Dammit, Dawkins

Dammit, Dawkins

Released Tuesday, 20th August 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Dammit, Dawkins

Dammit, Dawkins

Dammit, Dawkins

Dammit, Dawkins

Tuesday, 20th August 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

Hey everybody!

0:19

Hi friends, well from beautiful Salt

0:22

Lake City, Utah. It's Thank

0:24

God I'm Atheist. A podcast exploring

0:26

religion, politics, and current events from

0:28

a couple atheists just trying to

0:30

live our lives in these United

0:32

States. I'm Frank Feldman. And

0:34

I'm Dan Beecher. And coming

0:36

up on the show today Dan.

0:40

Oh God. Lies,

0:42

lies, and the liar.

0:46

Okay, you know what? We're

0:49

gonna trigger warn everybody. And

0:52

I don't know what to trigger warn the most.

0:54

Is it just that we're gonna be talking about

0:56

Richard Dawkins? I'm triggered. Trigger

0:59

warning on that one. But even

1:01

more so that he had

1:03

things to say about trans people again. Yeah.

1:07

Not good. Not

1:09

great. Not. That's

1:11

at the end of the show. And we are going, and

1:14

don't worry trans friends, we're going to

1:16

be definitely not on

1:19

his side. Dear

1:21

God no. Spoiler alert. Dear God

1:24

no. Yeah.

1:27

Oh, all right Dan. Yeah.

1:30

I have a story coming to us from the Church

1:32

of England. Oh, I've heard of

1:34

that. Yeah, nice

1:37

outfit normally, right? They

1:39

got a king up at the top. Yeah,

1:42

they tend to be harmless.

1:44

Are they? No,

1:47

no, that's not right. They're still Christians. Yeah.

1:51

For Christ's sake. Yeah, they're Christians. What

1:53

are they? They're something. But

1:55

they kind of, they sort of seem

1:58

nicer maybe? Maybe it's just the end. accents

2:00

I don't know I'm not sure no

2:02

they are nicer definitely like you know

2:05

it's it's definitely like

2:07

if you're ordering Thai

2:09

food their spice level is zero

2:12

well yeah like

2:15

it's still it's still too much

2:17

flavor for some but like for

2:19

the most part it's still yeah

2:22

okay that's that that's nice so

2:24

Dan with all of

2:27

that sort of setting this this up I

2:29

guess it sort of makes sense that

2:32

when faced with a

2:36

priest more than

2:38

just a priest canon he's

2:41

a cannon cannon Andrew

2:43

Hindley right that's that's the

2:45

title yeah I think he's

2:48

he's like maybe a must

2:50

be a priest he's a priest he's a priest

2:54

musket yeah I

2:57

think there should be I think all of

2:59

their titles should be should be gun really

3:01

okay yeah but they under bus they are

3:03

not they're not so

3:07

when they had a touchy

3:09

feely priest by

3:12

the name of canon Andrew Hindley

3:16

who was definitely

3:19

a risk to children

3:21

and young people you know

3:23

like how do you handle this how does an

3:25

organization deal with this we know

3:27

how the Catholics have done it they just sort

3:29

of move people around right well

3:33

the the C of E

3:36

they they pay them a

3:40

six-figure settlement and pushed him out the

3:42

door oh

3:44

that poor guy the poor guy they he

3:46

had there were five

3:48

police investigations into this guy and

3:51

they couldn't get anything to stick

3:53

right there was the

3:55

time that in 1991 where there

4:00

was alleged sex with a 16

4:02

year old boy. I'm

4:04

sorry. 17 year old boy. That

4:07

makes it better. There we go. The

4:10

age of consent at the time was 21. So it

4:12

was definitely, it

4:15

was statutory. Then

4:17

in 2000, after the age of consent had

4:20

been dropped 16, he

4:23

decided to sleep with a

4:25

15 year old boy. Of course. It's

4:28

no fun if it's legal. That's

4:31

yeah, that's, that's the problem with lowering the

4:33

age of consent apparently for some people. Right.

4:37

Is they got, now they're just going to go,

4:39

go younger. Boy, maybe

4:41

we should trigger warned this one.

4:45

Look, our show should just come

4:47

with a blanket trigger warning. So

4:51

both investigations, both of those investigations were

4:53

dropped after the alleged

4:55

victims and

4:57

the cannon denied

4:59

the allegations. So, okay, whatever.

5:03

And then there were the, there was

5:05

the time in 2001 where

5:08

there was an allegation of sexual assault

5:10

of a teenage boy three years that

5:12

happened three years earlier. And

5:14

let's see, he was the cannon.

5:17

Hindley was accused of

5:19

giving the alleged victim alcohol and encouraging

5:21

him to watch

5:24

pornography and then like,

5:26

you know, touching and groping and

5:28

whatnot. And 2006 allegations

5:32

over remarks made to a 15 year old boy.

5:35

And then in 2018 allegations of sexual

5:37

assault at a party in the

5:40

cathedral garden. This man

5:42

was out of control. He

5:44

really was. He

5:47

was really, really truly out of

5:49

control. But the, so they're trying

5:51

desperately to get rid of

5:53

him. It

5:55

got so bad that the archbishop

5:57

of Canterbury, um, back

6:01

to plan to close this

6:03

guy's cathedral if

6:05

the priest returned to work. Why

6:08

can't they fire this guy? What's

6:10

going on? Well, wrongful termination, I

6:13

presume. Let's see. I

6:15

feel like if you've got that

6:17

many police investigations, I

6:20

feel like you've got grounds to terminate. I

6:23

know, I guess, but nothing. I guess you need

6:25

a conviction. I don't know, what do you? Right?

6:29

How bad does it have to be? But

6:32

the C of E, they

6:34

just kept trying. They tried multiple times

6:36

to pay him to leave, but

6:40

he just wouldn't. As recently as 2022, he

6:42

was offered 240,000 pounds. Good

6:47

move. But we do not know

6:50

how much he took this

6:52

time, how much they offered and he actually did

6:54

take because he

6:57

and the church both signed non-disclosure

6:59

agreements. What's it gonna take

7:01

for you to stop raping these kids? We'll

7:03

pay you. I don't know. Good

7:07

Lord. I'm just gonna stay. I'm

7:09

staying. We're paying the criminals

7:11

now. Yeah, yeah. Please leave the

7:13

church. We'll pay

7:16

you. So the Church of England

7:18

is saying that this payment was

7:21

in order to settle legal action that

7:23

was brought by the priest, but

7:26

yeah, it's in light of

7:29

the fact that

7:32

the church has tried several times to

7:35

pay him off. It's just like, it's

7:37

just wild. There

7:40

you go. Yeah, so apparently-

7:42

Apparently there's good money in

7:45

bad behavior. Yeah. And

7:49

thanks C of E, like that's fucked

7:52

up. Yeah, you've really

7:54

sent a strong message with that one, C

7:56

of E. Good job. Well, and because it-

7:58

What? It

8:00

feels like to me that

8:03

because churches and, you

8:05

know, in general are so

8:08

weird about their predatory priests

8:10

and clergy that they

8:13

probably missed multiple opportunities to

8:15

make some of these allegations

8:17

actually stick. Right. Because

8:22

they were probably had their

8:24

own internal problems with reporting,

8:26

right? Yeah. And people

8:28

feeling like, well, I don't want to rat

8:30

him out because, you know, he's the priest.

8:32

He's the priest. And, you know, like

8:37

if they were just good on the issue

8:39

to begin with, they could have saved themselves,

8:42

you know, three

8:44

or four hundred thousand pounds. Several hundred thousand

8:46

pounds. Yeah, exactly. So probably

8:48

half a million. Who knows? It's

8:51

yeah, it's absurd. I

8:53

mean, here's the one thing that I will say.

8:56

It is possible that

8:59

by doing this, they

9:02

actually in a very fucked up

9:04

way protected children. I

9:06

and going forward.

9:08

Going forward. Yes. And if

9:11

that is, yes, not the ones who

9:13

have already had the problem, but like

9:16

like they may have done a really

9:20

lousy action for

9:23

a good effect. And

9:25

that effect is like the protection of kids.

9:29

And so I'm not going to get all

9:31

the way down their throats about it because,

9:35

yeah, I mean, maybe they kind

9:37

of did the right thing sort

9:39

of in the end.

