Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This episode is brought to you by Progressive.
0:02
Are you driving your car or doing laundry
0:04
right now? Podcasts go best when they're bundled
0:07
with another activity. Like Progressive Home
0:09
and Auto policies, they're best when they're
0:11
bundled too. Having these two policies together
0:13
makes insurance easier and could help you
0:16
save. Customers who save by switching
0:18
their home and car insurance to Progressive save nearly
0:20
$800 on average. Quote
0:23
a home and car bundle today
0:25
at progressive.com. The use of
0:27
casualty insurance company and affiliates. National
0:30
average 12 month savings of $793 by new
0:32
customers surveyed who saved with Progressive between June
0:34
2021 and May 2022. Potential
0:38
savings will vary. The fall of
0:40
1961 was a happening time. Time
0:44
for this nation to take a
0:46
clearly leading role in
0:48
space achievement. There was a
0:50
glamorous young couple in the White House with
0:53
a President hell bent on going to the
0:55
moon. The civil rights movement
0:57
was gaining momentum. The
0:59
ride had become a symbol of
1:01
the fight against segregation, not only
1:03
in southern bus terminals, but
1:05
everywhere. The swinging 60s
1:08
were just revving up. Bob
1:10
Dylan gave his first concert at Carnegie
1:12
Hall and Brian Epstein heard
1:14
the Beatles for the first time
1:16
in Liverpool, England. In
1:18
Germany and elsewhere around the world, a
1:21
sedative called Phyllidimide had been selling
1:24
like mad for several years. Kemi
1:27
Grunenthal, the manufacturer of that
1:29
sedative, was profiting wildly. But
1:33
there was a pocket of people in
1:35
a world of heart. I'm
1:39
Katie Haffner, and this is
1:41
the third chapter of The Devil in
1:43
the Details, a special series from Lost
1:45
Women of Science. In
1:47
this episode, we explore the
1:49
proverbial shit hitting the proverbial
1:51
fan. In
1:58
the fall of 1961, In 1961
2:01
in the United States, Dr.
2:03
Francis Kelsey continued to stall
2:05
the application for thalidomide, much
2:07
to the frustration of the
2:09
manufacturer William S. Merrill. At
2:12
the same time, in Europe, women
2:14
by the thousands had given birth
2:16
to children severely injured while in
2:19
the womb, and several doctors had
2:21
taken notice. Most notably,
2:23
Wiederkent Lenz, the skeptical pediatrician,
2:26
had been investigating for several
2:28
months. He and
2:30
Carl Schultehillen, the father of one of
2:32
these babies, were talking to as many
2:35
affected families as they could find. But
2:38
there was no obvious culprit. Then,
2:41
on November 11th, the story began
2:43
to shift. That
2:46
day, Wiederkent had gone to meet a family,
2:48
this time on his own. They
2:50
were the parents of a girl born without
2:52
arms. The mother
2:55
mentioned she had taken
2:57
Conturgan, Grunenthal's thalidomide-based sedative.
3:00
The following day, Wiederkent visited
3:02
another family. As usual,
3:04
he introduced himself and explained that he
3:06
was trying to figure out what was
3:09
causing these strange births. And
3:11
for the second time, in as
3:13
many days, Conturgan came up. The
3:16
father told Wiederkent plainly he
3:18
thought Conturgan was the cause.
3:21
Okay, Conturgan had come up before, but
3:23
it had never been at the top
3:25
of Wiederkent's list. Maybe
3:27
because many of the families he'd interviewed
3:29
did not mention Conturgan, or maybe he,
3:31
too, had been
3:34
influenced by the company's bold safety
3:36
claims. But two days in
3:38
a row? This time,
3:40
Wiederkent paid attention. He
3:42
asked the father what made him
3:44
suspect Conturgan. The
3:47
father said he'd read that these
3:49
tablets could cause nerve damage. By
3:51
then, the news about the peripheral
3:53
neuritis had traveled. After
3:55
the meeting, Wiederkent called up Carl, and
3:58
he asked him this. treatments.
