice so
2:24
Dan with all of
2:27
that sort of setting this this up I
2:29
guess it sort of makes sense that
2:32
when faced with a
2:36
priest more than
2:38
just a priest canon he's
2:41
a cannon cannon Andrew
2:43
Hindley right that's that's the
2:45
title yeah I think he's
2:48
he's like maybe a must
2:50
be a priest he's a priest he's a priest
2:54
musket yeah I
2:57
think there should be I think all of
2:59
their titles should be should be gun really
3:01
okay yeah but they under bus they are
3:03
not they're not so
3:07
when they had a touchy
3:09
feely priest by
3:12
the name of canon Andrew Hindley
3:16
who was definitely
3:19
a risk to children
3:21
and young people you know
3:23
like how do you handle this how does an
3:25
organization deal with this we know
3:27
how the Catholics have done it they just sort
3:29
of move people around right well
3:33
the the C of E
3:36
they they pay them a
3:40
six-figure settlement and pushed him out the
3:42
door oh
3:44
that poor guy the poor guy they he
3:46
had there were five
3:48
police investigations into this guy and
3:51
they couldn't get anything to stick
3:53
right there was the
3:55
time that in 1991 where there
4:00
was alleged sex with a 16
4:02
year old boy. I'm
4:04
sorry. 17 year old boy. That
4:07
makes it better. There we go. The
4:10
age of consent at the time was 21. So it
4:12
was definitely, it
4:15
was statutory. Then
4:17
in 2000, after the age of consent had
4:20
been dropped 16, he
4:23
decided to sleep with a
4:25
15 year old boy. Of course. It's
4:28
no fun if it's legal. That's
4:31
yeah, that's, that's the problem with lowering the
4:33
age of consent apparently for some people. Right.
4:37
Is they got, now they're just going to go,
4:39
go younger. Boy, maybe
4:41
we should trigger warned this one.
4:45
Look, our show should just come
4:47
with a blanket trigger warning. So
4:51
both investigations, both of those investigations were
4:53
dropped after the alleged
4:55
victims and
4:57
the cannon denied
4:59
the allegations. So, okay, whatever.
5:03
And then there were the, there was
5:05
the time in 2001 where
5:08
there was an allegation of sexual assault
5:10
of a teenage boy three years that
5:12
happened three years earlier. And
5:14
let's see, he was the cannon.
5:17
Hindley was accused of
5:19
giving the alleged victim alcohol and encouraging
5:21
him to watch
5:24
pornography and then like,
5:26
you know, touching and groping and
5:28
whatnot. And 2006 allegations
5:32
over remarks made to a 15 year old boy.
5:35
And then in 2018 allegations of sexual
5:37
assault at a party in the
5:40
cathedral garden. This man
5:42
was out of control. He
5:44
really was. He
5:47
was really, really truly out of
5:49
control. But the, so they're trying
5:51
desperately to get rid of
5:53
him. It
5:55
got so bad that the archbishop
5:57
of Canterbury, um, back
6:01
to plan to close this
6:03
guy's cathedral if
6:05
the priest returned to work. Why
6:08
can't they fire this guy? What's
6:10
going on? Well, wrongful termination, I
6:13
presume. Let's see. I
6:15
feel like if you've got that
6:17
many police investigations, I
6:20
feel like you've got grounds to terminate. I
6:23
know, I guess, but nothing. I guess you need
6:25
a conviction. I don't know, what do you? Right?
6:29
How bad does it have to be? But
6:32
the C of E, they
6:34
just kept trying. They tried multiple times
6:36
to pay him to leave, but
6:40
he just wouldn't. As recently as 2022, he
6:42
was offered 240,000 pounds. Good
6:47
move. But we do not know
6:50
how much he took this
6:52
time, how much they offered and he actually did
6:54
take because he
6:57
and the church both signed non-disclosure
6:59
agreements. What's it gonna take
7:01
for you to stop raping these kids? We'll
7:03
pay you. I don't know. Good
7:07
Lord. I'm just gonna stay. I'm
7:09
staying. We're paying the criminals
7:11
now. Yeah, yeah. Please leave the
7:13
church. We'll pay
7:16
you. So the Church of England
7:18
is saying that this payment was
7:21
in order to settle legal action that
7:23
was brought by the priest, but
7:26
yeah, it's in light of
7:29
the fact that
7:32
the church has tried several times to
7:35
pay him off. It's just like, it's
7:37
just wild. There
7:40
you go. Yeah, so apparently-
7:42
Apparently there's good money in
7:45
bad behavior. Yeah. And
7:49
thanks C of E, like that's fucked
7:52
up. Yeah, you've really
7:54
sent a strong message with that one, C
7:56
of E. Good job. Well, and because it-
7:58
What? It
8:00
feels like to me that
8:03
because churches and, you
8:05
know, in general are so
8:08
weird about their predatory priests
8:10
and clergy that they
8:13
probably missed multiple opportunities to
8:15
make some of these allegations
8:17
actually stick. Right. Because
8:22
they were probably had their
8:24
own internal problems with reporting,
8:26
right? Yeah. And people
8:28
feeling like, well, I don't want to rat
8:30
him out because, you know, he's the priest.
8:32
He's the priest. And, you know, like
8:37
if they were just good on the issue
8:39
to begin with, they could have saved themselves,
8:42
you know, three
8:44
or four hundred thousand pounds. Several hundred thousand
8:46
pounds. Yeah, exactly. So probably
8:48
half a million. Who knows? It's
8:51
yeah, it's absurd. I
8:53
mean, here's the one thing that I will say.
8:56
It is possible that
8:59
by doing this, they
9:02
actually in a very fucked up
9:04
way protected children. I
9:06
and going forward.
9:08
Going forward. Yes. And if
9:11
that is, yes, not the ones who
9:13
have already had the problem, but like
9:16
like they may have done a really
9:20
lousy action for
9:23
a good effect. And
9:25
that effect is like the protection of kids.
9:29
And so I'm not going to get all
9:31
the way down their throats about it because,
9:35
yeah, I mean, maybe they kind
9:37
of did the right thing sort
9:39
of in the end.
9:43
Yes. But I think it's it's
9:45
it's just testament to how poorly they've handled. They probably
9:47
handled it up to this point. Yeah, right. What
9:51
it means is that there's they have
9:53
they have no systems that
9:56
could have ended this the
9:58
second it like. It's
10:01
it even seemed like it might be a
10:03
problem. Yeah, they've got no system in place
10:05
for that whatsoever And one can
10:07
only hope that they're smart enough to now try
10:09
to put some of those in place if for
10:11
no other reason Just to save themselves some money
10:14
Yeah, so when the next that when the next time
10:17
And comes along yeah if
10:19
one you could hope that you could
10:21
go ahead and hope that I've I
10:24
am gonna hope it I'm hoping
10:27
and the history and I
10:30
have little hope I'm on
10:32
that front damn okay great Well,
10:35
I am going to fly us back
10:37
over the pond to Oklahoma here
10:40
in these United States That's
10:42
a culture shock Yeah,
10:45
yeah You listeners in the
10:47
UK come come to Oklahoma at some point see
10:49
what see what you think uh
10:54
Now this is this is a follow-up
10:56
so We had
10:58
reported we had talked about a months
11:01
ago a plan
11:03
that they had in Oklahoma to have
11:07
to fund through
11:09
public funds a Charter
11:13
school that was that
11:15
was an online Catholic
11:18
charter school. Yeah And
11:22
and that was dumb and bad
11:24
and very clearly against
11:27
our like countries
11:30
Constitution and But
11:33
it turns out it was also against the
11:35
Oklahoma State Constitution and
11:38
the Oklahoma Supreme Court Ruled
11:40
seven to one to block The
11:44
state from from opening this school
11:47
So set it was set to happen like
11:50
this week or this like this
11:52
year and the
11:57
the Charter
11:59
school board There's apparently a
12:01
charter school board. Took until now
12:04
to vote, to
12:08
actually obey that ruling by the
12:11
Supreme Court and officially nullify their contract
12:13
to open this school. So
12:21
they came down
12:23
to the wire and apparently, the attorney
12:26
general of the state, who
12:28
seemed like he actually cares about the law, unlike
12:32
the attorney general to the state, just
12:34
to the south, because the Texas attorney general is
12:36
just the
12:39
most corrupt human on the earth. But
12:43
apparently, Oklahoma attorney general, Gentner
12:46
Drummond, actually thinks that, church
12:51
state separation is real, and he's not really a
12:53
real person. And
12:56
should probably happen, et cetera.