9:43

Yes. But I think it's it's

9:45

it's just testament to how poorly they've handled. They probably

9:47

handled it up to this point. Yeah, right. What

9:51

it means is that there's they have

9:53

they have no systems that

9:56

could have ended this the

9:58

second it like. It's

10:01

it even seemed like it might be a

10:03

problem. Yeah, they've got no system in place

10:05

for that whatsoever And one can

10:07

only hope that they're smart enough to now try

10:09

to put some of those in place if for

10:11

no other reason Just to save themselves some money

10:14

Yeah, so when the next that when the next time

10:17

And comes along yeah if

10:19

one you could hope that you could

10:21

go ahead and hope that I've I

10:24

am gonna hope it I'm hoping

10:27

and the history and I

10:30

have little hope I'm on

10:32

that front damn okay great Well,

10:35

I am going to fly us back

10:37

over the pond to Oklahoma here

10:40

in these United States That's

10:42

a culture shock Yeah,

10:45

yeah You listeners in the

10:47

UK come come to Oklahoma at some point see

10:49

what see what you think uh

10:54

Now this is this is a follow-up

10:56

so We had

10:58

reported we had talked about a months

11:01

ago a plan

11:03

that they had in Oklahoma to have

11:07

to fund through

11:09

public funds a Charter

11:13

school that was that

11:15

was an online Catholic

11:18

charter school. Yeah And

11:22

and that was dumb and bad

11:24

and very clearly against

11:27

our like countries

11:30

Constitution and But

11:33

it turns out it was also against the

11:35

Oklahoma State Constitution and

11:38

the Oklahoma Supreme Court Ruled

11:40

seven to one to block The

11:44

state from from opening this school

11:47

So set it was set to happen like

11:50

this week or this like this

11:52

year and the

11:57

the Charter

11:59

school board There's apparently a

12:01

charter school board. Took until now

12:04

to vote, to

12:08

actually obey that ruling by the

12:11

Supreme Court and officially nullify their contract

12:13

to open this school. So

12:21

they came down

12:23

to the wire and apparently, the attorney

12:26

general of the state, who

12:28

seemed like he actually cares about the law, unlike

12:32

the attorney general to the state, just

12:34

to the south, because the Texas attorney general is

12:36

just the

12:39

most corrupt human on the earth. But

12:43

apparently, Oklahoma attorney general, Gentner

12:46

Drummond, actually thinks that, church

12:51

state separation is real, and he's not really a

12:53

real person. And

12:56

should probably happen, et cetera.

12:58

And so he threatened to, he

13:03

basically threatened individual board members,

13:06

if they voted to

13:09

go against the Supreme Court. He

13:12

basically threatened with citations that

13:14

could have been like six months in

13:16

jail and a $500 fine. Oh,

13:19

shut up, really? So

13:21

they fell in line. Magically,

13:24

there was a unanimous vote to

13:27

actually obey the law on this one. But

13:32

of course, they've decided to appeal their

13:34

decision. They

13:37

haven't, they've promised they will appeal. They

13:39

haven't filed an appeal to

13:41

the Supreme Court of the United

13:43

States, rather than just that, their

13:46

dinky home state Supreme Court. That's not

13:48

enough for them. And

13:50

who knows? I mean, they're probably

13:52

right. The Supreme Court of

13:54

the US will say, do

13:56

what you want, you know, because we got

13:58

idiots. it's in our current

14:01

Supreme Court. It's just, they're sort of just

14:04

Supreme Court and for Jesus up there, so

14:06

who knows? You say

14:08

they're idiots, I think they know what they're doing. They

14:12

know what they're doing. Okay, fine. Retract

14:14

idiots and replace it with bad

14:17

jurists. There you go. Ding, ding, ding,

14:19

ding, ding. People who do not care

14:22

about the law, only about Jesus. Ding,

14:24

ding, ding, ding, ding. And sort of

14:26

like being in the can for a

14:30

sort of right-wing Christian

14:32

nationalism. Ding, ding, ding,

14:34

ding, ding. Yeah, totally. There you go.

14:36

All right. Well, Dan, actually,

14:39

my story, my next story, is

14:43

related to the story that

14:45

you just told. This

14:48

is serendipitous.

14:54

This is actually pretty great. So did

14:57

you actually say the name Ryan Walters,

14:59

State Superintendent Ryan Walters? I

15:01

didn't. I do have a quote from him. He

15:03

did have a tweet related to him. I didn't

15:05

really hear. Shall I read it? Yeah, yeah, yeah,

15:07

yeah. Just a little. So here's what he had

15:10

to say about my thing and then you can

15:12

move on to whatever you're thinking about. This is

15:14

his big pet project, this guy, right? He loves

15:16

this thing. Oh, Jesusifying the

15:18

schools is the only thing he cares about.

15:20

So here's what he had to say. He

15:22

tweeted, the Oklahoma Supreme

15:25

Court has failed Oklahomans in

15:27

their latest dismal ruling against

15:29

parents and kids. They

15:32

have chosen the path of

15:34

liberal extremism and, hold

15:37

on, Marxism. By

15:41

depriving parents of a choice, it's

15:44

shameful but predictable from a

15:46

failed judicial system. Well, we

15:48

agree on that. The

15:51

judicial system is largely in

15:53

the shit can but there you go. They

15:56

do not represent conservative Oklahoma values.

16:00

Which is what he's pissed off about. So,

16:02

yeah, so he's been all about this like

16:06

online Catholic school and it getting, you know,

16:08

state funds and all that. He

16:12

also was responsible for his

16:16

order. I guess he's not, of course he's responsible

16:18

for it. It was his order that

16:22

the Bible be placed in every

16:25

classroom in the state of Oklahoma. Right. And

16:27

that teachers had to like... Not that he

16:30

had the authority to do that. And that

16:32

they... Boy, did he order it. And that

16:34

they had to incorporate Biblical teachings into the

16:38

curriculum, right? So

16:42

that's state superintendent Ryan Walters.

16:46

Well, it

16:49

turns out that

16:52

some... The Oklahoma state

16:54

legislature may not be too stoked

16:56

about this guy. Now,

17:00

of course, he would expect that from the Democrats. But

17:04

21 Republican

17:06

lawmakers have

17:08

signed on to a

17:11

letter requesting an investigation

17:14

into state superintendent Ryan Walters, which

17:17

could potentially lead to impeachment.

17:22

Now, this is a procedural thing that's

17:25

happening right now. House

17:28

Speaker Charles McColl said

17:32

that if the

17:34

legislators could get at

17:37

least 51 Republicans to

17:39

sign the letter, that

17:43

he would consider the request. And

17:47

so I'm not quite sure

17:49

legally what the whole process

17:52

would be, but according to

17:54

Melody Huckabee Rowlett, who

17:57

is a political science professor, professor

18:00

at the University of Oklahoma. Let's

18:04

see, according to her.

18:11

For this kind of thing in Oklahoma,

18:13

you don't really need to prove that

18:15

a crime was committed, apparently, if

18:19

they were to impeach him, right?

18:21

Or to have and they doesn't

18:23

have to be a crime for

18:26

the Senate to remove Walters from office.

18:29

And this is her quote, what rises

18:31

to level of impeachment is a little

18:33

different. It's broader alleged

18:36

incompetence, alleged

18:39

willful neglect of duties. It doesn't

18:41

have to be high crimes, misdemeanors.

18:45

So there

18:47

is a chance that Mr.

18:53

Walters could find himself

18:55

being kicked out of office. Now, of course,

18:59

the Republicans, they're shy of there's

19:02

still 30 legislators shy

19:04

of, you

19:07

know, taking it to the next step

19:09

of the request being considered.

19:13

But it would be

19:15

it would definitely it's already signaling to

19:18

Ding Dong McGee. Shut

19:21

the fuck up. Shut up.

19:23

You're making us look bad. If

19:27

nothing else, right. Walters, of

19:29

course, is still defiant, accusing

19:33

Republican lawmakers of teaming up

19:35

with Democrats. These

19:38

are folks that do whatever the

19:40

teachers unions tell them to. And

19:43

they want to bring back an era

19:45

of the teachers unions controlling our schools.

