Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This episode is brought to you by Progressive
0:02
Insurance. Do you ever think about switching insurance
0:05
companies to see if you could save some
0:07
cash? Progressive makes it easy
0:09
to see if you could save when
0:11
you bundle your home and auto policies.
0:13
Try it at progressive.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance
0:15
Company and affiliates potential savings will vary
0:17
not available in all states. When
0:24
I came to this story, if
0:26
anyone ever did an article
0:29
about thalidomide, they wrote about Frances
0:31
Kelsey and they never even tried
0:34
to pick up a phone and talk to a survivor. I'm
0:39
Katie Hafner and this is Lost
0:41
Women of Science Conversations where
0:44
we talk to authors and artists
0:46
and poets and filmmakers about the
0:49
work they've done to uncover and
0:51
celebrate overlooked women in STEM. Over
0:54
the past five weeks, we've been delving
0:57
into the story of Dr. Frances Kelsey,
0:59
a medical reviewer at the US
1:01
Food and Drug Administration. In
1:04
the early 1960s, she prevented
1:06
thousands of babies from being
1:08
born with shortened limbs, hearing
1:10
loss, weakened organs, and other
1:12
horrible injuries they sustained in
1:14
the womb. If you've
1:17
listened to the whole season, you'll know
1:19
that it was Frances Kelsey who stood
1:21
her ground and would not approve thalidomide,
1:24
the drug that caused all of these
1:26
injuries. But you'll also
1:28
have heard that thalidomide was actually
1:30
available in the United States. More
1:33
than 1,200 American doctors across the
1:35
country were sent pills by the
1:37
company that wanted to manufacture and
1:40
distribute the drug. They
1:42
were part of a network of
1:44
medical professionals asked to carry out
1:46
clinical trials, such as they were,
1:48
with little oversight or guidance. So
1:51
today we've decided to put
1:53
out an episode that zeros in
1:55
on that quiet spread of thousands
1:57
of thalidomide pills across the US
1:59
and the subsequent search for
2:01
survivors. And
2:04
to do this, I'm delighted to welcome
2:06
a familiar voice to those who've been
2:08
tuning into the season, Jennifer Vanderbess. Jennifer
2:12
is the author of the book
2:14
Wonder Drug, The Hidden Victims of
2:16
America's Secret Thalidomide Scandal. The
2:19
book was published in 2023
2:21
and the paperback is out just now. In
2:24
the book, Jennifer uncovered what happened to those
2:26
pills and the people who took them here
2:28
in the US. Jennifer,
2:30
welcome to Lost Women of Science.
2:33
Hi, Katie, it's great to be here. So
2:36
I have to say, first of all, when
2:38
you embark on a nonfiction book, it
2:43
becomes like this magnificent obsession,
2:45
right? Correct. That's your decision
2:47
is, this is this thing I'm going to be
2:49
working on forever and ever. So
2:51
I wanted to ask you, when you
2:53
decided to write the book, you
2:56
knew there were already books about
2:58
Thalidomide, it had been covered a lot.
3:01
So you knew you had a lot of material to work
3:03
with. At the same
3:05
time, I wanted to ask you, how
3:08
did you want your story to differ
3:11
from those that already existed? And
3:13
also, I do have
3:16
to say, I mean, what an incredible bummer of
3:18
a subject. So
3:21
can you answer kind of both
3:23
those questions? Why decide to immerse
3:25
yourself in such a depressing topic?