12:58
And so he threatened to, he
13:03
basically threatened individual board members,
13:06
if they voted to
13:09
go against the Supreme Court. He
13:12
basically threatened with citations that
13:14
could have been like six months in
13:16
jail and a $500 fine. Oh,
13:19
shut up, really? So
13:21
they fell in line. Magically,
13:24
there was a unanimous vote to
13:27
actually obey the law on this one. But
13:32
of course, they've decided to appeal their
13:34
decision. They
13:37
haven't, they've promised they will appeal. They
13:39
haven't filed an appeal to
13:41
the Supreme Court of the United
13:43
States, rather than just that, their
13:46
dinky home state Supreme Court. That's not
13:48
enough for them. And
13:50
who knows? I mean, they're probably
13:52
right. The Supreme Court of
13:54
the US will say, do
13:56
what you want, you know, because we got
13:58
idiots. it's in our current
14:01
Supreme Court. It's just, they're sort of just
14:04
Supreme Court and for Jesus up there, so
14:06
who knows? You say
14:08
they're idiots, I think they know what they're doing. They
14:12
know what they're doing. Okay, fine. Retract
14:14
idiots and replace it with bad
14:17
jurists. There you go. Ding, ding, ding,
14:19
ding, ding. People who do not care
14:22
about the law, only about Jesus. Ding,
14:24
ding, ding, ding, ding. And sort of
14:26
like being in the can for a
14:30
sort of right-wing Christian
14:32
nationalism. Ding, ding, ding,
14:34
ding, ding. Yeah, totally. There you go.
14:36
All right. Well, Dan, actually,
14:39
my story, my next story, is
14:43
related to the story that
14:45
you just told. This
14:48
is serendipitous.
14:54
This is actually pretty great. So did
14:57
you actually say the name Ryan Walters,
14:59
State Superintendent Ryan Walters? I
15:01
didn't. I do have a quote from him. He
15:03
did have a tweet related to him. I didn't
15:05
really hear. Shall I read it? Yeah, yeah, yeah,
15:07
yeah. Just a little. So here's what he had
15:10
to say about my thing and then you can
15:12
move on to whatever you're thinking about. This is
15:14
his big pet project, this guy, right? He loves
15:16
this thing. Oh, Jesusifying the
15:18
schools is the only thing he cares about.
15:20
So here's what he had to say. He
15:22
tweeted, the Oklahoma Supreme
15:25
Court has failed Oklahomans in
15:27
their latest dismal ruling against
15:29
parents and kids. They
15:32
have chosen the path of
15:34
liberal extremism and, hold
15:37
on, Marxism. By
15:41
depriving parents of a choice, it's
15:44
shameful but predictable from a
15:46
failed judicial system. Well, we
15:48
agree on that. The
15:51
judicial system is largely in
15:53
the shit can but there you go. They
15:56
do not represent conservative Oklahoma values.
16:00
Which is what he's pissed off about. So,
16:02
yeah, so he's been all about this like
16:06
online Catholic school and it getting, you know,
16:08
state funds and all that. He
16:12
also was responsible for his
16:16
order. I guess he's not, of course he's responsible
16:18
for it. It was his order that
16:22
the Bible be placed in every
16:25
classroom in the state of Oklahoma. Right. And
16:27
that teachers had to like... Not that he
16:30
had the authority to do that. And that
16:32
they... Boy, did he order it. And that
16:34
they had to incorporate Biblical teachings into the
16:38
curriculum, right? So
16:42
that's state superintendent Ryan Walters.
16:46
Well, it
16:49
turns out that
16:52
some... The Oklahoma state
16:54
legislature may not be too stoked
16:56
about this guy. Now,
17:00
of course, he would expect that from the Democrats. But
17:04
21 Republican
17:06
lawmakers have
17:08
signed on to a
17:11
letter requesting an investigation
17:14
into state superintendent Ryan Walters, which
17:17
could potentially lead to impeachment.
17:22
Now, this is a procedural thing that's
17:25
happening right now. House
17:28
Speaker Charles McColl said
17:32
that if the
17:34
legislators could get at
17:37
least 51 Republicans to
17:39
sign the letter, that
17:43
he would consider the request. And
17:47
so I'm not quite sure
17:49
legally what the whole process
17:52
would be, but according to
17:54
Melody Huckabee Rowlett, who
17:57
is a political science professor, professor
18:00
at the University of Oklahoma. Let's
18:04
see, according to her.
18:11
For this kind of thing in Oklahoma,
18:13
you don't really need to prove that
18:15
a crime was committed, apparently, if
18:19
they were to impeach him, right?
18:21
Or to have and they doesn't
18:23
have to be a crime for
18:26
the Senate to remove Walters from office.
18:29
And this is her quote, what rises
18:31
to level of impeachment is a little
18:33
different. It's broader alleged
18:36
incompetence, alleged
18:39
willful neglect of duties. It doesn't
18:41
have to be high crimes, misdemeanors.
18:45
So there
18:47
is a chance that Mr.
18:53
Walters could find himself
18:55
being kicked out of office. Now, of course,
18:59
the Republicans, they're shy of there's
19:02
still 30 legislators shy
19:04
of, you
19:07
know, taking it to the next step
19:09
of the request being considered.
19:13
But it would be
19:15
it would definitely it's already signaling to
19:18
Ding Dong McGee. Shut
19:21
the fuck up. Shut up.
19:23
You're making us look bad. If
19:27
nothing else, right. Walters, of
19:29
course, is still defiant, accusing
19:33
Republican lawmakers of teaming up
19:35
with Democrats. These
19:38
are folks that do whatever the
19:40
teachers unions tell them to. And
19:43
they want to bring back an era
19:45
of the teachers unions controlling our schools.
19:48
It sounds like better than you. Would
19:50
it? Yeah. What you want
19:52
as a superintendent of schools
19:54
is someone who hates teachers
19:57
unions, someone who
19:59
someone who. really doesn't want to deal
20:01
with all these pesky teachers. Right. Yeah.
20:04
I will never back down to moderate
20:06
Republicans partnering with Democrats to overturn the
20:08
will of the people. We're
20:10
not going to allow it. And
20:14
so yeah, he's
20:17
got the grand standing down, man. He
20:19
he I think this guy this this
20:21
guy's going places. Oh, oh, hopefully
20:24
jail. This is like he's going
20:27
places. This
20:29
is clearly that's all any of
20:31
this has been about. He's
20:33
just trying to make a name for himself.
20:36
Yeah. And he has. He
20:39
has. I mean, we're talking about
20:41
it. Yeah, we know we know
20:43
is and we're we don't
20:45
give a fuck about Oklahoma. I
20:48
mean, I have to give a slight fuck
20:50
about you give it like a family fuck
20:52
about it. Yeah. A
20:54
family fuck. I give a family fuck. Well,
20:57
OK, that's that may have come
20:59
out. That may not sound great,
21:01
but it does sound Oklahoma. Oh,
21:04
how dare you. That's
21:07
Arkansas. And
21:11
all of the Arkansans on our listening
21:13
right now are like, no, it's Mississippi.
21:17
It's always Mississippi. It's always
21:19
you always know it's Mississippi.
21:22
All right. Well, I'm I'm
21:25
going to speaking of geography.