19:48

It sounds like better than you. Would

19:50

it? Yeah. What you want

19:52

as a superintendent of schools

19:54

is someone who hates teachers

19:57

unions, someone who

19:59

someone who. really doesn't want to deal

20:01

with all these pesky teachers. Right. Yeah.

20:04

I will never back down to moderate

20:06

Republicans partnering with Democrats to overturn the

20:08

will of the people. We're

20:10

not going to allow it. And

20:14

so yeah, he's

20:17

got the grand standing down, man. He

20:19

he I think this guy this this

20:21

guy's going places. Oh, oh, hopefully

20:24

jail. This is like he's going

20:27

places. This

20:29

is clearly that's all any of

20:31

this has been about. He's

20:33

just trying to make a name for himself.

20:36

Yeah. And he has. He

20:39

has. I mean, we're talking about

20:41

it. Yeah, we know we know

20:43

is and we're we don't

20:45

give a fuck about Oklahoma. I

20:48

mean, I have to give a slight fuck

20:50

about you give it like a family fuck

20:52

about it. Yeah. A

20:54

family fuck. I give a family fuck. Well,

20:57

OK, that's that may have come

20:59

out. That may not sound great,

21:01

but it does sound Oklahoma. Oh,

21:04

how dare you. That's

21:07

Arkansas. And

21:11

all of the Arkansans on our listening

21:13

right now are like, no, it's Mississippi.

21:17

It's always Mississippi. It's always

21:19

you always know it's Mississippi.

21:22

All right. Well, I'm I'm

21:25

going to speaking of geography.

21:28

I've got a geography based

21:31

story now. Which

21:35

is that Pew are friends over

21:37

at the the Pew Pew have

21:41

done a new a new survey trying

21:45

to sort of get at what

21:47

countries in the world are

21:50

the most religious countries.

21:53

Hmm. And it's

21:55

it's an interesting one. Not tremendous.

22:00

no shockers here. Like you

22:02

will not be surprised to

22:04

learn that

22:06

you know Indonesia wins. Oh.

22:10

Right. Because if it had been Norway. If it

22:13

had been Norway. That would have

22:15

been a headline. Yeah. Yeah.

22:17

Yeah. I mean the one interesting thing is

22:20

sort of like the methodology that

22:22

they use because Pew

22:24

has not done a great job with the

22:26

methodology and they even admit that in their

22:28

own article. They basically say

22:31

we don't love how we did it because

22:34

it doesn't take into account because they what

22:36

they basically did was they asked two questions.

22:39

How important is religion in your

22:41

life and how often do

22:43

you pray. And those

22:45

questions are really they get

22:48

it something for say members

22:50

of an Abrahamic religion. Like

22:52

Christianity or Islam. But like

22:56

prayer isn't always the thing right in

22:58

a religion. You know what I mean.

23:00

So it's like how

23:02

do you determine how religious. You

23:05

know if a Japanese person is

23:07

Buddhist and Shinto but doesn't really

23:09

do much like. More like

23:11

how often do you practice your faith. Yeah.

23:14

But I mean that what does that even

23:16

mean. Like so it's I admit it is

23:18

a tricky question to ask

23:21

or it's a tricky concept to sort

23:23

of get at. How

23:26

often do you pray when one

23:28

of the world's religions requires it

23:31

five times a day. Right. Exactly.

23:33

And you'll be you won't be

23:35

surprised to learn that yes the

23:37

Muslim countries pray more than other

23:40

countries. But also like the

23:43

most Muslimist of all of the countries

23:46

are also the countries where it's not

23:48

legal to leave the religion. So. Yeah.

23:52

So you know it if it's

23:54

not legal to leave your

23:56

religion if you're a Muslim.

24:00

Yeah, and I get that that's what

24:02

they're trying to get around, right? Is

24:05

sort of with those questions. By asking

24:07

like how important is it, yeah. Yeah,

24:09

like how important and how often do

24:11

you actually do things, right? Rather

24:14

than what is your religion, you know? But

24:17

I mean, if you live in a country where you could

24:19

be beheaded for your religion not being

24:21

important to you, I think

24:24

it makes sense that 95% of the people in Indonesia are

24:26

going to

24:28

say, yeah, it's important for

24:31

me to pray. Woo-hoo, go

24:33

Allah. Yeah, right. Okay. So,

24:36

but I mean, who knows? Many

24:38

of them are very sincere in

24:40

their beliefs and in their, you know, and

24:43

of course, so yes, the top

24:46

countries are all very

24:50

Muslim. So you've got Indonesia

24:52

and then a bunch of sub-Saharan Africa,

24:56

including Nigeria, Senegal, you've

24:58

got, you know, Iraq, you've

25:01

got Pakistan, and then it

25:03

gets into like, so

25:05

then it gets into like South

25:07

America and the highly Catholic

25:11

countries down there, Guatemala

25:16

and Honduras, etc. And

25:19

then, you know, when you get all the way to

25:22

the bottom of the list, you have,

25:24

and by the way, the US

25:26

is basically smack dab in the

25:28

middle on both

25:31

counts, sort of right in the

25:33

middle, right in the, at that sort of median

25:36

for percentage on

25:39

both of these questions, which I think

25:41

is interesting. You know, of

25:44

people who say that religion is

25:47

very important to them, you

25:50

know, United States is sandwiched between

25:52

Moldova and Chile, which

25:55

is interesting. But like, when

25:57

you go down the list, it's no surprise to

25:59

anybody that at the very very bottom. I

26:03

interestingly Japan is at the very

26:05

very bottom on that question. Okay,

26:07

but then it's just. Europe

26:10

might as well just write the word Europe. You

26:16

I would be interested of all of

26:18

the European countries. Mm-hmm that are in

26:20

the bottom of the of like

26:23

people who say that religion

26:25

is very important to them. Mm-hmm.

26:28

What what would you say are the give

26:31

me some of the the very very bottom ones the

26:33

the ones that For

26:36

whom is the least important least

26:38

important? I'm what are

26:40

we calling it now? Just check Check

26:43

Republic. Yeah, or Checha Checha.

26:45

That's the one I'm

26:48

gonna go I think they're really low

26:50

I think I've heard that before they

26:52

are very low. Yes, they are the

26:54

second lowest European country really After

26:57

are you ready? Okay, it's not

26:59

what you think Estonia oh

27:04

That doesn't surprise me there There

27:08

you're gonna say that doesn't count There's

27:11

even heard of Estonia No,

27:17

I that doesn't surprise me

27:19

yeah, and then you're not

27:21

gonna be surprised by any of the Denmark

27:23

Switzerland UK Sweden Sure lot

27:26

via Lot

27:28

via Finland Anyway,

27:31

and then Taiwan and Hong Kong that's interesting too

27:38

So there you go Only

27:41

you know in the US of Of

27:45

adults who say that religion is

27:47

very important in their lives. It's

27:50

only 42% Huh?

27:53

All right, so that's that

27:56

feels good. Yeah, okay with that

27:58

like yeah, do you? Do they have

28:00

any sense of like how these numbers

28:03

have trended? Like

28:05

do they give any context? Like are they able to

28:07

say like, you know, in 10 years ago in the

28:10

US, it was, you

28:12

know, yeah, I don't have that here. Hmm.

28:17

Uh, but we just say 48%, 48%. It

28:21

was 42 42. All right. So

28:24

I don't have, I don't have that at

28:27

my fingertips currently, but let's just

28:29

say, uh, we,

28:31

it, we're sure that it's going down. We

28:35

know that. So, all

28:38

right, Dan, well, the

28:41

democratic national convention

28:43

is coming up, right?

28:45

Yeah. It's soon to happen. Um,

28:49

the best of the, the Natcons.

28:51

Um, they,

28:55

um, so back when

28:57

Biden was slated

28:59

to be the loser this November, um,

29:03

they had released a

29:05

draft platform, um, which

29:08

there's been no public update of

29:10

this and sort of judging

29:12

by some of the things that are in

29:14

this article about it, I don't, I can't

29:16

really see huge changes, uh,

29:20

coming. Uh, but what's, what's great

29:22

about this article that I found on,

29:24

uh, life news.com. Oh,

29:28

sounds like a trustworthy place. Oh, well,

29:30

of course, because it's all news. Uh,

29:33

it's news for people who care about, uh,

29:37

uh, life, right? This is

29:39

a pro life. Yeah. I

29:41

was going to say that sound, that

29:43

sounds like meaning anti-abortion, anti-abortion, uh, website.