3:29
It's a great question. I mean, at the
3:31
time, my entry point into this story were
3:34
the heroes, Francis Kelsey,
3:37
the primary one in the story, who
3:39
had sort of been in these glamourless,
3:42
bureaucratic posts doing
3:44
their day to day work and
3:47
rose to the occasion to prevent
3:49
this horrible tragedy from happening
3:51
in the United States. So there
3:54
was a depressing component to the
3:56
story. But I thought what
3:58
I was narrating was the heroism
4:01
of average people who heed the
4:03
call. So I was really inspired
4:05
by the story when I went into it. And
4:07
I didn't quite know the scope
4:09
of it. As you mentioned, thalidomide
4:12
and the thalidomide scandal, which actually
4:14
happened worldwide, was not an unknown
4:17
news item. I'd heard about Frances
4:19
Kelsey. What struck me first,
4:21
actually, was that most of what had
4:23
been written about her in
4:26
the past, let's say, 10 years before I started
4:28
work on the book, was pretty much exactly the
4:30
same as what had been written about her in
4:32
the 1960s. No
4:34
one had really circled back to her. No
4:36
one had done any additional digging. And that
4:38
was pretty much true of all the books
4:40
that I'd read on the subject. And there
4:43
weren't tons of them. There were a
4:45
limited number. Are you saying that her story was accepted
4:47
at face value? Or are you saying that no one
4:49
had advanced the story beyond that period of time in
4:51
history, or a little bit of both? There was a
4:53
little bit of both. There was a little bit of
4:55
case closed. The story that had been delivered was a great
4:58
one. She was a hero.
5:00
The United States spared the effects of
5:02
this horrible drug that had affected babies
5:04
worldwide. JFK gives her an
5:07
award on the White House law. And it's
5:09
a fabulous story. The FDA uses it to
5:11
recruit new medical reviewers. Wonderful, wonderful. When
5:13
I came to it and I started doing my initial
5:16
research, and I was
5:18
reading what we call
5:20
secondary sources. I was reading books. I was
5:22
reading articles. What struck me is that they
5:24
were all referencing pretty much secondhand
5:28
sources from the 1960s. No
5:31
one had gone and looked at any FDA
5:33
records. No one had really done any kind
5:36
of digging into the story beyond what had
5:38
been announced in 1962 as
5:41
the end of the story. And I happened to be aware
5:43
at the time that her papers had landed at the Library
5:45
of Congress, and that some other papers
5:48
and documents relating to people peripherally
5:50
connected to the story were available. There
5:53
was a lot more that subsequently was
5:55
revealed. There were the FDA-recommended
5:57
criminal charges be pressed against the...
8:00
trying to do a deeper dive into research
8:02
was an interest in really bringing to
8:04
light the stories of these various women
8:07
who had been so essential in keeping
8:09
the drug off the market. So
8:12
you had this epiphanous moment when
8:14
you wrote to your editor and
8:16
you realized what? Yes.
8:20
So I had proposed this book
8:22
using the information that was widely circulating
8:24
for decades, which is that there were
8:27
about 17 American babies harmed
8:30
by the drug thalidomide and about
8:32
half of those were supposed to be due to
8:35
exposure from overseas thalidomide. So
8:38
it's supposed to be a very small number. And by
8:40
all accounts, most of those individuals
8:43
had not lived into adulthood.
8:46
Right. So when you say from overseas
8:48
that somebody would go overseas, find the
8:50
drug. In fact, we start the first
8:53
episode of the season with Sherry
8:55
Cheson and her husband
8:57
was in England and
9:00
came back with distival, which is how
9:02
thalidomide was branded and she took it.
9:05
And so that you're saying that that is what
9:07
it was chalked up to as people having gotten
9:09
the pill overseas. Yeah. And for
9:12
half of those FDA cases, that was
9:14
accurate. So the story was that, you
9:16
know, Francis Kelsey had not
9:18
approved thalidomide. Therefore, a very,
9:21
very small number of babies had been
9:23
exposed to it through what was suggested
9:25
to be a very small number of
9:27
clinical trials. I put that in my
9:29
proposal, you know, for Random House. That was part
9:32
of the story I thought I was telling. That there were
9:34
17. The 17. And
9:37
I don't know why,
9:39
except, you know, the
9:41
nature of working on a nonfiction book like this
9:43
that sort of always feels like it gets a
9:46
little bigger and a little stranger is that
9:48
sometimes late at night, I would just
9:50
Google things I'd already googled just to
9:53
see if I don't know something different
9:55
came up. Right. And I don't know
9:57
why or what exactly I would. into
12:00
their lives. There are survivors
12:02
that we know of who, you know, didn't
12:04
make it past their 40s. I
12:07
would say now there are probably
12:09
about 100 living in
12:12
the U.S. And it's a challenging
12:15
number to establish because
12:18
we lack, what their overseas counterparts
12:20
lack, which is a sort of
12:23
concrete proof. And the
12:25
injuries can vary widely. But I think the
12:27
numbers are on par with
12:30
the Canadian survivors. I think the drug was
12:32
so widespread here that you had about
12:35
as many injuries as the Canadians saw in
12:38
a country where it was legally distributed. Yeah,
12:41
I'm very involved with the American
12:43
thalidomide community and we still have people
12:46
emailing, you know, every few
12:48
weeks. And it's either, I think
12:50
I might be a survivor or a very
12:53
common story is we had
12:55
a sibling. I know that my mother
12:57
had a baby after me. I
12:59
was three. I remember something, something.