21:28
I've got a geography based
21:31
story now. Which
21:35
is that Pew are friends over
21:37
at the the Pew Pew have
21:41
done a new a new survey trying
21:45
to sort of get at what
21:47
countries in the world are
21:50
the most religious countries.
21:53
Hmm. And it's
21:55
it's an interesting one. Not tremendous.
22:00
no shockers here. Like you
22:02
will not be surprised to
22:04
learn that
22:06
you know Indonesia wins. Oh.
22:10
Right. Because if it had been Norway. If it
22:13
had been Norway. That would have
22:15
been a headline. Yeah. Yeah.
22:17
Yeah. I mean the one interesting thing is
22:20
sort of like the methodology that
22:22
they use because Pew
22:24
has not done a great job with the
22:26
methodology and they even admit that in their
22:28
own article. They basically say
22:31
we don't love how we did it because
22:34
it doesn't take into account because they what
22:36
they basically did was they asked two questions.
22:39
How important is religion in your
22:41
life and how often do
22:43
you pray. And those
22:45
questions are really they get
22:48
it something for say members
22:50
of an Abrahamic religion. Like
22:52
Christianity or Islam. But like
22:56
prayer isn't always the thing right in
22:58
a religion. You know what I mean.
23:00
So it's like how
23:02
do you determine how religious. You
23:05
know if a Japanese person is
23:07
Buddhist and Shinto but doesn't really
23:09
do much like. More like
23:11
how often do you practice your faith. Yeah.
23:14
But I mean that what does that even
23:16
mean. Like so it's I admit it is
23:18
a tricky question to ask
23:21
or it's a tricky concept to sort
23:23
of get at. How
23:26
often do you pray when one
23:28
of the world's religions requires it
23:31
five times a day. Right. Exactly.
23:33
And you'll be you won't be
23:35
surprised to learn that yes the
23:37
Muslim countries pray more than other
23:40
countries. But also like the
23:43
most Muslimist of all of the countries
23:46
are also the countries where it's not
23:48
legal to leave the religion. So. Yeah.
23:52
So you know it if it's
23:54
not legal to leave your
23:56
religion if you're a Muslim.
24:00
Yeah, and I get that that's what
24:02
they're trying to get around, right? Is
24:05
sort of with those questions. By asking
24:07
like how important is it, yeah. Yeah,
24:09
like how important and how often do
24:11
you actually do things, right? Rather
24:14
than what is your religion, you know? But
24:17
I mean, if you live in a country where you could
24:19
be beheaded for your religion not being
24:21
important to you, I think
24:24
it makes sense that 95% of the people in Indonesia are
24:26
going to
24:28
say, yeah, it's important for
24:31
me to pray. Woo-hoo, go
24:33
Allah. Yeah, right. Okay. So,
24:36
but I mean, who knows? Many
24:38
of them are very sincere in
24:40
their beliefs and in their, you know, and
24:43
of course, so yes, the top
24:46
countries are all very
24:50
Muslim. So you've got Indonesia
24:52
and then a bunch of sub-Saharan Africa,
24:56
including Nigeria, Senegal, you've
24:58
got, you know, Iraq, you've
25:01
got Pakistan, and then it
25:03
gets into like, so
25:05
then it gets into like South
25:07
America and the highly Catholic
25:11
countries down there, Guatemala
25:16
and Honduras, etc. And
25:19
then, you know, when you get all the way to
25:22
the bottom of the list, you have,
25:24
and by the way, the US
25:26
is basically smack dab in the
25:28
middle on both
25:31
counts, sort of right in the
25:33
middle, right in the, at that sort of median
25:36
for percentage on
25:39
both of these questions, which I think
25:41
is interesting. You know, of
25:44
people who say that religion is
25:47
very important to them, you
25:50
know, United States is sandwiched between
25:52
Moldova and Chile, which
25:55
is interesting. But like, when
25:57
you go down the list, it's no surprise to
25:59
anybody that at the very very bottom. I
26:03
interestingly Japan is at the very
26:05
very bottom on that question. Okay,
26:07
but then it's just. Europe
26:10
might as well just write the word Europe. You
26:16
I would be interested of all of
26:18
the European countries. Mm-hmm that are in
26:20
the bottom of the of like
26:23
people who say that religion
26:25
is very important to them. Mm-hmm.
26:28
What what would you say are the give
26:31
me some of the the very very bottom ones the
26:33
the ones that For
26:36
whom is the least important least
26:38
important? I'm what are
26:40
we calling it now? Just check Check
26:43
Republic. Yeah, or Checha Checha.
26:45
That's the one I'm
26:48
gonna go I think they're really low
26:50
I think I've heard that before they
26:52
are very low. Yes, they are the
26:54
second lowest European country really After
26:57
are you ready? Okay, it's not
26:59
what you think Estonia oh
27:04
That doesn't surprise me there There
27:08
you're gonna say that doesn't count There's
27:11
even heard of Estonia No,
27:17
I that doesn't surprise me
27:19
yeah, and then you're not
27:21
gonna be surprised by any of the Denmark
27:23
Switzerland UK Sweden Sure lot
27:26
via Lot
27:28
via Finland Anyway,
27:31
and then Taiwan and Hong Kong that's interesting too
27:38
So there you go Only
27:41
you know in the US of Of
27:45
adults who say that religion is
27:47
very important in their lives. It's
27:50
only 42% Huh?
27:53
All right, so that's that
27:56
feels good. Yeah, okay with that
27:58
like yeah, do you? Do they have
28:00
any sense of like how these numbers
28:03
have trended? Like
28:05
do they give any context? Like are they able to
28:07
say like, you know, in 10 years ago in the
28:10
US, it was, you
28:12
know, yeah, I don't have that here. Hmm.
28:17
Uh, but we just say 48%, 48%. It
28:21
was 42 42. All right. So
28:24
I don't have, I don't have that at
28:27
my fingertips currently, but let's just
28:29
say, uh, we,
28:31
it, we're sure that it's going down. We
28:35
know that. So, all
28:38
right, Dan, well, the
28:41
democratic national convention
28:43
is coming up, right?
28:45
Yeah. It's soon to happen. Um,
28:49
the best of the, the Natcons.
28:51
Um, they,
28:55
um, so back when
28:57
Biden was slated
28:59
to be the loser this November, um,
29:03
they had released a
29:05
draft platform, um, which
29:08
there's been no public update of
29:10
this and sort of judging
29:12
by some of the things that are in
29:14
this article about it, I don't, I can't
29:16
really see huge changes, uh,
29:20
coming. Uh, but what's, what's great
29:22
about this article that I found on,
29:24
uh, life news.com. Oh,
29:28
sounds like a trustworthy place. Oh, well,
29:30
of course, because it's all news. Uh,
29:33
it's news for people who care about, uh,
29:37
uh, life, right? This is
29:39
a pro life. Yeah. I
29:41
was going to say that sound, that
29:43
sounds like meaning anti-abortion, anti-abortion, uh, website.
29:47
Um, but, but
29:49
you know what? The one thing I do trust folks
29:51
like this to do is to really go
29:54
through a document
29:56
like this and find, uh,
30:01
All the outrage material. All the stuff
30:03
for outrage, exactly. So
30:06
let's see, the draft,
30:09
again, this is just a draft,
30:11
not adopted yet, the platform vows
30:15
to nationalize abortion on demand
30:17
across all 50 states, support
30:22
taxpayer-funded abortion, protect
30:25
the predatory transgender industry. I'm
30:28
quoting here. You
30:31
better be. Yeah. If that
30:33
came out of you, we would have to
30:35
quit the show. And
30:38
continue, quote, fighting against
30:40
parents who seek to keep pornography
30:42
out of their children's school libraries.
30:45
Right, because that's what we're all about.
30:47
So much pornography in these school libraries.
30:49
Give those kids their porn, you animals.