6:01
It was part of a nationwide
6:03
effort to treat soldiers fighting in
6:05
malaria zones. It put her in
6:07
a unique, an absolutely unique position
6:10
in my opinion. Trent Stephens is
6:12
the co-author of Dark Remedy, a
6:14
book about the history of thalidomide.
6:16
He's also a developmental biologist who's
6:19
studied thalidomide's effects on embryos. And
6:22
he says that during her time
6:24
in Geiling's lab, Frances got to
6:26
work with quinine, a
6:28
well-known anti-malarial medication. She
6:31
and Ellis Kelsey were testing how
6:33
rabbits broke it down in their
6:35
livers, and that included pregnant rabbits.
6:37
One of the things they learned during
6:39
their research on quinine is that it
6:42
passes the so-called placental barrier. In
6:47
quinine's case, Frances was fascinated
6:49
to discover that rabbits in
6:51
utero processed quinine very differently
6:53
than adult rabbits did. Adult
6:55
rabbit livers are very good
6:57
at breaking down quinine, which is
7:00
important because if your body
7:02
doesn't break down a drug, it
7:04
can accumulate in your system beyond
7:06
what's safe. And
7:08
it turned out that fetal rabbits
7:11
cannot break down quinine at all.
7:15
So Frances Kelsey knew that just
7:17
because a drug didn't seem to
7:19
hurt an adult, that did not
7:21
mean it wouldn't hurt a developing
7:23
embryo. In fact,
7:25
during her own pregnancies, she
7:27
was very careful about taking
7:29
any drugs. And actually,
7:32
around the time Frances joined the
7:34
FDA, there was a growing understanding
7:36
of this. Children,
7:38
babies, and fetuses aren't just
7:41
adults in miniature. Their bodies
7:43
work differently. So you
7:45
can't assume that because a drug is safe
7:47
for an adult, it will be safe at
7:50
other stages of development. Meryl
8:00
about safety during pregnancy, and
8:02
it wasn't the first time.
8:05
She'd asked about it a few months
8:07
earlier too and she didn't get a
8:09
satisfactory answer. Now Meryl did
8:12
have some evidence about the use of
8:14
thalidomide in pregnancy. The company
8:16
told Francis they weren't aware of any
8:18
problems, but the company had only tried
8:20
it out in late pregnancy. Francis
8:23
didn't think that was good enough.
8:25
The FDA needed to know what
8:27
happened if thalidomide was taken throughout
8:30
pregnancy, and she was right to
8:32
insist on that. As we know
8:34
now, thalidomide is most damaging when taken
8:36
in the first few weeks, but
8:39
Meryl refused to conduct such a study.
8:42
Of course, conducting another study would mean
8:44
yet another delay in getting this drug
8:46
to market, but Meryl did
8:48
agree to add a warning to
8:51
its labels indicating that thalidomide's effects
8:53
on pregnancy were not known. Still,
8:57
Francis Kelsey was not ready
8:59
to approve the drug. And
9:02
that should have been enough to keep Americans safe,
9:04
right? The drug wasn't for sale
9:06
in the US. But here's
9:09
the problem. While Meryl and the
9:11
FDA went back and forth about
9:13
labeling and studies and paperwork, hundreds
9:15
of pregnant women were already taking
9:17
thalidomide in the United States. Some
9:20
had brought it back from overseas, but
9:23
many of them got thalidomide from their
9:25
doctors. Because Meryl had
9:27
distributed Kevadon, its thalidomide pill,
9:30
across the United States without
9:32
any FDA approval or oversight.
9:35
And back then, that
9:37
was completely legal. Hi,
9:47
I'm Katie Hafner, co-executive producer of
9:49
Lost Women of Science. We
9:51
need your help. Tracking down
9:54
all the information that makes
9:56
our stories so rich and
9:58
engaging and original. is
10:00
no easy thing. Imagine
10:02
being confronted with boxes full of hundreds
10:04
of letters in handwriting that's hard to
10:06
read or trying to piece together someone's
10:09
life with just her name to go
10:11
on. Your donations
10:13
make this work possible. Help
10:16
us bring you more stories of remarkable
10:18
women. There's a prominent donate
10:20
button on our website. All you have to
10:23
do is click. Please
10:26
visit lostwomenofscience.org. That's
10:29
lostwomenofscience.org. The
10:34
dogs are going to, this is going to take a moment.