13:01
They didn't want to talk about it, right? I
13:03
mean, that's a pretty frequent outreach,
13:06
the surviving siblings of a thalidomide baby in
13:08
a family that didn't know what to make
13:10
of it. And is
13:12
it true that to this day,
13:14
the United States remains the world's
13:16
sole developed nation that
13:18
refuses to support a single
13:21
thalidomide victim? Is that true?
13:24
Yes, yes, absolutely. And
13:27
they're fighting it right now. They being
13:29
the thalidomide survivors. Yes, yes.
13:32
Speaking of which, there's a famous very
13:34
messy case, Hagens Berman.
13:37
Yes. Can you tell me about
13:39
that? So there's
13:41
a law firm in Seattle that
13:44
has mounted a lot of very
13:46
famous successful class action suits against
13:48
large wrongdoers. They
13:52
heard about the thalidomide story after
13:55
a very successful case in Australia
13:57
in which some adult survivors who
13:59
hadn't previously... been recognized, were able
14:01
to get compensation. This
14:03
American firm became interested, and
14:06
they started placing ads
14:08
and trying to find whatever American survivors
14:10
they could. They gathered, I think it
14:13
was about 50 or so
14:15
in their first filing, and they
14:17
brought it to a court.
14:19
Now, we have a thing in the United
14:22
States called the Statute of Limitations, which makes
14:24
it incredibly hard to bring a suit
14:27
decades later. And this
14:29
has been sitting, I mean,
14:32
boy, I mean, well over a
14:34
decade in a Philadelphia court as
14:37
a judge and some other
14:39
people involved try to untangle whether
14:42
or not this case can
14:44
really even be heard, and
14:47
whether or not the survivors
14:49
can establish that
14:52
there's a reason they didn't know
14:54
until recently that they were thalidomide
14:56
survivors. My hope in the book,
14:58
and I did something I
15:00
never thought I would do, but I sort of insert myself as
15:02
a character at the end because it became
15:04
impossible to tell the story truthfully
15:06
without acknowledging that my role as
15:09
an author, meeting people in this community, doing
15:11
research that was very pertinent to their lives,
15:14
their legal cases, their story, there was simply
15:16
no way to pretend that the writing of
15:18
this book and the research wasn't actually impacting
15:20
the story. Right. It
15:23
emboldened people. I think
15:25
that was a very smart decision on your part. Yeah.
15:28
And it was the most honest way to go
15:30
about it. And they are still
15:32
trying to see if there
15:34
is a universe in which this court case can
15:36
be heard. What I thought could be helpful in
15:39
what I discovered in the book. So
15:41
when Hoggins-Burman brought this case, the
15:43
defense, these pharmaceutical companies now, they've
15:46
been gobbled up by larger firms and
15:48
go by different names. But their argument
15:50
was, hey, like here's an article by Morton
15:53
Mince from 1962. See,
15:55
everybody knew that thalidomide was round
15:57
and about. This made it all
15:59
clear. Everybody should have known
16:01
in the 1960s that they might have been exposed to it,
16:04
brought these lawsuits ages ago, end of story.
16:07
What I, and they submitted to the court
16:09
a list, it probably was 40 or 50
16:12
articles that had appeared in the 1960s about
16:14
the litemite. What I tried
16:17
to clarify in the book is
16:19
that in the real of it, you know, if
16:21
you live in Mississippi and
16:23
are not reading the Washington Post, you
16:26
know, this is not the age of Google, where
16:28
you have a baby with shortened arms and you
16:31
just type it into your computer and it comes
16:33
up like, oh, maybe this is related to the
16:35
litemite, to really establish how completely in
16:37
the dark these families were.