30:53
No, the kids have it on their fucking phones
30:55
if they want it. Yeah,
30:58
I know. I was relegated to the
31:00
JC Penney catalog growing up. So
31:04
this is the kind of document, or
31:06
the kind of article that I'm reading
31:08
here, right? Yeah. Let's
31:11
see, they say the word abortion is
31:13
mentioned 13 times. The
31:17
concept of reproductive rights is mentioned
31:19
14 more times. Again,
31:21
I'm reading their phrasing here. Right. Because
31:24
they're horrified. They're positively beside
31:28
themselves. The term LGBTQI plus
31:30
is mentioned 35 times. Oh,
31:34
won't someone save us? Climate change,
31:36
or climate in the context of
31:38
climate change occurs over 70 times.
31:42
Oh my god, they're trying to
31:44
protect the climate. But, and this
31:46
is according to Brent Keelan,
31:49
Vice President for Strategic Initiatives
31:52
at the Family Research Council.
31:55
He says, but I could not find
31:57
one mention of the word God. in
32:00
the platform draft. Oh no. I
32:02
also couldn't find one mention of
32:05
the word Christian.
32:09
Oh no. Oh, the tragedy of
32:11
it all. It's
32:14
devastating. It's truly devastating. Let's
32:18
see, the draft does
32:20
mention the Respect for Marriage Act,
32:23
which is an important piece
32:25
of legislation. It's federal legislation.
32:27
This is to safeguard against
32:30
a dumb, dumb scotis that might
32:32
overturn gay marriage.
32:35
So this would require all states
32:38
to recognize a gay
32:40
marriage, a
32:42
marriage license issued in any other state,
32:46
which would effectively
32:48
make gay marriage
32:51
sort of recognized nationally. Right. Because you could
32:53
just go to a state. It puts
32:55
a little bit of a burden on a
32:58
gay couple in say
33:00
Alabama, right? To have to
33:02
travel to another state to
33:04
get married. But once they
33:06
do, Alabama or
33:08
Idaho would have to recognize
33:10
it. Well, you know, what it does is it
33:12
just says, I don't
33:15
think that it will, I think it has a much better
33:17
effect than that, which is that as
33:19
of right now, gay marriage
33:22
is legal in all of these
33:24
places. So it just means don't
33:28
stop doing that because
33:30
you're just going to have to recognize it anyway. Right.
33:33
I mean, yes, but like
33:35
they're going to not, you
33:37
know, go forward with, you
33:40
know, ending gay marriage in their state,
33:43
right? Like, of course, of course, Alabama
33:45
and possibly like, you just
33:48
because it's going to be, they're going to have to
33:50
recognize it doesn't mean that they're going to be like,
33:52
Oh yeah. You know, let's keep
33:55
issuing marriage licenses. They're not going to do
33:57
that. They're going to take their more. stand
33:59
and they're gonna say we're not gonna do
34:01
it even if we have to recognize that
34:03
we're not going to that's
34:06
possible I just think you know why
34:08
bother yeah at that point just just
34:10
because they want to take the stand
34:12
right they want to yeah maybe I
34:14
think I think everyone's getting tired I
34:16
think our country's getting tired of all
34:18
of this bullshit yeah and after this
34:21
if if we come through and
34:24
we elect that you
34:26
know Harris and we elect you
34:29
know down ballot Democrats
34:31
the way we need to yeah
34:34
I think the nightmare
34:36
will start to be over like
34:38
the spell will be will start to be
34:40
broken the fever will break right
34:42
this this this
34:44
fever dream that's a great way of thinking
34:46
about it yeah yeah the fever will
34:48
break and we'll we'll all be this
34:50
this night marriage fever dream that we've been
34:53
living through yeah for the last
34:57
last little while yeah you know I
34:59
mean I'm I think
35:01
that you the the spell that
35:04
Donald Trump casts
35:07
on the Republicans will be broken
35:09
I think there's a really
35:11
good chance of that yeah and I
35:13
think and like moderate like reasonable people
35:15
want to retake control of the Republican
35:17
Party they mean that I yeah good
35:19
party it's going to still be it's
35:21
gonna be a mess right yeah it's
35:24
gonna be a fucking mess but hopefully
35:26
it just sort of hamstrings them for
35:28
for for a while and well and
35:30
and we can isolate out these Christian
35:32
nationalists and all the ding-dong I mean
35:34
we saw it we'll still have to
35:36
deal with SCOTUS I don't know what
35:39
to do about that but anyway we'll
35:41
see so they continue
35:43
being outraged about these kind of
35:45
things and they the
35:47
section on freedom of religion is not
35:49
good enough for them at all because
35:53
it's really about taking
35:57
actions to combat anti-Semitism which which does
35:59
nothing for them because they're Christian and
36:02
in square, in
36:04
scare quotes, Islamophobia. Or
36:08
maybe this is like questioning like does
36:10
that even, and whatever this Islamophobia is.
36:13
So wait, is antisemitism also
36:15
in scare quotes? Nope, just.
36:18
Okay, just. Antisemitism is real,
36:20
Islamophobia, whatever that is.
36:23
I don't think, I ain't heard of that.
36:25
Like, yeah, that's the whole
36:28
like, no, no, no, it's not a phobia,
36:31
right? Well, which is funny because, you
36:33
know, I
36:36
can get people saying, but I'm not afraid of
36:38
gay people. You are, but like I can get
36:40
people saying that, but these people
36:42
are very afraid of Muslims. Well,
36:45
I'm kind of afraid of Muslims.
36:47
So, well, there you go. I
36:50
don't know if it
36:52
fully counts as Islamophobia. I'm
36:55
afraid of Islam. I'm
36:58
afraid of radical. I'm afraid, I think it's
37:00
a shit religion and
37:04
I'm a little bit afraid of it.
37:06
But Muslims, that's
37:08
a different thing. Right, sure.
37:10
The people, I'm not bigoted
37:13
toward Muslims. I just
37:16
really dislike their religion. And
37:19
then. I mean, I dislike all of
37:21
the religions, but yeah. I dislike that one the
37:23
most, clearly. Right.
37:27
And I feel like I'm allowed to do that. Well,
37:30
I'm not stopping. I'm allowed to say which
37:32
one I think is the worst. Anyway,
37:37
it was a fun read, actually.
37:40
Because boy, they
37:42
just think that we're the devil.
37:48
But anyway. And their
37:50
terror feeds me. I do
37:52
love, I do relish Christian
37:55
terror. About that
37:58
kind of nonsense. Oh no, they're gonna be.
38:00
nice to gay people. Someone
38:02
think of the children. One
38:05
last thing, this one's actually pretty good. There's
38:07
this section on freedom of religion,
38:09
right? And it says, so
38:11
this is quoting from the
38:14
document, right? Right. It says, which
38:17
says, Democrats will protect the First Amendment, right
38:20
to free exercise of religion for everyone, and
38:22
we will maintain the separation of church and
38:24
state. And then
38:26
it, but it's like, they have to find
38:29
something to be outraged about. And so it
38:31
says the reference to separation of church and
38:33
state is the only time the platform uses
38:35
the word church. Yeah,
38:38
correct. Good. Good. If this
38:41
is for real, good.
38:43
Yeah. Like finally. Right.
38:46
Of course. Normally.
38:48
Yeah. Take a stand. And also, um,
38:51
where's your parties platform? Oh,
38:54
ooh, ouch. Where's
38:56
that? Ouch. Is it project
38:58
2025? Cause, uh, yikes.
39:01
Yeah. All right. Um, I'm
39:03
going to close this out with a little bit
39:05
of, a little bit of weird, but good
39:08
news, I suppose, which is, uh, do
39:11
you know, I almost said
39:13
Gordon Ramsey, Dave Ramsey. Have you heard
39:15
of Dave Ramsey? Do you remember him?
39:18
Yeah. He has a bunch of really good restaurants, right?
39:21
That's the other one. Dave Ramsey, uh,
39:24
is a Christian,
39:27
very, very faith-based finance,
39:31
uh, guru. He teaches
39:34
people how to like invest
39:38
Christianly, I guess. I
39:40
don't know. It's a really dumb concept and I,
39:42
I wouldn't listen to him if I were you.