10:36
Sorry. I think
10:38
it's inevitable that the pets are going to
10:40
feature in this. Gwen Rickman
10:43
lives in Cincinnati with a
10:45
menagerie of pets. I have
10:47
two shelters and two
10:49
cats. Ella, our senior producer,
10:51
called Gwen up on Zoom a few
10:53
months ago. Gwen closed the door
10:55
to keep the pets out, but some
10:57
were insisting on joining anyway. That
11:00
sounds like Arwen, the small female who's
11:02
making all the noise at the moment.
11:05
She has to say something about
11:07
everything. Gwen is in her early
11:09
60s now, and she's a thalidomide
11:11
survivor. She was born in Cincinnati
11:13
in May 1962. And
11:16
pay attention to that date, May 1962,
11:20
at least a year after
11:22
Francis Kelsey first asked Mero
11:25
for evidence that thalidomide was
11:27
safe to take during pregnancy.
11:29
I was born with phocomelia of
11:32
both arms, which means my arms
11:34
are short and misshapen. One
11:36
arm is eight inches, the other arm is 12
11:39
inches in length. And both
11:41
feet are clubbed, meaning
11:43
they literally look like golf clubs. Until
11:45
she was about five, Gwen could walk
11:47
and play t-ball with her brothers in
11:50
the backyard by moving around on her
11:52
knees. But later, surgery that
11:54
was meant to help her actually made
11:56
it harder for her to walk, and
11:58
she started using her hands. wheelchair. Gwen
12:01
says that when she was growing up, her
12:04
parents encouraged her to be as independent as
12:06
possible and in general took a tough love
12:08
approach to raising a child with a disability.
12:11
For instance, if I tried to get
12:14
them to do something like
12:16
go get something for me that my parents
12:18
knew I could do, my parents
12:21
would say, are you handicapped or something? Go
12:23
do it yourself. Gwen says she didn't ask
12:25
her parents a lot of questions about her
12:27
disability because it was clear they didn't want
12:29
to talk about it. So for
12:31
years, she assumed her folk
12:34
omelea was genetic. There are in
12:36
fact very rare genetic conditions that
12:38
cause folk omelea, the shortening of
12:40
the limbs, but Gwen's
12:42
condition wasn't genetic. I
12:45
didn't actually hear the word thalidomide until
12:47
I was like seventh, eighth grade. Gwen
12:49
went to a public school for kids
12:51
with physical disabilities and like at most
12:54
schools around middle school, the teachers split
12:56
up the boys and the girls to
12:58
talk about sex education. And
13:01
they said if anybody
13:03
wants to find out if you could pass
13:05
your disability on to a baby, we'll be
13:07
happy to talk to you. And
13:10
so when I came home that night, mom
13:12
said, so how did
13:14
it go? So Gwen told her mom
13:16
about the baby conversation and she
13:19
said she didn't have a lot of questions
13:21
for the nurse because she already knew her
13:23
condition was genetic. And my mom said, well
13:25
that's not actually the case. And
13:28
I said, well, what is it then?
13:30
And that's when she said it's
13:33
from a drug called thalidomide that I was
13:35
given when I was pregnant with you. And
13:38
that was it. Conversation over.
13:41
Gwen eventually learned that her mom
13:43
had been given thalidomide sometime around
13:45
October 1961 during
13:48
her first weeks of pregnancy. In
13:51
October 1961, Kevadon was of course not
13:54
for sale in the United States. Frances
13:56
Kelsey had not approved the drug. But just
13:59
because because the drug wasn't
14:01
approved didn't mean the company
14:03
couldn't distribute it in its
14:05
so-called clinical trials. Now,
14:09
when I use the phrase
14:12
clinical trials, you might be
14:14
imagining a rigorous placebo-controlled study
14:16
with patients systematically recruited and
14:18
symptoms carefully tracked on clipboards.