29:47

Um, but, but

29:49

you know what? The one thing I do trust folks

29:51

like this to do is to really go

29:54

through a document

29:56

like this and find, uh,

30:01

All the outrage material. All the stuff

30:03

for outrage, exactly. So

30:06

let's see, the draft,

30:09

again, this is just a draft,

30:11

not adopted yet, the platform vows

30:15

to nationalize abortion on demand

30:17

across all 50 states, support

30:22

taxpayer-funded abortion, protect

30:25

the predatory transgender industry. I'm

30:28

quoting here. You

30:31

better be. Yeah. If that

30:33

came out of you, we would have to

30:35

quit the show. And

30:38

continue, quote, fighting against

30:40

parents who seek to keep pornography

30:42

out of their children's school libraries.

30:45

Right, because that's what we're all about.

30:47

So much pornography in these school libraries.

30:49

Give those kids their porn, you animals.

30:53

No, the kids have it on their fucking phones

30:55

if they want it. Yeah,

30:58

I know. I was relegated to the

31:00

JC Penney catalog growing up. So

31:04

this is the kind of document, or

31:06

the kind of article that I'm reading

31:08

here, right? Yeah. Let's

31:11

see, they say the word abortion is

31:13

mentioned 13 times. The

31:17

concept of reproductive rights is mentioned

31:19

14 more times. Again,

31:21

I'm reading their phrasing here. Right. Because

31:24

they're horrified. They're positively beside

31:28

themselves. The term LGBTQI plus

31:30

is mentioned 35 times. Oh,

31:34

won't someone save us? Climate change,

31:36

or climate in the context of

31:38

climate change occurs over 70 times.

31:42

Oh my god, they're trying to

31:44

protect the climate. But, and this

31:46

is according to Brent Keelan,

31:49

Vice President for Strategic Initiatives

31:52

at the Family Research Council.

31:55

He says, but I could not find

31:57

one mention of the word God. in

32:00

the platform draft. Oh no. I

32:02

also couldn't find one mention of

32:05

the word Christian.

32:09

Oh no. Oh, the tragedy of

32:11

it all. It's

32:14

devastating. It's truly devastating. Let's

32:18

see, the draft does

32:20

mention the Respect for Marriage Act,

32:23

which is an important piece

32:25

of legislation. It's federal legislation.

32:27

This is to safeguard against

32:30

a dumb, dumb scotis that might

32:32

overturn gay marriage.

32:35

So this would require all states

32:38

to recognize a gay

32:40

marriage, a

32:42

marriage license issued in any other state,

32:46

which would effectively

32:48

make gay marriage

32:51

sort of recognized nationally. Right. Because you could

32:53

just go to a state. It puts

32:55

a little bit of a burden on a

32:58

gay couple in say

33:00

Alabama, right? To have to

33:02

travel to another state to

33:04

get married. But once they

33:06

do, Alabama or

33:08

Idaho would have to recognize

33:10

it. Well, you know, what it does is it

33:12

just says, I don't

33:15

think that it will, I think it has a much better

33:17

effect than that, which is that as

33:19

of right now, gay marriage

33:22

is legal in all of these

33:24

places. So it just means don't

33:28

stop doing that because

33:30

you're just going to have to recognize it anyway. Right.

33:33

I mean, yes, but like

33:35

they're going to not, you

33:37

know, go forward with, you

33:40

know, ending gay marriage in their state,

33:43

right? Like, of course, of course, Alabama

33:45

and possibly like, you just

33:48

because it's going to be, they're going to have to

33:50

recognize it doesn't mean that they're going to be like,

33:52

Oh yeah. You know, let's keep

33:55

issuing marriage licenses. They're not going to do

33:57

that. They're going to take their more. stand

33:59

and they're gonna say we're not gonna do

34:01

it even if we have to recognize that

34:03

we're not going to that's

34:06

possible I just think you know why

34:08

bother yeah at that point just just

34:10

because they want to take the stand

34:12

right they want to yeah maybe I

34:14

think I think everyone's getting tired I

34:16

think our country's getting tired of all

34:18

of this bullshit yeah and after this

34:21

if if we come through and

34:24

we elect that you

34:26

know Harris and we elect you

34:29

know down ballot Democrats

34:31

the way we need to yeah

34:34

I think the nightmare

34:36

will start to be over like

34:38

the spell will be will start to be

34:40

broken the fever will break right

34:42

this this this

34:44

fever dream that's a great way of thinking

34:46

about it yeah yeah the fever will

34:48

break and we'll we'll all be this

34:50

this night marriage fever dream that we've been

34:53

living through yeah for the last

34:57

last little while yeah you know I

34:59

mean I'm I think

35:01

that you the the spell that

35:04

Donald Trump casts

35:07

on the Republicans will be broken

35:09

I think there's a really

35:11

good chance of that yeah and I

35:13

think and like moderate like reasonable people

35:15

want to retake control of the Republican

35:17

Party they mean that I yeah good

35:19

party it's going to still be it's

35:21

gonna be a mess right yeah it's

35:24

gonna be a fucking mess but hopefully

35:26

it just sort of hamstrings them for

35:28

for for a while and well and

35:30

and we can isolate out these Christian

35:32

nationalists and all the ding-dong I mean

35:34

we saw it we'll still have to

35:36

deal with SCOTUS I don't know what

35:39

to do about that but anyway we'll

35:41

see so they continue

35:43

being outraged about these kind of

35:45

things and they the

35:47

section on freedom of religion is not

35:49

good enough for them at all because

35:53

it's really about taking

35:57

actions to combat anti-Semitism which which does

35:59

nothing for them because they're Christian and

36:02

in square, in

36:04

scare quotes, Islamophobia. Or

36:08

maybe this is like questioning like does

36:10

that even, and whatever this Islamophobia is.

36:13

So wait, is antisemitism also

36:15

in scare quotes? Nope, just.

36:18

Okay, just. Antisemitism is real,

36:20

Islamophobia, whatever that is.

36:23

I don't think, I ain't heard of that.

36:25

Like, yeah, that's the whole

36:28

like, no, no, no, it's not a phobia,

36:31

right? Well, which is funny because, you

36:33

know, I

36:36

can get people saying, but I'm not afraid of

36:38

gay people. You are, but like I can get

36:40

people saying that, but these people

36:42

are very afraid of Muslims. Well,

36:45

I'm kind of afraid of Muslims.

36:47

So, well, there you go. I

36:50

don't know if it

36:52

fully counts as Islamophobia. I'm

36:55

afraid of Islam. I'm

36:58

afraid of radical. I'm afraid, I think it's

37:00

a shit religion and

37:04

I'm a little bit afraid of it.

37:06

But Muslims, that's

37:08

a different thing. Right, sure.

37:10

The people, I'm not bigoted

37:13

toward Muslims. I just

37:16

really dislike their religion. And

37:19

then. I mean, I dislike all of

37:21

the religions, but yeah. I dislike that one the

37:23

most, clearly. Right.

37:27

And I feel like I'm allowed to do that. Well,

37:30

I'm not stopping. I'm allowed to say which

37:32

one I think is the worst. Anyway,

37:37

it was a fun read, actually.

37:40

Because boy, they

37:42

just think that we're the devil.

37:48

But anyway. And their

37:50

terror feeds me. I do

37:52

love, I do relish Christian

37:55

terror. About that

37:58

kind of nonsense. Oh no, they're gonna be.

38:00

nice to gay people. Someone

38:02

think of the children. One

38:05

last thing, this one's actually pretty good. There's

38:07

this section on freedom of religion,

38:09

right? And it says, so

38:11

this is quoting from the

38:14

document, right? Right. It says, which

38:17

says, Democrats will protect the First Amendment, right

38:20

to free exercise of religion for everyone, and

38:22

we will maintain the separation of church and

38:24

state. And then

38:26

it, but it's like, they have to find

38:29

something to be outraged about. And so it

38:31

says the reference to separation of church and

38:33

state is the only time the platform uses

38:35

the word church. Yeah,

38:38

correct. Good. Good. If this

38:41

is for real, good.