16:40
And, you know, to me,
16:43
one of the biggest horror stories of this
16:45
story is not the drug itself, it's
16:48
the complicity of the doctors along the
16:50
way. Well, yes, let's get
16:52
into that. The complicity of the doctors
16:54
along the way, because what we need
16:56
to explain is how it
16:58
is that those pills were distributed in
17:01
the United States. So why don't you
17:03
tell me about that? Yeah, so there
17:05
was, you know, we had an FDA
17:07
when thalidomide was invented and we
17:09
had a process, which was you're a drug
17:11
firm, you want to sell a drug, okay,
17:13
you need to submit to the FDA an
17:16
application explaining what this drug is, how it
17:18
works, and you should submit
17:20
to them some human research, and
17:22
we call those clinical trials, right? And
17:24
nowadays, if you're part of a clinical
17:27
trial, my guess is you've probably signed
17:29
some extensive paperwork, you know, acknowledging
17:31
that you're in a clinical trial, understanding the terms,
17:33
the risks, or whatever. Well, in 1959, if you
17:35
were in a clinical trial, like
17:40
maybe your doctor knew, but
17:42
you didn't necessarily know, and
17:44
further, with thalidomide
17:46
specifically, because the drug
17:48
had been sold overseas for a few
17:50
years and was so successful, the approach
17:52
of Merrill, the American drug firm, when
17:55
they wanted to put it on the
17:57
American market, was like, this
17:59
is a slam dunk. This is
18:01
like aspirin. Like, it's been circulating, it's
18:03
fine, clinical trial, schminical
18:05
trial. So Meryl decides
18:07
that for thalidomide, they're going
18:10
to get the sales force engaged before
18:12
FDA approval. So they essentially
18:14
send their entire sales force around
18:16
the country to knock on doors
18:18
in hospitals. They want doctors
18:21
with the most access to
18:23
the most patients. And they say, FDA
18:26
approval is like around the corner. This is the
18:28
greatest drug ever. Go ahead. We'll
18:31
ship you a few thousand pills. And
18:34
that's how they start. By 1960,
18:36
there's sort of two things going
18:38
on simultaneously in the story. One is that this
18:41
massive stack of papers sitting on Francis
18:43
Kelsey's desk, and at the same time,
18:46
there are like a few hundred salesmen
18:48
hobnobbing in a hotel in Cincinnati, getting
18:50
their marching orders about their new sales
18:52
mission, which is to basically sweep the
18:55
country, go hospital to hospital, doctor
18:57
to doctor, and try to get these doctors
18:59
as excited as possible about
19:02
handing out thalidomide before FDA
19:04
approval. And the reason that Meryl was so
19:06
hot to trot on this drug is that
19:09
Meryl saw that the German company
19:11
that had first developed and
19:13
sold the drug Grunenthal was
19:16
making money hand over fist. Sedatives
19:19
in the 1960s were a goldmine. It
19:22
was an era where people believed
19:25
that every discomfort, anxiety could
19:27
be solved, remedied
19:31
by a pill. These were drugs
19:33
that were not designed to treat an
19:35
illness for a week. They were going
19:37
to be taken like everyday drugs a few
19:39
times a day, hopefully into perpetuity. This
19:42
was the most lucrative kind of pharmaceutical you
19:44
could put on the market in 1960. And
19:48
they were guns blazing, ready to go.
19:51
And all they had to do was
19:53
get FDA approval and get Francis Kelsey to say,
19:55
OK, go. She
19:57
wouldn't do that. But they kept
19:59
deciding. distributing it to doctors under
20:02
the guise of clinical trials. And it's really
20:04
important to really explain that
20:06
though they called them clinical trials,
20:09
when the FDA finally investigated these
20:11
were completely sloppy, undocumented,
20:13
no records of patients' age, dosages,
20:15
you know, it was a hot
20:18
mess. And because they
20:20
had been so ambitious
20:23
and overzealous in representing
20:25
this to doctors, the
20:27
key part of what went wrong in the
20:29
American story is that when they
20:32
finally realized that over 1200 doctors had
20:34
officially been given the drug, they
20:36
also discovered that those doctors had
20:39
handed it to their friends. So
20:41
the number starts to double, triple,
20:43
quadruple really quickly. And
20:46
the reason why it became hard
20:48
to impossible for the American survivors
20:51
to ever concretely prove that they were
20:53
given the drug is that their
20:55
mothers were not seeing a doctor that was on
20:57
that list of 1200 official doctors. Their
21:01
mothers were seeing doctors that were
21:03
friends with those doctors working in
21:05
the same hospital, golf buddies. That's
21:08
how it's spread so perniciously and in
21:10
this completely undocumented way. Unbelievable.