14:22
Well, that's not how things worked back then.
14:24
Drug companies didn't actually need approval from
14:26
the FDA to conduct a clinical trial.
14:29
All they had to do was turn
14:31
in whatever results they had come up
14:33
with when they submitted the drug to
14:35
the FDA for approval. Okay,
14:38
we don't know for sure, but theoretically, for instance,
14:40
they could ask, you know, 100, 1,000, 10 people,
14:45
gee, how do you feel on this drug?
14:47
And somebody could say, oh, yeah, pretty darn
14:49
good. But what Merrill
14:51
had done to come up with its
14:53
results, well, it almost
14:55
defies belief. In
14:58
1958, after
15:00
Merrill first got the license from
15:02
Grunenthal to sell the littimide, the
15:04
company got busy recruiting doctors to
15:06
test the drug. Merrill
15:08
was based out of Cincinnati, and
15:11
one of those doctors was a
15:13
Cincinnati obstetrician named Ray Nelson. He
15:16
just happened to be a friend
15:18
of Merrill's director of clinical research,
15:21
Raymond Pogg. And
15:23
I think the Nelson-Pogg story
15:25
tells you everything you need
15:27
to know about these so-called
15:29
clinical trials. Nelson
15:32
treated a few hundred pregnant women
15:34
each year, and Pogg asked
15:36
Nelson to try out the littimide with
15:38
these patients to help calm their nerves
15:40
at night. In June
15:43
1961, Nelson published a
15:45
paper in the American
15:47
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
15:50
titled, Trial of the
15:52
Littimide in Insomnia Associated with the
15:54
Third Trimester. The
15:57
paper had a very upbeat conclusion. Inamide
16:00
was a safe and effective sleeping
16:02
agent for use in late pregnancy.
16:06
But here's what would eventually come out.
16:09
Ray Nelson didn't actually write
16:12
that paper. Later
16:14
on, in a legal deposition, he
16:16
admitted that Raymond Pogg, his buddy
16:19
at Merrill, had written the whole
16:21
thing. The lawyer doing
16:23
the deposition asked him, how about
16:25
all the papers cited in that article?
16:27
Did you read those? Nope.
16:30
OK, so what about all the data? Do you
16:32
have copies of the reports you sent to Merrill?
16:35
Nelson said no. It
16:37
was all verbal. And he explained
16:39
it was, quote, by telephone, or it
16:41
may have been that we had lunch
16:44
together, or it might have been when
16:46
we played golf. Dr.
16:48
Ray Nelson was the doctor
16:50
who treated when Rickman's mom.
16:54
She did say that she had only
16:56
taken one dose of the thalidomide that
16:58
she was given. But that
17:00
one pill was enough. There
17:02
are studies going back to 1990s, early
17:05
1990s, that suggest just one tablet is enough
17:07
to cause damage to the embryo. Neil
17:10
Vargasen is a professor of developmental
17:12
biology at the University of Aberdeen
17:15
in Scotland. He's
17:17
done extensive research on thalidomide's
17:19
effects. We now know
17:21
that one of the main ways
17:23
that thalidomide harms embryos is by
17:26
blocking angiogenesis, the development of
17:28
blood vessels. It's the action of the
17:30
drug on the blood vessels that's causing
17:32
the damage. And as you destroy the
17:34
blood vessels, you then get cells dying
17:36
off. And it does it in a time-dependent way.