38:43

Yeah. Like finally. Right.

38:46

Of course. Normally.

38:48

Yeah. Take a stand. And also, um,

38:51

where's your parties platform? Oh,

38:54

ooh, ouch. Where's

38:56

that? Ouch. Is it project

38:58

2025? Cause, uh, yikes.

39:01

Yeah. All right. Um, I'm

39:03

going to close this out with a little bit

39:05

of, a little bit of weird, but good

39:08

news, I suppose, which is, uh, do

39:11

you know, I almost said

39:13

Gordon Ramsey, Dave Ramsey. Have you heard

39:15

of Dave Ramsey? Do you remember him?

39:18

Yeah. He has a bunch of really good restaurants, right?

39:21

That's the other one. Dave Ramsey, uh,

39:24

is a Christian,

39:27

very, very faith-based finance,

39:31

uh, guru. He teaches

39:34

people how to like invest

39:38

Christianly, I guess. I

39:40

don't know. It's a really dumb concept and I,

39:42

I wouldn't listen to him if I were you.

39:45

And here's a good reason. Uh, he

39:48

doesn't care about, you know, reality

39:50

to the point where back

39:53

when in 2020, when, uh,

39:55

there was this whole COVID-19

39:57

thing happening. He,

40:01

not only did he

40:03

like downplay the risks of

40:06

that horrible disease, but

40:09

he like would refer to mask

40:11

wearers as wusses and

40:15

told employees that they

40:17

couldn't work from home and that they would have

40:20

to, and that his

40:22

company was guided by faith,

40:25

not fear. Which

40:28

didn't sit great with some

40:30

of the employees, including one

40:32

Brad Amos, who was

40:35

a video editor for

40:38

the company and wanted

40:42

to, you know, wear a

40:44

mask to protect himself and

40:46

his coworkers, which

40:49

apparently got him fired.

40:51

Oh, what?

40:57

I mean, of course it did. Which is

40:59

amazing. Like the

41:01

thought that you, so I mean,

41:03

like I get firing someone for

41:05

not being willing to wear a

41:07

mask when there's a deadly

41:10

disease killing millions of people.

41:14

But I don't know about someone

41:17

electing to take

41:19

precautions. That's

41:21

a fire in a fence. That seems a

41:24

little bit bananas. But

41:27

when he decided to sue, originally

41:32

the judge dismissed because

41:35

here's the thing. It's not

41:37

easy to figure out what to sue for because

41:40

you got to pick

41:42

a thing. You

41:45

got to pick a law that was broken in

41:47

this thing. And

41:49

what they went with was religious

41:52

discrimination because

41:55

Ramsey had very clearly tied

41:58

his positions on COVID. 19

42:00

and the positions on COVID

42:02

19 to their

42:04

religion. And

42:07

the thing about it is that like that

42:09

really, you know, so

42:11

this guy basically said, this

42:15

is discrimination against people who don't

42:17

have their religion. They called

42:19

it, some people are calling

42:21

it reverse discrimination, meaning

42:23

you're not of the religion and

42:25

therefore you're being discriminated against rather

42:27

than being discriminated against for having

42:31

an opposing religious belief. Cause it's not like

42:33

it was a hit one of his religious beliefs

42:37

to wear a mask. Although that's

42:39

how they framed it. They like his lawyers

42:41

framed it as like, he

42:44

has a religious belief of the

42:46

golden rule. Basically

42:49

saying, you know, if do unto others as you

42:51

would have them would do unto you. And

42:54

that required him to wear a

42:56

mask and to social distance and

42:58

to comply with the fucking CDC

43:01

recommendations, et cetera. Anyway,

43:06

that was dismissed in US district court.

43:09

They appealed and

43:12

the sixth circuit, the

43:14

court of appeals overruled

43:17

that district court judge and

43:20

said, no, this actually does

43:23

because the, the, the district court

43:26

judge basically said that he had

43:28

failed to, to

43:30

demonstrate that there was any discrimination.

43:36

And the sixth circuit said, no,

43:39

this is discrimination based on religious

43:42

non conformity, meaning not, you're

43:44

not forming to our religious

43:46

things. Yeah. And therefore, try

43:48

again, you have to,

43:50

you have to try this case. Okay.

43:53

So there you go. Man,

43:55

these things take a long time. Court

43:59

system is. Suing is

44:01

the worst. Yeah. Lawsuits

44:03

are the worst. Anyway,

44:05

there you go. A little bit of

44:07

triumph, a little bit of sense in the world. Hopefully

44:11

that goes well for that guy. And

44:15

there you go. If you would like to tell us

44:17

all about your encounters with,

44:20

I don't know, Dave Ramsey or bad bosses

44:23

or whatever, or anything

44:25

that we've talked about, please feel free

44:27

to write into us, podcast at thankgodimatheist.com.

44:30

Or call and leave us a voicemail message.

44:32

The telephone number is 424-666-8442. Stick

44:38

around. There's more show coming up. Well,

44:41

Frank, we do the

44:43

show and then people

44:45

write into us about

44:48

stuff. That's

45:00

how it works. We invite them to.

45:02

We just invited them to. So

45:05

here are a few things. We got in

45:08

a little bit of hot water with some

45:10

of our listeners. You'll

45:12

recall that we, a couple

45:14

weeks ago, we talked

45:17

about a priest

45:20

who was on Grindr, who got in some trouble,

45:22

who got outed. And

45:24

you and I had perhaps

45:28

not enough sympathy for him. I

45:32

think we, I mean, the tack that we took

45:34

was that like, you don't out

45:36

people. But if someone's

45:38

a horrible hypocrite and it's hurting everybody,

45:41

it's hurting a bunch of people. Yeah.

45:44

Meaning a priest, you know, our

45:46

anyway, some people wrote in, wrote

45:48

into us. I think we're going to need to clarify

45:51

whether that is still our opinion or not. Anyway,

45:53

here's a few things that people had to

45:56

say. This is from Casey who said, OK,

45:58

guys, you're going to have to explain this.

46:00

to me further. I don't understand

46:02

how outing a married guy for being

46:04

on Grindr is any different than outing

46:06

a gay priest. Both have

46:09

taken vows and are committing acts

46:11

against those vows in secret. Same,

46:14

same. Casey goes

46:16

on to talk about how they have

46:18

a family member

46:20

whose husband was

46:25

having illicit gay affairs behind

46:28

his wife's back. Anyway,

46:32

it's quite long, but Casey

46:34

says, sorry, but you cannot pretend to

46:37

be married and then fuck around behind

46:39

your partner's back no matter what your

46:41

sexual preferences are. That is

46:44

just bad practices as a person, as

46:47

an atheist, just all around decent

46:49

human. Cheating is wrong, it

46:51

just is. And

46:54

being a responsible human is about being honest. Anyway,

46:57

I think that, I

46:59

think, and I'll be interested to hear what you have

47:01

to say, but I think that it's

47:04

not the same. That being a priest is not the

47:06

same as, yes, they made vows, but

47:10

those vows are wildly different vows.

47:12

One vow is like, well,

47:16

it's to God, technically, but

47:19

the thing that a priest takes on

47:21

is public, is a public trust and

47:23

is something that affects thousands

47:29

of people. And

47:33

that is very different. If

47:35

someone gets married, one

47:37

person has to trust that person. And

47:40

the rest of us, it's none of

47:42

our goddamn business. Well, and also, let's

47:45

say you're privy to

47:49

the fact that somebody's cheating on their spouse, and

47:53

you going and telling the

47:55

spouse that's being cheated on,

47:57

you're informing them that that

48:00

they're being cheated on, right? You're

48:02

not publicly outing the cheater,

48:05

right, for

48:07

being gay, if they are, right? Or

48:10

for whatever they're doing. And if you

48:12

do that, you're going

48:15

a step too far. Yeah, going and

48:17

publicly announcing this kind of stuff, posting

48:19

about it on Facebook or something like

48:22

that would be wrong, right? Right.