21:14
That is, it's
21:16
shocking. I mean, and also, you
21:18
know, these women were just being told, oh, this
21:20
will help you sleep. Oh, this will help with
21:22
morning sickness. Were they given the morning sickness line
21:25
at that point as well? The
21:27
drug was distributed for everything
21:29
from morning sickness to headaches,
21:31
to menstrual cramps, to anxiety.
21:33
A lot of doctors actually believe that morning
21:35
sickness was not a real medical condition. Excuse
21:37
me? Right. They
21:40
just believed that it was anxiety about
21:42
potentially an unwanted pregnancy. Right. That
21:45
was a medical theory in circulation amongst male
21:47
doctors. The reason
21:49
that it made sense to them to give
21:51
an anti-anxiety pill was that they thought that
21:53
that's what was actually at the root of
21:55
what was causing a woman
21:58
to feel nauseated. so
22:00
they were handing it out for everything. More
22:04
after the break. Hey
22:10
listeners, are you ready
22:12
to uncover something extraordinary? We're
22:15
thrilled to partner with the amazing Curiosity
22:17
Box. They are a
22:19
science subscription for curious minds,
22:21
created by Vsauce. This
22:24
season's box is packed with items
22:26
that will fascinate and inspire, including
22:28
the picture pie, where art and
22:30
mathematics merge into a colorful creative
22:33
masterpiece. It's fun and
22:35
educational. And get your
22:37
hands on something that really comes from Mars.
22:39
A sample of Martian soil. Experience
22:42
the thrill of holding a piece of the
22:44
red planet. Don't miss
22:46
out on this unique adventure. Subscribe
22:49
to the Curiosity Box at
22:51
curiositybox.com and
22:53
use the code LWOS50 to get
22:56
a 50% discount on
22:59
the first box. Unbox the
23:01
mysteries of the universe with the
23:03
Curiosity Box. All
23:07
right, so there's Kelsey. Let's circle
23:09
back to her for a minute.
23:12
She doesn't know any of this. All
23:15
she really knows is that she's unhappy with
23:17
the application. She sees
23:19
holes in it. It's quote, incomplete,
23:21
incomplete, incomplete. And she keeps throwing it back
23:23
at them. And the Meryl people are, especially
23:27
this one guy, Joseph Murray, he's
23:30
like going out of his mind because he's
23:32
promised his bosses that this thing was gonna
23:34
get rubber stamped. Okay, so
23:36
it all comes out just
23:40
very quickly to make a
23:42
very long story shorter. The Germans
23:44
withdraw it after a
23:47
lot of pressure after having denied it for a
23:49
long time. In November of 1961,
23:53
but can I tell you, Jennifer, that
23:55
what I, through this entire
23:58
season, what... galls
24:00
me more than anything. And I know what you
24:02
mean about how we aren't in the age of
24:04
Google, but the time lapse
24:07
between when, for instance,
24:10
the Germans withdraw the drug from
24:12
the market in Germany and others
24:15
withdraw it in other places. Word
24:18
doesn't get out in the United States.