17:39
So if an embryo is exposed to
17:41
thalidomide when the arms are forming, the
17:43
blood vessels feeding those tissues will die
17:45
and the arms won't grow. And
17:48
with the ears, the heart, the brain. That's
18:01
why many survivors have
18:03
got multiple damage. And no
18:05
two survivors look the same. They
18:07
all look unique because it was
18:10
depending on when their mom took
18:12
the medicine. There's a critical two-week
18:14
window for the kind of harm
18:17
typically associated with thalidomide, and
18:19
that window starts roughly three
18:21
weeks after fertilization. When
18:24
thalidomide is taken in that window
18:26
of time, you can find effects
18:28
on arms, heart, legs, all the
18:31
symptoms we've mentioned before. But
18:33
harm isn't restricted to that two-week
18:36
window. If you took the
18:38
drug before the so-called time-sensitive
18:40
window, you'd end up in a
18:43
miscarriage because you can imagine all the blood vessels would
18:45
be destroyed. There will be no blood vessels, so there's
18:47
no embryo. And if you took it after the so-called
18:49
time-sensitive window, you might not see
18:51
damage to limbs, but you
18:53
would see internal organ damage and possibly brain
18:55
damage as well. In
18:58
October 1961, when Gwen
19:00
Rickman's mother took that pill early in
19:03
her pregnancy, she wouldn't have known any
19:05
of this. Her doctor
19:07
wouldn't have known either. At the
19:09
time, there were at most suspicions
19:11
about thalidomide. But
19:14
it was only a few weeks
19:16
later across the Atlantic that Wiederkind
19:18
Lenz had two fateful interviews with
19:20
two families in Germany, both naming
19:22
the same suspect, Kontorgann.
19:26
So after years of women taking
19:28
this damn drug, finally Wiederkind Lenz
19:30
was about to set things in
19:32
motion. Here's
19:35
how it all unfolded. In November
19:37
of 1961, after months of investigating these
19:41
mysterious births, aggrieved father
19:43
Carl Schulte-Hillen and dogged
19:46
pediatrician Wiederkind Lenz had
19:48
gumshoed their way to a prime suspect,
19:51
Kontorgann. Here's author Jennifer
19:53
Vanderbess again. The tough part of the
19:55
story is that once Carl realizes it's
19:57
this drug, he has to go back. and
20:00
ask his wife if she took
20:02
it. At first, Linda
20:04
Schulte-Hillen couldn't remember even taking
20:06
Contregan, the German version of
20:08
the Linomide. But then
20:11
a memory surfaced. A
20:13
year earlier, when Linda was only one
20:15
month pregnant, her father had died. The
20:18
family had traveled to attend his funeral.
20:21
It was a stressful time. Nerves
20:23
were frayed. And at the
20:25
end of the day, the whole family
20:27
took a sedative, including Linda, who was
20:30
pregnant. She took one or
20:32
two, and that, in the
20:34
first trimester of pregnancy early on, immediately
20:37
affected Jan in his development.
20:40
On November 15, 1961, Veytakin called Grunenthal. He
20:46
reached a man named Heinrich Mookter.
20:48
We could dedicate an entire episode
20:51
to just this guy. But
20:53
the important thing to know right
20:55
now is that he wasn't just
20:57
any Grunenthal employee. He was the
21:00
company's chief science officer, and he
21:02
had played a key early role in
21:04
the Linomide. And
21:06
he got a cut of every
21:09
package of the Linomide sold. Veytakin
21:12
told Mookter that Grunenthal needed to
21:14
take the drug off the market
21:16
immediately, and the next
21:18
day he put that request in
21:21
writing. And he did
21:23
not mince words. He wrote in his
21:25
letter that simply waiting for proof that
21:28
the drug was harmless was
21:30
indefensible. This drug should not
21:32
be sold until it was
21:34
conclusively shown to be safe.