39:45
And here's a good reason. Uh, he
39:48
doesn't care about, you know, reality
39:50
to the point where back
39:53
when in 2020, when, uh,
39:55
there was this whole COVID-19
39:57
thing happening. He,
40:01
not only did he
40:03
like downplay the risks of
40:06
that horrible disease, but
40:09
he like would refer to mask
40:11
wearers as wusses and
40:15
told employees that they
40:17
couldn't work from home and that they would have
40:20
to, and that his
40:22
company was guided by faith,
40:25
not fear. Which
40:28
didn't sit great with some
40:30
of the employees, including one
40:32
Brad Amos, who was
40:35
a video editor for
40:38
the company and wanted
40:42
to, you know, wear a
40:44
mask to protect himself and
40:46
his coworkers, which
40:49
apparently got him fired.
40:51
Oh, what?
40:57
I mean, of course it did. Which is
40:59
amazing. Like the
41:01
thought that you, so I mean,
41:03
like I get firing someone for
41:05
not being willing to wear a
41:07
mask when there's a deadly
41:10
disease killing millions of people.
41:14
But I don't know about someone
41:17
electing to take
41:19
precautions. That's
41:21
a fire in a fence. That seems a
41:24
little bit bananas. But
41:27
when he decided to sue, originally
41:32
the judge dismissed because
41:35
here's the thing. It's not
41:37
easy to figure out what to sue for because
41:40
you got to pick
41:42
a thing. You
41:45
got to pick a law that was broken in
41:47
this thing. And
41:49
what they went with was religious
41:52
discrimination because
41:55
Ramsey had very clearly tied
41:58
his positions on COVID. 19
42:00
and the positions on COVID
42:02
19 to their
42:04
religion. And
42:07
the thing about it is that like that
42:09
really, you know, so
42:11
this guy basically said, this
42:15
is discrimination against people who don't
42:17
have their religion. They called
42:19
it, some people are calling
42:21
it reverse discrimination, meaning
42:23
you're not of the religion and
42:25
therefore you're being discriminated against rather
42:27
than being discriminated against for having
42:31
an opposing religious belief. Cause it's not like
42:33
it was a hit one of his religious beliefs
42:37
to wear a mask. Although that's
42:39
how they framed it. They like his lawyers
42:41
framed it as like, he
42:44
has a religious belief of the
42:46
golden rule. Basically
42:49
saying, you know, if do unto others as you
42:51
would have them would do unto you. And
42:54
that required him to wear a
42:56
mask and to social distance and
42:58
to comply with the fucking CDC
43:01
recommendations, et cetera. Anyway,
43:06
that was dismissed in US district court.
43:09
They appealed and
43:12
the sixth circuit, the
43:14
court of appeals overruled
43:17
that district court judge and
43:20
said, no, this actually does
43:23
because the, the, the district court
43:26
judge basically said that he had
43:28
failed to, to
43:30
demonstrate that there was any discrimination.
43:36
And the sixth circuit said, no,
43:39
this is discrimination based on religious
43:42
non conformity, meaning not, you're
43:44
not forming to our religious
43:46
things. Yeah. And therefore, try
43:48
again, you have to,
43:50
you have to try this case. Okay.
43:53
So there you go. Man,
43:55
these things take a long time. Court
43:59
system is. Suing is
44:01
the worst. Yeah. Lawsuits
44:03
are the worst. Anyway,
44:05
there you go. A little bit of
44:07
triumph, a little bit of sense in the world. Hopefully
44:11
that goes well for that guy. And
44:15
there you go. If you would like to tell us
44:17
all about your encounters with,
44:20
I don't know, Dave Ramsey or bad bosses
44:23
or whatever, or anything
44:25
that we've talked about, please feel free
44:27
to write into us, podcast at thankgodimatheist.com.
44:30
Or call and leave us a voicemail message.
44:32
The telephone number is 424-666-8442. Stick
44:38
around. There's more show coming up. Well,
44:41
Frank, we do the
44:43
show and then people
44:45
write into us about
44:48
stuff. That's
45:00
how it works. We invite them to.
45:02
We just invited them to. So
45:05
here are a few things. We got in
45:08
a little bit of hot water with some
45:10
of our listeners. You'll
45:12
recall that we, a couple
45:14
weeks ago, we talked
45:17
about a priest
45:20
who was on Grindr, who got in some trouble,
45:22
who got outed. And
45:24
you and I had perhaps
45:28
not enough sympathy for him. I
45:32
think we, I mean, the tack that we took
45:34
was that like, you don't out
45:36
people. But if someone's
45:38
a horrible hypocrite and it's hurting everybody,
45:41
it's hurting a bunch of people. Yeah.
45:44
Meaning a priest, you know, our
45:46
anyway, some people wrote in, wrote
45:48
into us. I think we're going to need to clarify
45:51
whether that is still our opinion or not. Anyway,
45:53
here's a few things that people had to
45:56
say. This is from Casey who said, OK,
45:58
guys, you're going to have to explain this.
46:00
to me further. I don't understand
46:02
how outing a married guy for being
46:04
on Grindr is any different than outing
46:06
a gay priest. Both have
46:09
taken vows and are committing acts
46:11
against those vows in secret. Same,
46:14
same. Casey goes
46:16
on to talk about how they have
46:18
a family member
46:20
whose husband was
46:25
having illicit gay affairs behind
46:28
his wife's back. Anyway,
46:32
it's quite long, but Casey
46:34
says, sorry, but you cannot pretend to
46:37
be married and then fuck around behind
46:39
your partner's back no matter what your
46:41
sexual preferences are. That is
46:44
just bad practices as a person, as
46:47
an atheist, just all around decent
46:49
human. Cheating is wrong, it
46:51
just is. And
46:54
being a responsible human is about being honest. Anyway,
46:57
I think that, I
46:59
think, and I'll be interested to hear what you have
47:01
to say, but I think that it's
47:04
not the same. That being a priest is not the
47:06
same as, yes, they made vows, but
47:10
those vows are wildly different vows.
47:12
One vow is like, well,
47:16
it's to God, technically, but
47:19
the thing that a priest takes on
47:21
is public, is a public trust and
47:23
is something that affects thousands
47:29
of people. And
47:33
that is very different. If
47:35
someone gets married, one
47:37
person has to trust that person. And
47:40
the rest of us, it's none of
47:42
our goddamn business. Well, and also, let's
47:45
say you're privy to
47:49
the fact that somebody's cheating on their spouse, and
47:53
you going and telling the
47:55
spouse that's being cheated on,
47:57
you're informing them that that
48:00
they're being cheated on, right? You're
48:02
not publicly outing the cheater,
48:05
right, for
48:07
being gay, if they are, right? Or
48:10
for whatever they're doing. And if you
48:12
do that, you're going
48:15
a step too far. Yeah, going and
48:17
publicly announcing this kind of stuff, posting
48:19
about it on Facebook or something like
48:22
that would be wrong, right? Right.
48:24
Because that person has not, I mean, if
48:28
that person were in a, it's
48:30
different if they're in a public position
48:32
where they were taking a stand against
48:35
gay people. Correct. And they're secretly
48:37
gay. Right. You know what
48:39
I mean? A politician or a priest
48:41
who is taking a very public stance
48:43
against, that hurts all
48:46
gay people. Yeah. And
48:48
then they're actually gay, that's a different
48:50
thing. I'm not sure that I feel
48:52
like I'm still very uncomfortable with the
48:54
idea of outing them. Oh,
48:57
I'm not. I think that they deserve to
48:59
be outed. Because that is the, so
49:06
when you go to the person and
49:08
say, who's being cheated
49:10
on, right? And you sit them
49:12
down and you're like, hey, this is what's going on.
49:15
This is what I've witnessed
49:17
or have heard or
49:19
whatever. It's the exact
49:22
same thing as telling the public
49:24
that this person has influence over,
49:27
right? Right. Yeah, I
49:29
mean, the public who trusts this
49:31
person deserves to
49:33
know the believers and
49:36
the non-believers, the gay people and the
49:38
straight people. They all deserve to know.