48:24

Because that person has not, I mean, if

48:28

that person were in a, it's

48:30

different if they're in a public position

48:32

where they were taking a stand against

48:35

gay people. Correct. And they're secretly

48:37

gay. Right. You know what

48:39

I mean? A politician or a priest

48:41

who is taking a very public stance

48:43

against, that hurts all

48:46

gay people. Yeah. And

48:48

then they're actually gay, that's a different

48:50

thing. I'm not sure that I feel

48:52

like I'm still very uncomfortable with the

48:54

idea of outing them. Oh,

48:57

I'm not. I think that they deserve to

48:59

be outed. Because that is the, so

49:06

when you go to the person and

49:08

say, who's being cheated

49:10

on, right? And you sit them

49:12

down and you're like, hey, this is what's going on.

49:15

This is what I've witnessed

49:17

or have heard or

49:19

whatever. It's the exact

49:22

same thing as telling the public

49:24

that this person has influence over,

49:27

right? Right. Yeah, I

49:29

mean, the public who trusts this

49:31

person deserves to

49:33

know the believers and

49:36

the non-believers, the gay people and the

49:38

straight people. They all deserve to know.

49:40

I mean, what's important here is who's

49:42

the interested party. Because who's been violated

49:44

in this, right? Whose

49:46

trust has been violated, right? Yeah.

49:49

And it goes for politicians and it goes

49:51

for, I think probably more

49:54

senior type religious folk.

49:57

I don't think maybe your parish priest deserves

49:59

it. the

50:01

horrible consequences that this guy deserves. And maybe

50:03

that's going a little bit back on kind

50:05

of the rationale that I was just laying

50:07

out, but a

50:10

parish priest can be a little bit of a victim

50:12

of a system. Yeah. Whereas

50:14

if you're the head of that system,

50:16

you deserve to be called out for

50:18

it. And a parish priest who's part

50:21

of the system, but doesn't rail against

50:23

gay people or whatever. Right.

50:27

I mean, there probably is a

50:29

proportionality question in all of this.

50:31

And so for me, I have

50:34

serious empathy for anybody

50:37

who is closeted

50:39

and who doesn't know

50:41

the way out. I

50:44

don't have a lot of empathy if you're

50:48

a leader in an organization.

50:51

But I still do have empathy for

50:53

that person. What they're going through

50:55

on a human level ain't

50:57

great. But there's

50:59

a certain amount of if you're going

51:02

to be a leader in the Catholic Church, which

51:04

this guy was that we were talking about, and

51:07

then you're going and hooking up

51:09

on Grindr for Christ's sake. This

51:11

isn't about some quiet

51:14

affair somewhere. He's hooking up on fucking

51:16

Grindr. Right. Right. I

51:19

don't know. Like, I mean,

51:21

if you want to hook up on Grindr, great. Go

51:23

do it. But know that there's

51:26

a chance you're going to get caught. I

51:28

don't have a lot of sympathy for this

51:30

particular guy. He was doing something on a

51:32

fairly public, like anybody can get on Grindr.

51:35

Right. Now, I doubt

51:37

he was posting his picture. Right. In

51:40

fact, I'd be shocked to find out that

51:42

he was posting a picture of his face.

51:44

Maybe he was posting other pictures. Yeah.

51:46

But people are pretty dumb. A

51:49

lot of people. Usually, the guys who are looking for a hookup are

51:53

it's not their face. Right. They're posting

51:55

a picture of their junk or just

51:58

leaving it blank or whatever. So anyway,

52:01

body parts, they think, are going

52:03

to be played to

52:05

the best advantage. So I mean, that's,

52:09

I hear the writer's

52:12

concern, but I do

52:14

think it's different. Yeah. And I, you know,

52:16

we had another, uh, another email

52:18

from Joe that was, uh, you

52:21

know, basically saying that the same

52:23

thing that, that he

52:25

was shocked, uh, taken aback, uh,

52:28

by our comments. Uh, and

52:30

so I, and I, you know, I

52:32

get it, but I think we've answered it. I think,

52:35

I think, I think the idea, I think

52:38

the salient point in what, in what

52:40

you said that hit home for me

52:42

is yeah, who are the interested parties?

52:44

Yeah. Because it's important that, that they

52:46

know that their trust has been breached.

52:49

Yeah. And with a priest, the

52:52

interested parties are the public. Yeah. And

52:54

the same with a, with a politician. Yeah.

52:57

And so I guess for the parish priest,

52:59

I would feel, I would feel worse

53:02

for him than I would for the,

53:04

this leader guy. I don't really feel bad for him.

53:07

Right. Um, I, I,

53:09

I, I feel

53:11

bad that he's in

53:13

a tough situation that

53:15

he's denied himself. Um,

53:18

the happiness that living,

53:20

uh, a life out of

53:22

the closet could be. Yeah.

53:25

Um, but he'd have to give

53:28

up, um, a

53:30

lot in order to do that. See,

53:32

he's in a tricky, he's in a

53:34

tricky, awful position. Right. But the fact

53:36

of the matter is, is leaders in

53:39

an organization like the Catholic church who

53:41

are out cavorting and

53:44

whatnot, I think they deserve it. There.

53:46

I've said it now five different times.

53:49

They deserve it. That's that, that, that's

53:51

our position and we're sticking with it.

53:53

Apparently. Uh, Alexandra wrote

53:55

in to say, Hey, Frank and Dan, or

53:57

well, Frank eel and Danlin is. is

54:00

what she wrote. Okay. The

54:02

Christians have already given us the perfect symbol.

54:04

This is in relation to our conversation

54:07

about an atheist symbol, which

54:09

by the way, I'm

54:11

gonna say, you and

54:13

I, after we recorded last

54:15

week, had a delightful

54:18

little back and forth. As

54:22

we were looking up the null set

54:24

thing, because I really liked these, not

54:26

the oval one, but the circle with

54:29

the slash through it, and

54:31

I was Googling it, and I was looking at all these

54:33

different things. I think I might make merch.

54:35

I think we really might make merch. There's

54:38

no announcement happening yet, but I'm in

54:40

the process of getting merch with the

54:42

null set. Because

54:45

one of the things that's great about

54:48

it is that that symbol is also

54:50

just a letter in several of the

54:52

Scandinavian languages. And when

54:54

we clicked on, I texted you and

54:56

said, you

54:59

have to click on the sound that

55:01

that makes, because it is

55:03

the sound of atheism, because

55:06

that letter is ee. Like

55:10

literally, on the Wikipedia page for that letter, it

55:16

just, you can click on the little thing, and

55:18

it has a guy that goes ee. Which

55:22

sounds like you just

55:24

heard something disgusting. It's like, well,

55:26

and then you and I were joking that it was

55:29

like, oh, the missionaries have come to the, you open

55:31

the door after you hear a knock, and it's them,

55:33

and you just go ee. You

55:39

find out that you're on a date with

55:41

someone who's super Jesus-y, and then you're just like ee.

55:44

Ee. Anyway,

55:49

this is what Alexandra has to say, which is

55:52

that the Christians have already given us the perfect

55:54

symbol we need to wear as

55:56

jewelry and tattoos. 666,

55:59

or if you prefer. one of the more subtle versions a

56:01

barcode or a QR code will do. I can't

56:05

quite remember off the top of my head

56:07

which crazy Christian end times movie it was

56:09

but I once saw one that had a

56:11

really cool stylized mark of the beast with

56:13

the three sixes arranged like a trefoil knot.

56:16

Uh, you know, I get that

56:18

but to me that's just an

56:20

anti Christian one. Yeah symbol rather

56:22

than a pro us one. And

56:25

frankly, I don't want to identify myself

56:29

in opposition to another group. Yeah, I

56:31

don't want to. Yeah, I find with

56:34

it like get a 666 tattoo if

56:36

you want to freak out

56:38

the Christians around you do it. Which is

56:40

a that's funny a worthwhile thing to do

56:42

with your time. Absolutely.

56:46

But but yeah, I think that we we

56:49

need something that is not

56:51

connected somehow to stuff that already

56:53

has meaning because it's already a

56:55

sort of a symbol for

56:58

something else. Right? Yeah, I mean,

57:00

I'm I look if you are

57:02

an anti Christian and anti Christ

57:05

if you will. Yeah, please feel

57:07

free to take on that symbol.

57:09

I think that that's that's fine.