21:37
And then that weekend, Veytakin
21:39
attended a pediatrician's conference. And
21:42
during a session about the uptick in
21:44
Phocomelia cases being seen around the country,
21:47
he stood up. Veytakin
21:49
said that he had identified a substance
21:51
that might be to blame. He
21:54
couldn't yet prove that it was the cause
21:56
of these injuries, but it was conceivable, and
21:59
so as a citizen, he
22:02
could no longer remain silent. He
22:04
didn't want to name the drug,
22:06
but he says there is a
22:09
drug. We are pretty sure it's
22:11
causing this epidemic of thocobelia. And
22:13
he made an urgent plea right
22:15
there in public that the unnamed
22:17
substance be withdrawn from the market
22:19
immediately. He warned that each month's
22:21
delay meant dozens more babies would
22:23
be harmed. Early
22:26
the following week, Grunenthal sent three
22:29
representatives to meet with Vittacont lens
22:31
in person. He was
22:33
ready to present his case, but he
22:35
wanted witnesses present for this conversation. And
22:38
so in the afternoon of November 20th,
22:40
they met, along
22:42
with three representatives from the Hamburg
22:44
University Clinics and four from the
22:47
Hamburg Health Authorities. It
22:50
was, by all accounts, a tense
22:52
meeting. Grunenthal wanted Vittacont
22:54
to hand over all his materials.
22:57
But some of that was confidential
22:59
patient information, and some was
23:01
property of the Hamburg Clinic, and it wasn't
23:04
his to hand over. The
23:06
Grunenthal side said that if he did not
23:08
turn the material over to them, then
23:10
any delay in action would be his fault.
23:13
He said he'd consult with a lawyer and
23:15
the group would reconvene the next morning. The
23:19
following morning, he gave them copies of
23:21
his redacted notes. Now
23:23
Grunenthal tightened the screws.
23:26
The representatives said there would be
23:29
legal ramifications if Vittacont made false
23:31
accusations against the company, and
23:33
Vittacont asked them flat out, would
23:36
they guarantee that they would not
23:38
use the material he presented in
23:40
a lawsuit against him? No,
23:43
they said, they couldn't guarantee it. So
23:46
they scheduled another meeting for later
23:48
in the week, Friday, November 24,
23:50
this time in Dusseldorf, with
23:52
representatives of the Regional Health
23:55
Ministry. Vittacont later described being
23:57
repeatedly interrupted by the Grunenthal
23:59
team. representatives as he tried
24:01
to present his evidence, but this
24:03
time he took an even firmer
24:05
stand. No, he
24:07
said he couldn't say the case
24:09
was definitively proven, but the evidence
24:12
was overwhelming and there could be
24:14
no reasonable doubt. I
24:16
want to take a minute, or maybe a
24:18
minute and a half, to talk about this
24:20
man, Vito Kunt Lenz. Here you
24:22
have the son of a Nazi, and
24:25
not just some run-of-the-mill Nazi, Fritz
24:27
Lenz. Let me remind you,
24:29
was a prominent eugenics specialist
24:32
who endorsed racial cleansing even
24:34
before Hitler. And
24:37
he believed that disabled people
24:39
should be sterilized, i.e. forcibly
24:42
prevented from reproducing. Fritz
24:45
Lenz was still very much alive
24:47
and espousing these eugenic theories
24:49
when his son took on
24:51
Kemi Grunenthal in the
24:53
name of every single infant
24:56
severely disabled at the hands
24:58
of bad medicine. Like
25:00
his father, Vito Kunt later became a
25:03
geneticist. But not only did
25:05
this apple fall far from the tree,
25:07
it rolled as far away as possible.
25:10
I can only imagine the courage it
25:12
must have taken for the younger Dr.
25:14
Lenz to do what he did in
25:16
1961, still not even a generation removed
25:21
from the Third Reich. Like
25:23
Francis Kelsey, Vito Kunt Lenz was
25:26
no grandstander. The two people hadn't
25:28
met each other, of course, and from what we
25:30
can tell from the scant bit of audio we've
25:32
heard, Vito Kunt was
25:34
soft-spoken but self-assured. And
25:37
like Francis, he came across
25:39
as maybe a little dry,
25:42
a thorough dot all your I's and
25:44
cross all your T's person. So
25:46
you can imagine the level tones he
25:49
must have used when meeting with Grunenthal's
25:51
representatives. In the end,
25:53
the Grunenthal people did agree to add
25:55
a label warning not to use controgandering
25:57
pregnancy. But then they left. and
26:00
Vidakant kept talking to the government people. This
26:03
time, without the Grunital crew in
26:05
the room, Vidakant presented his materials
26:07
more fully, and it
26:09
was decided. A
26:12
warning label wasn't enough. Quietly
26:15
withdrawing the drug from the market
26:17
would not be enough. No. As
26:19
one doctor at the meeting put it, it
26:22
must disappear out
26:24
of the last drawer in every house.
