0:45

All

0:47

righty then . Ladies

0:49

and gentlemen , welcome back

0:52

to another episode

0:54

of Privacy , please . I

0:56

am your host , cameron

0:58

Ivey , and my goodness

1:02

do I have some juicy

1:04

, juicy , juicy money , money

1:07

, money , juicy , ju-ju-ju-ju-juicy Money , money , money

1:11

, Money . You know what I'm saying , but

1:13

, seriously , I got some juicy news

1:15

. If you haven't heard yet , we're

1:17

going to go ahead and dig into this . But

1:26

first I must say this is Rumor . Has it in Privacy ? And this one's not so much

1:28

of a rumor . Rumor has it in privacy and this one's not so much of a rumor

1:30

. But I am so interested to hear

1:32

what everybody else in the industry is thinking about

1:35

this . So , without

1:37

further ado , let's dig in

1:40

. Yes

1:42

, arizona

1:45

Lawmaker uses ChatGPT

1:47

to define deep fakes and

1:50

new legislation . Let's

1:59

sit for a second . You heard that right . You

2:01

heard that right In a pioneering

2:03

move Arizona

2:07

State Representative Alexander Kaludin . Arizona

2:09

state representative alexander colluden I think I said that right

2:11

leverage the power of artificial

2:13

intelligence to craft a

2:15

new law regulating deep fakes in

2:18

elections . Colluden turned to

2:20

chat gpt an ai

2:22

chatbot we all know

2:24

to define digital impersonation

2:27

. In his bill , kaludin , a Republican

2:29

, admitted that he struggled with

2:31

the technology jargon

2:34

necessary for the legislation . I

2:36

thought let me just ask the expert

2:38

. He said the chatbot's

2:40

definition closely mirrors the language

2:43

in the final bill . Kaludin's

2:45

proposal received unanimous

2:47

support in both legislative chambers

2:49

and was recently signed into law

2:51

by the Democratic governor . The legislation

2:54

offers candidates or residents

2:56

in Arizona a judicial

2:59

process to verify the authenticity

3:01

of suspected deepfakes

3:03

, thus providing a

3:05

way to counter AI-driven

3:07

misinformation . How

3:10

do we know that this chat GPT

3:12

generated bill wasn't

3:14

misinformed or misinformation

3:17

? How do we know that ? Do we check with chat GPT

3:20

? On his chat GPT and

3:26

I quote , I am

3:28

by no means a computer scientist Kluden

3:31

explained I needed to ensure the definition

3:33

was accurate and comprehensive . Chatgpt

3:36

provided the baseline and I added

3:38

protections for human rights and exclusions

3:41

for comedy , satire and

3:43

artistic expression . Kluden

3:45

has found ChatGPT useful in other legislative

3:48

tasks helping draft amendments

3:50

and saving time . Well

3:53

gosh

3:56

, that's the first time I've ever

3:58

heard that line before . I

4:08

lost my train of thought . Where am I ? Hello , hello

4:10

. He tweeted that

4:12

in a response to an article about his

4:14

use of the AI in his legislation

4:16

. While the federal government has

4:18

yet to regulate AI in elections

4:21

, many states are taking action . Kaludin's

4:23

bill offers a unique approach by allowing

4:26

courts to determine the truthfulness

4:28

of deepfakes rather than outing

4:30

or outright banning them . This

4:33

method aims to balance free speech

4:35

rights while addressing the misuse

4:37

of technology , the

4:40

misuse of technology . The

4:42

misuse of technology , the

4:44

misuse of techno

4:47

. Sorry , the bill

4:49

includes specific provisions

4:51

for removing deepfakes that depict

4:54

sexual acts or nudity , particularly

4:57

if the person is not a public

4:59

figure and the publisher knew the content

5:02

was false . Unlike other states

5:04

requiring disclaimers on AI-generated

5:06

content , gluden's bill provides

5:09

flexibility . If a publisher

5:11

clearly indicates that the content is a

5:13

deepfake , legal action may not

5:15

be necessary . Kluden

5:17

believes mandatory

5:19

disclaimers could interfere with the message's

5:22

impact or humor . Kluden

5:25

hopes Arizona's legislation

5:29

will serve as a model for other states

5:31

. He appreciates the role of deep fakes in

5:33

political discourse , but emphasizes

5:35

the need for responsible use . When

5:38

politicians regulate speech , it's

5:40

like a fox guarding the hen house , he

5:42

noted . I hope other state legislators

5:44

adopt a similar approach . End

5:47

, end quote . Oh

5:49

Listen

5:54

, I'm all for using ChatGPT to save

5:56

time , give you structure

5:58

and certain things and ideas and

6:01

using that . This

6:05

is interesting , the

6:07

honesty . I can get behind

6:09

someone who's honest about

6:12

something like this . But then , on the other hand , this

6:14

thing was passed already . This

6:17

law was passed and it was basically generated

6:19

by artificial intelligence . So

6:21

my emotions are very mixed here . I'm

6:25

not a very political person , but I

6:27

am interested in the privacy community

6:29

and your thoughts Because

6:33

I know this

6:35

is going to be a hot topic . So

6:37

chime in in the comments . Let's

6:40

go , let me hear it , let's

6:43

debate , let's talk . I love you all . I

6:45

don't know I froze up there for a second . Thanks so

6:47

much for tuning in . If you're listening from

6:49

the podcast , send in your comments , go

6:52

on social media , linkedin , follow me , whatever

6:54

you need to . Let's chime in

6:56

and debate about

6:59

this , because I don't know , this

7:02

is crazy . It seems crazy , right , or

7:05

am I crazy ? I don't know . It's very interesting

7:07

, anyways , cameron Ivey , over

7:10

and out .