24:21
My main kind of
24:24
rant in the season is why
24:27
was there this delay? It's
24:30
interesting. I mean, of the many
24:32
irresponsible things done along the way,
24:34
the sort of concrete facts that
24:36
the inventor and licenser
24:39
of the drug in Germany removes
24:41
it completely from the market because
24:43
of documented concerns that
24:45
it's causing birth defects. And
24:48
Maryland, the U.S. does not
24:50
withdraw their application from the FDA. But
24:52
they knew it. They obviously they knew
24:54
it. And I'll circle back to this
24:56
amazing sales force that they have. Let's
24:58
just say you find out that a
25:00
drug you've sent around the country is
25:03
wreaking havoc. You
25:05
don't need to mail letters. You've got
25:07
all these guys in their suits with
25:09
their briefcases who can drive up and
25:11
tell doctors right away, stop giving it
25:13
out. And they don't do that. The
25:15
detailmen were never even told that the
25:17
drug was no longer safe. So
25:21
Merrill takes this sort of,
25:23
you know, reckless, optimistic, idiotic,
25:27
you know, criminal,
25:29
like so many adjectives
25:31
you could throw at it. But
25:33
essentially they choose not to withdraw
25:36
the application. They
25:38
send a few, I'll call
25:40
them light letters to a
25:42
few clinical investigators basically saying
25:44
that they're not alarmed. You
25:46
know, this is what's happened.
25:49
You know, maybe proceed cautiously.
25:52
So yes, you have months and months and
25:54
months go by where this drug
25:56
is still freely circulating. The public
25:58
has no idea. Most doctors. no idea.
26:00
This story has been resolved
26:02
by all accounts in Europe, but in
26:05
the United States, this drug is still
26:07
zipping around from doctor's office to doctor's
26:09
office and being handed to women. And
26:12
it's absolutely bonkers to think how many months that
26:14
went on. It wasn't a matter of weeks, it
26:16
was months. And then the
26:18
other big question. Once Frances Kelsey
26:21
knew how harmful it was and all those
26:23
dots had been connected, did
26:25
she know about all those detail
26:27
men, Meryl's sales guys, and
26:30
how many pills had been distributed around the
26:32
US? And what did she
26:34
do in order to investigate how many
26:36
American survivors there were? So
26:39
as soon as this news hits the FDA, some
26:42
portion of it is sort of removed
26:44
from her purview, right? Like she understands,
26:47
oh my God, this drug is harmful.
26:49
She starts making phone calls. And what
26:51
she starts hearing, which is basically what
26:54
the FDA encounters is, oh
26:56
yes, we do have a few babies
26:58
at this hospital born with folkamelia,
27:00
but no, they weren't given the drug.
27:03
At this same hospital, this incredibly rare
27:05
condition. Right, exactly. Where you
27:07
should only see one case every 30
27:09
years. Oh yes, we had five in the
27:11
last two years. Oh yes, it was in
27:13
the hospital pharmacy, but no, all
27:16
the doctors are saying that that wasn't exposure.
27:18
It's interesting to talk about sort of pharmaceutical
27:20
greed, which I think everybody would sort of
27:22
nod their heads nowadays and say, oh yeah,
27:24
yeah, yeah, we get. For me,
27:27
the really shocking component of this
27:29
story was realizing how many
27:31
physicians after the fact knew
27:34
what they had given these women, knew
27:36
that they had contributed and participated, you
27:38
know, not their fault, but they had
27:40
information that was very essential to share
27:42
and they chose not to. One of
27:44
the early rare court cases, which is
27:46
a case of David Diamond,
27:49
whose mother had been visiting the Cleveland
27:51
Clinic, her husband I think was suffering
27:53
a heart attack. She kind of is
27:55
in the hospital corridors, having
27:57
an anxiety attack and someone hands her an envelope.
38:00
all-important omnipresent donate
38:02
button. See you next time. Hi,
38:12
I'm Katie Hafner, co-executive producer of
38:14
Lost Women of Science. We
38:17
need your help. Tracking down
38:19
all the information that makes our stories
38:21
so rich and engaging
38:24
and original is no easy
38:26
thing. Imagine being confronted
38:28
with boxes full of hundreds of letters
38:30
in handwriting that's hard to read or
38:33
trying to piece together someone's life with
38:35
just her name to go on. Your
38:38
donations make this work possible.
38:41
Help us bring you more stories of
38:43
remarkable women. There's a prominent
38:45
donate button on our website. All you
38:47
have to do is click.
38:51
Please visit lostwomenofscience.org.
38:54
That's lostwomenofscience.org. From
39:01
PRX.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More