26:27
The word had to get out. The
26:30
state ministry of the interior would
26:32
immediately send cables to local health
26:34
departments telling them to stop the
26:36
sale of thalidomide and contact other
26:38
state governments to warn them as
26:40
well. Then
26:42
things really exploded. Someone
26:44
who'd heard Vidakant's speech at that
26:46
pediatrician's conference had gone to the
26:49
press, and on Sunday, November
26:51
26, the newspaper
26:53
Velt-Amzontag published a story that
26:55
shocked the public. The
26:58
headline, Birth Defects Due to
27:01
Pills? Grunital
27:03
completely loses
27:06
its mind in panic the second
27:08
they realize that the game is
27:10
up. Within a few hours of
27:12
the publication of that story, Grunital
27:14
announced that it was removing Contregan
27:16
from circulation until questions about Phocomelia
27:19
were resolved. And
27:23
the next day, Grunital sent
27:25
out warnings to doctors and pharmacies, but
27:27
they didn't say that this was a
27:29
potentially dangerous drug that they were withdrawing
27:31
to keep the public safe. Listen
27:34
to this wording from a message
27:36
they sent to the West German
27:38
Federal Medical Association. As
27:40
Grunital explained it, the decision
27:42
came, quote, because press
27:45
reports have undermined the
27:47
basis of scientific discussion.
27:50
But the pressure continued to mount. The
27:52
West German Ministry of Health put out
27:55
an urgent warning to women, telling them
27:57
the pill suspected in these births was
27:59
thalidomide. and urging them,
28:02
do not take this drug.
28:05
One other thing that happened, Grunenthal had
28:07
to alert all the companies that had
28:09
licensed this drug to. And
28:12
so on November 29th, William
28:14
S. Merrill received a cable
28:16
from Grunenthal letting the American
28:18
company know that there might
28:20
be an issue with thalidomide,
28:23
a possible association with
28:25
injured babies. They
28:27
were withdrawing it from the German market.
28:30
The next day, Joseph Murray
28:32
called the FDA. He
28:35
had some disquieting news. Next
28:39
time on The Devil in the Details. My
28:42
doctor said the abortion has been
28:44
canceled. They don't know who it
28:46
is, but the county attorney knows
28:48
that someone here in Arizona is
28:50
going to have an abortion and
28:52
they will do a citizen's arrest.
28:58
Ella Fetter was senior producer
29:00
for this episode and Deborah
29:02
Unger was senior managing producer.
29:04
Sarah Wyman was producer. Our
29:06
associate producer is Mila Rahim.
29:09
Sophia Levin and Eva McCullough
29:11
provided research support. Our
29:13
music was composed by Lizzie Yunnan, except
29:15
for the very first piece of music
29:17
you heard in this episode, which is
29:20
called Brit Pop by Scott Holmes Music.
29:22
We had fact-checking help from Lexia Tia.
29:25
Alexa Lim edited the audio. Morgan
29:27
Fus mastered the episode. Lisk Fang
29:29
created the art for the season
29:31
and Lily Weir did the art
29:34
design. Thank you, as always, to
29:36
my co-executive producer, Amy Scharf, and
29:38
to Eowyn Burtner, our program manager.
29:40
Thanks also to Jeff Del Visio
29:42
at our publishing partner, Scientific American.
29:45
We're distributed by PRX. Funding
29:48
for Lost Women of Science comes in
29:50
part by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
29:53
and the Anne Wojcicki Foundation. For
29:56
a transcript of this episode or to learn
29:58
more about Frances Kelsey, please- go
30:00
to our website, lostwomenofscience.org, and
30:03
do not forget to hit
30:05
that all-important Omnipresent Donate button.
30:07
See you next week.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More