49:40
I mean, what's important here is who's
49:42
the interested party. Because who's been violated
49:44
in this, right? Whose
49:46
trust has been violated, right? Yeah.
49:49
And it goes for politicians and it goes
49:51
for, I think probably more
49:54
senior type religious folk.
49:57
I don't think maybe your parish priest deserves
49:59
it. the
50:01
horrible consequences that this guy deserves. And maybe
50:03
that's going a little bit back on kind
50:05
of the rationale that I was just laying
50:07
out, but a
50:10
parish priest can be a little bit of a victim
50:12
of a system. Yeah. Whereas
50:14
if you're the head of that system,
50:16
you deserve to be called out for
50:18
it. And a parish priest who's part
50:21
of the system, but doesn't rail against
50:23
gay people or whatever. Right.
50:27
I mean, there probably is a
50:29
proportionality question in all of this.
50:31
And so for me, I have
50:34
serious empathy for anybody
50:37
who is closeted
50:39
and who doesn't know
50:41
the way out. I
50:44
don't have a lot of empathy if you're
50:48
a leader in an organization.
50:51
But I still do have empathy for
50:53
that person. What they're going through
50:55
on a human level ain't
50:57
great. But there's
50:59
a certain amount of if you're going
51:02
to be a leader in the Catholic Church, which
51:04
this guy was that we were talking about, and
51:07
then you're going and hooking up
51:09
on Grindr for Christ's sake. This
51:11
isn't about some quiet
51:14
affair somewhere. He's hooking up on fucking
51:16
Grindr. Right. Right. I
51:19
don't know. Like, I mean,
51:21
if you want to hook up on Grindr, great. Go
51:23
do it. But know that there's
51:26
a chance you're going to get caught. I
51:28
don't have a lot of sympathy for this
51:30
particular guy. He was doing something on a
51:32
fairly public, like anybody can get on Grindr.
51:35
Right. Now, I doubt
51:37
he was posting his picture. Right. In
51:40
fact, I'd be shocked to find out that
51:42
he was posting a picture of his face.
51:44
Maybe he was posting other pictures. Yeah.
51:46
But people are pretty dumb. A
51:49
lot of people. Usually, the guys who are looking for a hookup are
51:53
it's not their face. Right. They're posting
51:55
a picture of their junk or just
51:58
leaving it blank or whatever. So anyway,
52:01
body parts, they think, are going
52:03
to be played to
52:05
the best advantage. So I mean, that's,
52:09
I hear the writer's
52:12
concern, but I do
52:14
think it's different. Yeah. And I, you know,
52:16
we had another, uh, another email
52:18
from Joe that was, uh, you
52:21
know, basically saying that the same
52:23
thing that, that he
52:25
was shocked, uh, taken aback, uh,
52:28
by our comments. Uh, and
52:30
so I, and I, you know, I
52:32
get it, but I think we've answered it. I think,
52:35
I think, I think the idea, I think
52:38
the salient point in what, in what
52:40
you said that hit home for me
52:42
is yeah, who are the interested parties?
52:44
Yeah. Because it's important that, that they
52:46
know that their trust has been breached.
52:49
Yeah. And with a priest, the
52:52
interested parties are the public. Yeah. And
52:54
the same with a, with a politician. Yeah.
52:57
And so I guess for the parish priest,
52:59
I would feel, I would feel worse
53:02
for him than I would for the,
53:04
this leader guy. I don't really feel bad for him.
53:07
Right. Um, I, I,
53:09
I, I feel
53:11
bad that he's in
53:13
a tough situation that
53:15
he's denied himself. Um,
53:18
the happiness that living,
53:20
uh, a life out of
53:22
the closet could be. Yeah.
53:25
Um, but he'd have to give
53:28
up, um, a
53:30
lot in order to do that. See,
53:32
he's in a tricky, he's in a
53:34
tricky, awful position. Right. But the fact
53:36
of the matter is, is leaders in
53:39
an organization like the Catholic church who
53:41
are out cavorting and
53:44
whatnot, I think they deserve it. There.
53:46
I've said it now five different times.
53:49
They deserve it. That's that, that, that's
53:51
our position and we're sticking with it.
53:53
Apparently. Uh, Alexandra wrote
53:55
in to say, Hey, Frank and Dan, or
53:57
well, Frank eel and Danlin is. is
54:00
what she wrote. Okay. The
54:02
Christians have already given us the perfect symbol.
54:04
This is in relation to our conversation
54:07
about an atheist symbol, which
54:09
by the way, I'm
54:11
gonna say, you and
54:13
I, after we recorded last
54:15
week, had a delightful
54:18
little back and forth. As
54:22
we were looking up the null set
54:24
thing, because I really liked these, not
54:26
the oval one, but the circle with
54:29
the slash through it, and
54:31
I was Googling it, and I was looking at all these
54:33
different things. I think I might make merch.
54:35
I think we really might make merch. There's
54:38
no announcement happening yet, but I'm in
54:40
the process of getting merch with the
54:42
null set. Because
54:45
one of the things that's great about
54:48
it is that that symbol is also
54:50
just a letter in several of the
54:52
Scandinavian languages. And when
54:54
we clicked on, I texted you and
54:56
said, you
54:59
have to click on the sound that
55:01
that makes, because it is
55:03
the sound of atheism, because
55:06
that letter is ee. Like
55:10
literally, on the Wikipedia page for that letter, it
55:16
just, you can click on the little thing, and
55:18
it has a guy that goes ee. Which
55:22
sounds like you just
55:24
heard something disgusting. It's like, well,
55:26
and then you and I were joking that it was
55:29
like, oh, the missionaries have come to the, you open
55:31
the door after you hear a knock, and it's them,
55:33
and you just go ee. You
55:39
find out that you're on a date with
55:41
someone who's super Jesus-y, and then you're just like ee.
55:44
Ee. Anyway,
55:49
this is what Alexandra has to say, which is
55:52
that the Christians have already given us the perfect
55:54
symbol we need to wear as
55:56
jewelry and tattoos. 666,
55:59
or if you prefer. one of the more subtle versions a
56:01
barcode or a QR code will do. I can't
56:05
quite remember off the top of my head
56:07
which crazy Christian end times movie it was
56:09
but I once saw one that had a
56:11
really cool stylized mark of the beast with
56:13
the three sixes arranged like a trefoil knot.
56:16
Uh, you know, I get that
56:18
but to me that's just an
56:20
anti Christian one. Yeah symbol rather
56:22
than a pro us one. And
56:25
frankly, I don't want to identify myself
56:29
in opposition to another group. Yeah, I
56:31
don't want to. Yeah, I find with
56:34
it like get a 666 tattoo if
56:36
you want to freak out
56:38
the Christians around you do it. Which is
56:40
a that's funny a worthwhile thing to do
56:42
with your time. Absolutely.
56:46
But but yeah, I think that we we
56:49
need something that is not
56:51
connected somehow to stuff that already
56:53
has meaning because it's already a
56:55
sort of a symbol for
56:58
something else. Right? Yeah, I mean,
57:00
I'm I look if you are
57:02
an anti Christian and anti Christ
57:05
if you will. Yeah, please feel
57:07
free to take on that symbol.
57:09
I think that that's that's fine.
57:12
But I don't think I don't think it
57:14
quite fulfills our brief. Which
57:18
is fine. Joe has
57:20
written in Joe in Alaska has written in
57:22
saying Frank and Dan listening to your latest
57:25
episode where you covered failed
57:27
Rapture prophecies reminded
57:29
me of a prank of
57:31
an army buddy and I pulled his
57:34
neighbor was all about crazy religious beliefs
57:37
and just knew that the rapture was coming
57:39
on a predicted date. The neighbor
57:42
was very judgmental surprise and would tell
57:44
my buddy that he would burn in
57:46
hell for divorcing his wife and not
57:48
being a member of their church. Oh,
57:50
wow. So on the day of the
57:52
expected Rapture, I went to my buddy's house, he and I
57:54
made a point of saying hello
57:56
to the neighbor that morning while standing in
57:58
the front yard. We stayed
58:01
there for a while and watched the neighbor go
58:03
into their house. My buddy and I ran into
58:05
his house, changed clothes, placed
58:07
our other set on the
58:09
front lawn, and used tang
58:11
powder. Do you remember tang?