57:12

But I don't think I don't think it

57:14

quite fulfills our brief. Which

57:18

is fine. Joe has

57:20

written in Joe in Alaska has written in

57:22

saying Frank and Dan listening to your latest

57:25

episode where you covered failed

57:27

Rapture prophecies reminded

57:29

me of a prank of

57:31

an army buddy and I pulled his

57:34

neighbor was all about crazy religious beliefs

57:37

and just knew that the rapture was coming

57:39

on a predicted date. The neighbor

57:42

was very judgmental surprise and would tell

57:44

my buddy that he would burn in

57:46

hell for divorcing his wife and not

57:48

being a member of their church. Oh,

57:50

wow. So on the day of the

57:52

expected Rapture, I went to my buddy's house, he and I

57:54

made a point of saying hello

57:56

to the neighbor that morning while standing in

57:58

the front yard. We stayed

58:01

there for a while and watched the neighbor go

58:03

into their house. My buddy and I ran into

58:05

his house, changed clothes, placed

58:07

our other set on the

58:09

front lawn, and used tang

58:11

powder. Do you remember tang?

58:13

Yeah, delicious. Orange tang powder

58:16

to draw our heads and arms where

58:18

our body parts would be. We

58:21

also sprinkled some powder on the clothes to make

58:23

it look like we turned to dust. Oh, wow.

58:25

We sat in his house looking out the window

58:27

and saw the neighbor gaze into the lawn at

58:30

our clothes. Crazy neighbor looked around

58:32

and then up at the sky.

58:35

They were quite irate when they saw us

58:37

very much alive. Then

58:41

they also completely stopped speaking to my

58:43

buddy after that. I bet they did.

58:45

Yeah, probably no great loss. Yeah,

58:48

that's a fun prank. Not great

58:50

for neighbor relations. I

58:53

hope he didn't have any fence disputes

58:55

after or anything like that where they

58:58

had to work

59:00

together on something. Indeed.

59:02

Well friends, if you are

59:05

enjoying the show, if you're a

59:07

fan of us doing this, because

59:09

this is the thing that we do, we

59:12

would greatly appreciate it if you would

59:15

either consider giving us your

59:17

money, which is a thing

59:19

that is the only way that, you know, we don't

59:21

do ads or anything. So this is the only way

59:23

that we get any money for doing this. And

59:26

you can do that by going to

59:29

thank God I'm atheist.com/donate and

59:31

that'll send you, you know, you got a

59:34

way to go to our our Patreon and

59:36

if you go to our Patreon and you become

59:38

a patron at the right level, you'd

59:41

not only get this show, but

59:43

you get the Frank and Dan diary.

59:45

Oh my God. Bonus content

59:47

every week. We do it for

59:50

you. It's so good. It's

59:53

we are delightful. Don't

59:55

you want more of this? It's only

59:58

not this. It's just us. Uh,

1:00:00

Todd talking about things that interest us

1:00:02

that aren't this show. Anywho,

1:00:05

uh, that's free. That that's, that's not

1:00:07

free. Well, I don't know. It's our

1:00:09

gift to you. Uh,

1:00:11

if you're a patron at a certain level,

1:00:14

so we would appreciate that. If you can't

1:00:16

afford to become a patron, that's okay

1:00:18

too. We definitely understand that that's, uh, but

1:00:21

find ways, you know, you can, you

1:00:23

can review us on, on

1:00:25

the iTunes or wherever you're listening, you

1:00:27

can tell friends about the show, uh,

1:00:31

helping us grow is, is a very

1:00:33

important thing too. So anything

1:00:35

you can do to help. We appreciate. Uh,

1:00:38

and I think we have one person

1:00:40

to appreciate the extra most. We do

1:00:42

indeed Dan our top donor, our

1:00:45

Lord and savior, Davis.

1:00:49

More show coming up. All

1:01:00

right, Frank, listen, Richard

1:01:03

Dawkins is done. Uh,

1:01:06

well, yeah, we knew that we fired

1:01:08

him a long time ago and he

1:01:11

did not get the memo. Uh,

1:01:14

yeah, for those of you who don't know, maybe

1:01:17

there are some people don't know who Richard Dawkins

1:01:19

is. He was a, he

1:01:21

was a hero of the atheist movement

1:01:23

for a while. God. He wrote, he

1:01:26

wrote, uh, uh, the,

1:01:28

the God delusion. Yeah.

1:01:30

That, that was him, right? Yeah.

1:01:32

Yeah. That sounds right. He's a,

1:01:35

he's an evolutionary biologist. So, uh,

1:01:37

but he's also like a

1:01:40

old dude. Um, and

1:01:42

the thing is that, uh,

1:01:47

he has stopped being good. Uh,

1:01:49

he doesn't produce anything like that

1:01:52

forwards the atheist thing anymore. What he

1:01:54

does now is be

1:01:56

mean to trans people on Twitter. It's

1:01:59

free. remarkable It's

1:02:01

all I ever hear about him now. Yeah

1:02:05

Yeah, I this is this

1:02:07

is a bad retirement Dawkins Stay

1:02:11

off my lawn is perfectly reasonable at

1:02:13

your age. Just yeah do that. Yeah,

1:02:16

and But

1:02:18

instead he has decided to chime in on all

1:02:20

sorts of things Including

1:02:22

a recent tweet where he said where

1:02:25

he commented on Uh No,

1:02:29

and this has been a whole thing. Yeah Olympic

1:02:33

Woman boxer Iman Khalif

1:02:37

mm-hmm an Algerian who

1:02:40

won the gold, right? She

1:02:44

has very masculine features it's true

1:02:47

but this woman was assigned

1:02:50

female at birth because

1:02:54

she had female parts

1:02:58

she was raised a Girl,

1:03:01

she grew up to be a woman. She

1:03:04

identifies as a woman. This is a cis

1:03:06

woman Yeah, now a

1:03:09

few years ago. She had an issue where she

1:03:11

where she was competing in

1:03:13

a net in an international thing

1:03:16

in Russia and the

1:03:19

Russian Organization

1:03:23

that that was sponsoring the event Accused

1:03:27

her suspiciously after she

1:03:29

had beaten their Russian

1:03:34

Entry into this tournament or whatever was

1:03:37

they they they came out and said that she

1:03:39

had tested xy chromosomes

1:03:41

and They they

1:03:44

disqualified her now

1:03:47

listen human beings

1:03:49

are complex creatures and biological

1:03:51

sex and gender are Really

1:03:55

complex issues and there's not just a

1:03:57

binary. We know this you

1:03:59

can be X Y and have

1:04:02

you know a vagina and breasts and

1:04:05

and you know be

1:04:07

a woman X Y

1:04:10

chromosomes do not determine your biological

1:04:12

sex there's a

1:04:14

lot of stuff that goes

1:04:16

on that determines biological sex

1:04:18

hmm anyway one

1:04:21

person who should definitely know

1:04:24

that biological sex is

1:04:27

has many many different things

1:04:29

that determine it is Richard

1:04:31

Dawkins evolutionary biologist who

1:04:34

ends up say who ended up

1:04:36

tweeting recently two men masquerading

1:04:38

as women are being allowed

1:04:41

to box against real women

1:04:43

in the Olympics these

1:04:47

are neither of the people that he is talking

1:04:49

about are men or have

1:04:52

ever been men or were assigned

1:04:54

male or female male

1:04:56

at birth or anything they're not

1:04:58

trans people right these

1:05:01

are women they literally

1:05:04

what drives me crazy about this and

1:05:06

of course you know JK Rowling

1:05:09

jumped on this thing and yeah

1:05:12

like the entire twitters twittersphere

1:05:15

the ex exoplanet

1:05:20

was was a all abuzz and

1:05:25

it's what's hilarious to me about this

1:05:28

is that this is going

1:05:30

literally against everything that

1:05:32

the anti-trans people have been saying this

1:05:34

whole time because what the

1:05:37

anti-trans people have been doing this whole

1:05:39

time is we know

1:05:41

what a woman is a woman is

1:05:43

a person who has a vagina when they're born

1:05:45

and who is raised a girl

1:05:47

and blah blah blah that's what a woman

1:05:49

is we know it and

1:05:53

now they

1:05:55

see a woman who is you know

1:05:58

whose face looks man masculine

1:06:01

whose body is very

1:06:03

powerful and They're

1:06:05

like Mmm, I

1:06:07

don't like it. I don't think it's a woman.

1:06:09

I just think

1:06:12

it's just literally

1:06:14

you're they You

1:06:17

know to some extent like You

1:06:19

know, these these are the same assholes

1:06:21

who made that that movie. What is

1:06:24

a woman? Matt

1:06:26

what's his name? Have

1:06:28

you heard of this? Hmm? Yeah, there

1:06:30

was a film called. What is a woman? Matt

1:06:33

Walsh made it this is a far

1:06:37

right nutball connected to

1:06:39

the Daily Wire Mm-hmm,

1:06:42

and it was just supposed to be this

1:06:44

gotcha question. What is a woman and And

1:06:48

all the liberals are having trouble Defining

1:06:51

it but we conservatives know exactly

1:06:53

what it is Well,

1:06:55

guess what? This woman

1:06:58

who was a this this boxer Meets

1:07:03

all of your definition. It's your

1:07:05

own definition and and

1:07:08

even that XY thing Is

1:07:10

spurious it came from

1:07:13

one source that source had a

1:07:15

vested interest in getting her disqualified Like

1:07:19

it's spurious and the Olympic and the

1:07:21

Olympic Committee doesn't fucking care about it,

1:07:24

right? So

1:07:26

anyway, I just think it's

1:07:29

so It's that whole

1:07:31

thing about like what's porn? Well, I I can't

1:07:33

define it, but I know it when I see

1:07:35

it. I Know

1:07:37

a woman when I see it. It's like It's

1:07:41

so it's like they refuse

1:07:43

I I

1:07:46

Here's what I think this proves. I Haven't

1:07:48

let you get a word in edgewise. Yeah, but here's

1:07:50

what I think you're doing fine. Here's

1:07:53

what I think this proves What

1:07:55

it proves is that they don't actually care about

1:07:59

genetics about chromosomes

1:08:02

about any what they care

1:08:04

about the science part of it. They don't care about

1:08:06

the science part of it at all The

1:08:10

nut they can scream and they

1:08:12

scream science words Mm-hmm

1:08:14

from like at the tops of their

1:08:16

lungs, but all they care about when

1:08:19

it comes right down to it is their

1:08:22

widow feelings That

1:08:24

this might that this gives them the

1:08:26

ick Mm-hmm, and

1:08:28

they can't handle it. They don't know what to do

1:08:30

with their feelings And so when

1:08:32

the science isn't on their side,

1:08:35

they don't care Right

1:08:37

the science that they've been spouting

1:08:39

suddenly doesn't matter anymore Because

1:08:42

all they care about is that

1:08:45

this has is that

1:08:47

they've decided that it's weird and they don't

1:08:49

want to deal with it well, right, I

1:08:51

mean because when

1:08:55

When somebody like this boxer comes

1:08:57

along She

1:09:01

transgresses their Against

1:09:03

their idea of what a woman is Right.

1:09:06

Yeah, and and that's that's all it

1:09:08

is and then they don't they have no

1:09:10

idea how to respond but

1:09:13

they they they have an idea in their head of

1:09:17

Woman and actually they mean

1:09:19

wife right teenage girl

1:09:22

or wife Yeah, they

1:09:24

mean baby factory and

1:09:26

sex object. Yeah, exactly and And

1:09:30

and that's that's what they want. And

1:09:32

so here's this here's this

1:09:34

woman who doesn't fit that

1:09:36

doesn't look like she fits

1:09:39

that right and That's

1:09:42

the problem they don't like it and and to

1:09:44

be honest, I think somebody like Richard Dawkins at

1:09:46

this point He's decided this is the hill he's

1:09:48

dying on and so he just keeps retweeting everything

1:09:51

Yeah, and he's like, well, this is me

1:09:53

now This is my

1:09:55

new thing. Unless do you think that it

1:09:57

was just that one thing he? He

1:10:00

went all in on it. He kept tweeting

1:10:02

things like, you know, a picture of a

1:10:04

motorcyclist in front of a bunch of like

1:10:07

bicyclists That says

1:10:10

biker who identifies as a cyclist

1:10:12

wins the Tour de France. Yeah,

1:10:14

you know Another

1:10:17

picture of a bunch of Men

1:10:21

in a foot race and it says first

1:10:23

biological cheetah who identifies as a man

1:10:26

set to take gold for the blah

1:10:28

blah blah blah Yeah, it's it's

1:10:31

such a bad argument and

1:10:33

a bad faith argument Yeah, and

1:10:36

the fact that he's willing to make it so

1:10:40

Deeply tarnishes his credentials I

1:10:42

know and his bona fides

1:10:45

as a serious person as a scientist

1:10:47

as everything that he had like built

1:10:50

His brand around right now that

1:10:53

like it's like well, I Don't

1:10:56

care how good his atheist books are at this

1:10:59

point. No, I want nothing to do with

1:11:01

them Right. I mean though they're from the

1:11:03

80s anyway, like he's Who

1:11:07

the fuck cares what he thought like he

1:11:09

was important for his time. Yeah, and I'm

1:11:11

actually really grateful for him. Mm-hmm For

1:11:15

that for being outspoken at that time.

1:11:17

Yeah, that was a really bold Powerful

1:11:20

thing that he did then and

1:11:23

now he's just shitting all over his

1:11:25

legacy. Yeah Which

1:11:27

okay by the by

1:11:29

I guess I you

1:11:32

know, we want to revere you Richard

1:11:35

But don't have heroes people. That's

1:11:37

I think that's the I

1:11:40

don't know that he was ever a hero of mine,

1:11:42

but He was somebody who?

1:11:45

There was a lot of people's here. Yeah. Yeah.

1:11:48

Yeah. Yeah, and and

1:11:50

I don't I'm very picky with my

1:11:52

heroes What you should

1:11:54

don't have I actually that's so

1:11:57

yeah, I probably yeah, it's

1:11:59

hard for me to even think of somebody that I would

1:12:01

consider a hero. Yeah, let's

1:12:04

just realize that people can do good things

1:12:06

and then also do awful things, the

1:12:09

same person. And

1:12:11

that's just how humans work. Yeah. Woohoo!

1:12:15

And then you have, yeah, all right.

1:12:17

Well, anyway, I don't care about

1:12:20

anyone's feelings about trans people. That's

1:12:24

none of anybody's business except to love them.

1:12:26

Just be nice to trans people. They're great.

1:12:29

That's your problem. So yeah, but

1:12:31

also just this whole thing about, he's

1:12:35

lying about these boxers. And

1:12:38

then his Facebook page,

1:12:41

he loses access or it gets

1:12:44

taken down momentarily. And

1:12:46

he freaks out and just starts

1:12:49

accusing Facebook of having censored

1:12:51

him. And

1:12:53

Facebook is like, no, no, no, no, no, no. Your

1:12:57

account was hacked. That's

1:12:59

what we do when your account

1:13:01

gets hacked. We shut down your account

1:13:03

because we noticed you were being hacked

1:13:05

and you're too dumb to change your

1:13:07

password. And

1:13:10

then, yeah, so there you go.

1:13:12

He's an old man, get

1:13:15

off of his lawn and

1:13:17

don't listen to him anymore.

1:13:20

That's the end. All right. Well,

1:13:23

thank you all so much for listening.

1:13:25

If you would like to write into

1:13:28

us and I don't know, defend Dawkins

1:13:30

or whatever you want to do, do

1:13:32

what you want, but write into us

1:13:34

podcast at thankgodimatheist.com. Or call and

1:13:37

leave us a voicemail message. We'd love to hear from

1:13:39

you. The telephone number is 424-666-8442. Yeah.

1:13:43

And thinking of thankgodimatheist.com, go

1:13:45

to that slash donate and

1:13:48

give us your money. This

1:13:51

episode was edited by Roger Goudy

1:13:54

and music was provided by the Red Rock Hot

1:13:56

Club and Gordon Johnston. Hey,

1:13:59

thanks all. for tuning in we sure

1:14:01

do appreciate you thanks so much bye

1:14:03

bye thank

1:14:21

automatthiist as a production of TGIA media

1:14:23

LLC copyright 2024 all rights reserved

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features