58:13
Yeah, delicious. Orange tang powder
58:16
to draw our heads and arms where
58:18
our body parts would be. We
58:21
also sprinkled some powder on the clothes to make
58:23
it look like we turned to dust. Oh, wow.
58:25
We sat in his house looking out the window
58:27
and saw the neighbor gaze into the lawn at
58:30
our clothes. Crazy neighbor looked around
58:32
and then up at the sky.
58:35
They were quite irate when they saw us
58:37
very much alive. Then
58:41
they also completely stopped speaking to my
58:43
buddy after that. I bet they did.
58:45
Yeah, probably no great loss. Yeah,
58:48
that's a fun prank. Not great
58:50
for neighbor relations. I
58:53
hope he didn't have any fence disputes
58:55
after or anything like that where they
58:58
had to work
59:00
together on something. Indeed.
59:02
Well friends, if you are
59:05
enjoying the show, if you're a
59:07
fan of us doing this, because
59:09
this is the thing that we do, we
59:12
would greatly appreciate it if you would
59:15
either consider giving us your
59:17
money, which is a thing
59:19
that is the only way that, you know, we don't
59:21
do ads or anything. So this is the only way
59:23
that we get any money for doing this. And
59:26
you can do that by going to
59:29
thank God I'm atheist.com/donate and
59:31
that'll send you, you know, you got a
59:34
way to go to our our Patreon and
59:36
if you go to our Patreon and you become
59:38
a patron at the right level, you'd
59:41
not only get this show, but
59:43
you get the Frank and Dan diary.
59:45
Oh my God. Bonus content
59:47
every week. We do it for
59:50
you. It's so good. It's
59:53
we are delightful. Don't
59:55
you want more of this? It's only
59:58
not this. It's just us. Uh,
1:00:00
Todd talking about things that interest us
1:00:02
that aren't this show. Anywho,
1:00:05
uh, that's free. That that's, that's not
1:00:07
free. Well, I don't know. It's our
1:00:09
gift to you. Uh,
1:00:11
if you're a patron at a certain level,
1:00:14
so we would appreciate that. If you can't
1:00:16
afford to become a patron, that's okay
1:00:18
too. We definitely understand that that's, uh, but
1:00:21
find ways, you know, you can, you
1:00:23
can review us on, on
1:00:25
the iTunes or wherever you're listening, you
1:00:27
can tell friends about the show, uh,
1:00:31
helping us grow is, is a very
1:00:33
important thing too. So anything
1:00:35
you can do to help. We appreciate. Uh,
1:00:38
and I think we have one person
1:00:40
to appreciate the extra most. We do
1:00:42
indeed Dan our top donor, our
1:00:45
Lord and savior, Davis.
1:00:49
More show coming up. All
1:01:00
right, Frank, listen, Richard
1:01:03
Dawkins is done. Uh,
1:01:06
well, yeah, we knew that we fired
1:01:08
him a long time ago and he
1:01:11
did not get the memo. Uh,
1:01:14
yeah, for those of you who don't know, maybe
1:01:17
there are some people don't know who Richard Dawkins
1:01:19
is. He was a, he
1:01:21
was a hero of the atheist movement
1:01:23
for a while. God. He wrote, he
1:01:26
wrote, uh, uh, the,
1:01:28
the God delusion. Yeah.
1:01:30
That, that was him, right? Yeah.
1:01:32
Yeah. That sounds right. He's a,
1:01:35
he's an evolutionary biologist. So, uh,
1:01:37
but he's also like a
1:01:40
old dude. Um, and
1:01:42
the thing is that, uh,
1:01:47
he has stopped being good. Uh,
1:01:49
he doesn't produce anything like that
1:01:52
forwards the atheist thing anymore. What he
1:01:54
does now is be
1:01:56
mean to trans people on Twitter. It's
1:01:59
free. remarkable It's
1:02:01
all I ever hear about him now. Yeah
1:02:05
Yeah, I this is this
1:02:07
is a bad retirement Dawkins Stay
1:02:11
off my lawn is perfectly reasonable at
1:02:13
your age. Just yeah do that. Yeah,
1:02:16
and But
1:02:18
instead he has decided to chime in on all
1:02:20
sorts of things Including
1:02:22
a recent tweet where he said where
1:02:25
he commented on Uh No,
1:02:29
and this has been a whole thing. Yeah Olympic
1:02:33
Woman boxer Iman Khalif
1:02:37
mm-hmm an Algerian who
1:02:40
won the gold, right? She
1:02:44
has very masculine features it's true
1:02:47
but this woman was assigned
1:02:50
female at birth because
1:02:54
she had female parts
1:02:58
she was raised a Girl,
1:03:01
she grew up to be a woman. She
1:03:04
identifies as a woman. This is a cis
1:03:06
woman Yeah, now a
1:03:09
few years ago. She had an issue where she
1:03:11
where she was competing in
1:03:13
a net in an international thing
1:03:16
in Russia and the
1:03:19
Russian Organization
1:03:23
that that was sponsoring the event Accused
1:03:27
her suspiciously after she
1:03:29
had beaten their Russian
1:03:34
Entry into this tournament or whatever was
1:03:37
they they they came out and said that she
1:03:39
had tested xy chromosomes
1:03:41
and They they
1:03:44
disqualified her now
1:03:47
listen human beings
1:03:49
are complex creatures and biological
1:03:51
sex and gender are Really
1:03:55
complex issues and there's not just a
1:03:57
binary. We know this you
1:03:59
can be X Y and have
1:04:02
you know a vagina and breasts and
1:04:05
and you know be
1:04:07
a woman X Y
1:04:10
chromosomes do not determine your biological
1:04:12
sex there's a
1:04:14
lot of stuff that goes
1:04:16
on that determines biological sex
1:04:18
hmm anyway one
1:04:21
person who should definitely know
1:04:24
that biological sex is
1:04:27
has many many different things
1:04:29
that determine it is Richard
1:04:31
Dawkins evolutionary biologist who
1:04:34
ends up say who ended up
1:04:36
tweeting recently two men masquerading
1:04:38
as women are being allowed
1:04:41
to box against real women
1:04:43
in the Olympics these
1:04:47
are neither of the people that he is talking
1:04:49
about are men or have
1:04:52
ever been men or were assigned
1:04:54
male or female male
1:04:56
at birth or anything they're not
1:04:58
trans people right these
1:05:01
are women they literally
1:05:04
what drives me crazy about this and
1:05:06
of course you know JK Rowling
1:05:09
jumped on this thing and yeah
1:05:12
like the entire twitters twittersphere
1:05:15
the ex exoplanet
1:05:20
was was a all abuzz and
1:05:25
it's what's hilarious to me about this
1:05:28
is that this is going
1:05:30
literally against everything that
1:05:32
the anti-trans people have been saying this
1:05:34
whole time because what the
1:05:37
anti-trans people have been doing this whole
1:05:39
time is we know
1:05:41
what a woman is a woman is
1:05:43
a person who has a vagina when they're born
1:05:45
and who is raised a girl
1:05:47
and blah blah blah that's what a woman
1:05:49
is we know it and
1:05:53
now they
1:05:55
see a woman who is you know
1:05:58
whose face looks man masculine
1:06:01
whose body is very
1:06:03
powerful and They're
1:06:05
like Mmm, I
1:06:07
don't like it. I don't think it's a woman.
1:06:09
I just think
1:06:12
it's just literally
1:06:14
you're they You
1:06:17
know to some extent like You
1:06:19
know, these these are the same assholes
1:06:21
who made that that movie. What is
1:06:24
a woman? Matt
1:06:26
what's his name? Have
1:06:28
you heard of this? Hmm? Yeah, there
1:06:30
was a film called. What is a woman? Matt
1:06:33
Walsh made it this is a far
1:06:37
right nutball connected to
1:06:39
the Daily Wire Mm-hmm,
1:06:42
and it was just supposed to be this
1:06:44
gotcha question. What is a woman and And
1:06:48
all the liberals are having trouble Defining
1:06:51
it but we conservatives know exactly
1:06:53
what it is Well,
1:06:55
guess what? This woman
1:06:58
who was a this this boxer Meets
1:07:03
all of your definition. It's your
1:07:05
own definition and and
1:07:08
even that XY thing Is
1:07:10
spurious it came from
1:07:13
one source that source had a
1:07:15
vested interest in getting her disqualified Like
1:07:19
it's spurious and the Olympic and the
1:07:21
Olympic Committee doesn't fucking care about it,
1:07:24
right? So
1:07:26
anyway, I just think it's
1:07:29
so It's that whole
1:07:31
thing about like what's porn? Well, I I can't
1:07:33
define it, but I know it when I see
1:07:35
it. I Know
1:07:37
a woman when I see it. It's like It's
1:07:41
so it's like they refuse
1:07:43
I I
1:07:46
Here's what I think this proves. I Haven't
1:07:48
let you get a word in edgewise. Yeah, but here's
1:07:50
what I think you're doing fine. Here's
1:07:53
what I think this proves What
1:07:55
it proves is that they don't actually care about
1:07:59
genetics about chromosomes
1:08:02
about any what they care
1:08:04
about the science part of it. They don't care about
1:08:06
the science part of it at all The
1:08:10
nut they can scream and they
1:08:12
scream science words Mm-hmm
1:08:14
from like at the tops of their
1:08:16
lungs, but all they care about when
1:08:19
it comes right down to it is their
1:08:22
widow feelings That
1:08:24
this might that this gives them the
1:08:26
ick Mm-hmm, and
1:08:28
they can't handle it. They don't know what to do
1:08:30
with their feelings And so when
1:08:32
the science isn't on their side,
1:08:35
they don't care Right
1:08:37
the science that they've been spouting
1:08:39
suddenly doesn't matter anymore Because
1:08:42
all they care about is that
1:08:45
this has is that
1:08:47
they've decided that it's weird and they don't
1:08:49
want to deal with it well, right, I
1:08:51
mean because when
1:08:55
When somebody like this boxer comes
1:08:57
along She
1:09:01
transgresses their Against
1:09:03
their idea of what a woman is Right.
1:09:06
Yeah, and and that's that's all it
1:09:08
is and then they don't they have no
1:09:10
idea how to respond but
1:09:13
they they they have an idea in their head of
1:09:17
Woman and actually they mean
1:09:19
wife right teenage girl
1:09:22
or wife Yeah, they
1:09:24
mean baby factory and
1:09:26
sex object. Yeah, exactly and And
1:09:30
and that's that's what they want. And
1:09:32
so here's this here's this
1:09:34
woman who doesn't fit that
1:09:36
doesn't look like she fits
1:09:39
that right and That's
1:09:42
the problem they don't like it and and to
1:09:44
be honest, I think somebody like Richard Dawkins at
1:09:46
this point He's decided this is the hill he's
1:09:48
dying on and so he just keeps retweeting everything
1:09:51
Yeah, and he's like, well, this is me
1:09:53
now This is my
1:09:55
new thing. Unless do you think that it
1:09:57
was just that one thing he? He
1:10:00
went all in on it. He kept tweeting
1:10:02
things like, you know, a picture of a
1:10:04
motorcyclist in front of a bunch of like
1:10:07
bicyclists That says
1:10:10
biker who identifies as a cyclist
1:10:12
wins the Tour de France. Yeah,
1:10:14
you know Another
1:10:17
picture of a bunch of Men
1:10:21
in a foot race and it says first
1:10:23
biological cheetah who identifies as a man
1:10:26
set to take gold for the blah
1:10:28
blah blah blah Yeah, it's it's
1:10:31
such a bad argument and
1:10:33
a bad faith argument Yeah, and
1:10:36
the fact that he's willing to make it so
1:10:40
Deeply tarnishes his credentials I
1:10:42
know and his bona fides
1:10:45
as a serious person as a scientist
1:10:47
as everything that he had like built
1:10:50
His brand around right now that
1:10:53
like it's like well, I Don't
1:10:56
care how good his atheist books are at this
1:10:59
point. No, I want nothing to do with
1:11:01
them Right. I mean though they're from the
1:11:03
80s anyway, like he's Who
1:11:07
the fuck cares what he thought like he
1:11:09
was important for his time. Yeah, and I'm
1:11:11
actually really grateful for him. Mm-hmm For
1:11:15
that for being outspoken at that time.
1:11:17
Yeah, that was a really bold Powerful
1:11:20
thing that he did then and
1:11:23
now he's just shitting all over his
1:11:25
legacy. Yeah Which
1:11:27
okay by the by
1:11:29
I guess I you
1:11:32
know, we want to revere you Richard
1:11:35
But don't have heroes people. That's
1:11:37
I think that's the I
1:11:40
don't know that he was ever a hero of mine,
1:11:42
but He was somebody who?
1:11:45
There was a lot of people's here. Yeah. Yeah.
1:11:48
Yeah. Yeah, and and
1:11:50
I don't I'm very picky with my
1:11:52
heroes What you should
1:11:54
don't have I actually that's so
1:11:57
yeah, I probably yeah, it's
1:11:59
hard for me to even think of somebody that I would
1:12:01
consider a hero. Yeah, let's
1:12:04
just realize that people can do good things
1:12:06
and then also do awful things, the
1:12:09
same person. And
1:12:11
that's just how humans work. Yeah. Woohoo!
1:12:15
And then you have, yeah, all right.
1:12:17
Well, anyway, I don't care about
1:12:20
anyone's feelings about trans people. That's
1:12:24
none of anybody's business except to love them.
1:12:26
Just be nice to trans people. They're great.
1:12:29
That's your problem. So yeah, but
1:12:31
also just this whole thing about, he's
1:12:35
lying about these boxers. And
1:12:38
then his Facebook page,
1:12:41
he loses access or it gets
1:12:44
taken down momentarily. And
1:12:46
he freaks out and just starts
1:12:49
accusing Facebook of having censored
1:12:51
him. And
1:12:53
Facebook is like, no, no, no, no, no, no. Your
1:12:57
account was hacked. That's
1:12:59
what we do when your account
1:13:01
gets hacked. We shut down your account
1:13:03
because we noticed you were being hacked
1:13:05
and you're too dumb to change your
1:13:07
password. And
1:13:10
then, yeah, so there you go.
1:13:12
He's an old man, get
1:13:15
off of his lawn and
1:13:17
don't listen to him anymore.
1:13:20
That's the end. All right. Well,
1:13:23
thank you all so much for listening.
1:13:25
If you would like to write into
1:13:28
us and I don't know, defend Dawkins
1:13:30
or whatever you want to do, do
1:13:32
what you want, but write into us
1:13:34
podcast at thankgodimatheist.com. Or call and
1:13:37
leave us a voicemail message. We'd love to hear from
1:13:39
you. The telephone number is 424-666-8442. Yeah.
1:13:43
And thinking of thankgodimatheist.com, go
1:13:45
to that slash donate and
1:13:48
give us your money. This
1:13:51
episode was edited by Roger Goudy
1:13:54
and music was provided by the Red Rock Hot
1:13:56
Club and Gordon Johnston. Hey,
1:13:59
thanks all. for tuning in we sure
1:14:01
do appreciate you thanks so much bye
1:14:03
bye thank
1:14:21
automatthiist as a production of TGIA media
1:14:23
LLC copyright 2024 all rights reserved
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More